On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:47:59PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
So what should I do?
Would Al be wanting to merge this into his VFS tree? (Can't find it
on git.kernel.org yet, BTW.)
FWIW, it's on hera right now, should propagate to git.kernel.org in a few.
Branches I'd pushed there:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
c) just what is limited by that sysctl? AFAICS, rbind is allowed
if mountpoint is on user vfsmount and it seems to create vfsmounts without
eating into that limit just fine... What's the point of limiting the
amount of
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 06:33:13PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
c) just what is limited by that sysctl? AFAICS, rbind is allowed
if mountpoint is on user vfsmount and it seems to create vfsmounts without
eating into that limit just fine... What's the point of limiting the
amount
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:21:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Linus has just merged all the VFS renaming patches, so the decks
are clear for looking at this work.
However David and Christoph are beavering away on the r-o-bind-mounts
patches and I expect that there will be overlaps with
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:01:20 -0500 Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:21:03PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Linus has just merged all the VFS renaming patches, so the decks
are clear for looking at this work.
However David and Christoph are beavering
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 01:09:51AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
However David and Christoph are beavering away on the r-o-bind-mounts
patches and I expect that there will be overlaps with unprivileged mounts.
Could we coordinate things a bit please? Decide who goes first, review
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:36:16 +0100 Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just documentation updates, compared to the previous submission.
Thanks to Serge for the relentless reviews :)
Please consider for -mm, and then for 2.6.26.
Linus has just merged all the VFS renaming patches, so the
