On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 06:00:30PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Hello.
This is (c) Add new hooks. approach I proposed at
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org/msg11536.html .
Although this is an incomplete patch,
I want to know whether you can tolerate this approach or
Hello.
No printable comments, except for that:
(e) why don't you guys move the Linus' Serious Mistake to _callers_ of
vfs_mknod() and its ilk?
Which obviously solves all problems with having vfsmount.
Excuse me. I didn't understand what the Linus' Serious Mistake to
_callers_ of
In the LSM ml, we are discussing about
how to know requested pathnames within LSM modules.
Currently, VFS helper functions don't pass struct vfsmount parameter.
Therefore, we cannot calculate requested pathnames within LSM modules
because LSM hooks can't know struct vfsmount parameter that
