Hi all,
recently I tried to use the STONITH plugin external/vcenter along with
vCenter 5 (I doubt, that the version is significant).
While using the stonith resource for each node separately, I had no
problems, but using it in a clone resulted in failures like that one:
Nov 14 08:53:57
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:52:48AM +0100, Stefan Botter wrote:
Hi all,
recently I tried to use the STONITH plugin external/vcenter along with
vCenter 5 (I doubt, that the version is significant).
While using the stonith resource for each node separately, I had no
problems, but using
Hi Dejan,
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:10:27 PM Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
It could be that the issue comes from the bug in fence_legacy,
which has been resolved in the meantime. Can you try to edit that
and replace the split command (line 86) with the following (i.e.
just append , 2):
clusterlabs.org/doc is as good as i can do for docs.
i try to keep it up-to-date and version specific (so that
documenting corosync 2.x doesn't obliterate the cman/plugin stuff).
packages are mostly in the hands of the distros though.
building the entire stack (and keeping it up-to-date)
On 11/15/2012 09:53 AM, Robinson, Eric wrote:
clusterlabs.org/doc is as good as i can do for docs.
i try to keep it up-to-date and version specific (so that
documenting corosync 2.x doesn't obliterate the cman/plugin stuff).
packages are mostly in the hands of the distros though.
building
Hello,
I dont know if this email address is used for support, but I have not found
any forum for HA
I have to secure a homemade monitoring solution mainly based on Nagios 2.x
and MySQL 5.1.
I must deploy an active / passive cluster with automated switch of
services. 2 servers will
Hi friend:
I want know heartbeat is support oracle ASM now??
HILL FANG
Engineer
Guangzhou Ericsson Communication Services Co.,Ltd.(GTC)
SI Support
2 /F, NO. 1025 Gaopu Road, Tianhe Software Park,Tianhe District, Guangzhou,
510663, PR China
Phone +86 020-85117631
Fax +86 020-29002699
On 11/14/2012 03:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
Linux in general is all about choice, possibly to a fault. I see
no reason why clustering shouldn't be the same.
I really like linux and cluster frameworks to spent choice (I was
even so near to miss-spell that as joice :) but on the other hand
it does not
On 11/15/2012 12:03 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I can think of 3 tooling changes:
- ptest/crm_simulate - hb_report/crm_report - standalone crmsh
Thats not /too/ bad in 4 years.
But completely un-needed. Where is the benefit on changing from crm to
pcs?
On 11/14/2012 11:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I sincerely hope SUSE does continue with crmsh but I _like_ that
there are people trying something new.
Yes I also like things which are going better. But what is the benefit
on dropping CRM and introducing PCS to that procject? What is the
benefit
On 11/14/2012 05:10 PM, alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi Just for information, I'm using cleanup and crm_mon very very
very often with lots of ressources configured in Pacemaker and
never had any problem like the problems you describe ... (on RHEL)
Alain
crm shell and tools like crm_mon are
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:00:43PM +, Robinson, Eric wrote:
Should I be using pcs or crmsh?
Neither one seems to work quite right.
What doesn't work? I think that at this point of time, it's
be easier to get crmsh going/fixed with pcmk 1.1.8. It's
probably just some
On 11/15/2012 05:00 AM, Hill Fang wrote:
Hi friend:
I want know heartbeat is support oracle ASM now??
The heartbeat project has been deprecated for some time. There are no
plans to continue it's development. I am unsure of it's supported state
on Oracle, but regardless, I would advice you
On 11/15/2012 02:52 AM, julien.marie...@soget.fr wrote:
Hello,
I don’t know if this email address is used for support, but I have not found
any forum for HA …
This channel is for pretty much any open-source cluster program, so you
are in the right place.
I have to secure a homemade
On 11/15/2012 06:52 AM, Fabian Herschel wrote:
On 11/14/2012 11:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I sincerely hope SUSE does continue with crmsh but I _like_ that
there are people trying something new.
Yes I also like things which are going better. But what is the benefit
on dropping CRM and
There is an RA for Oracle that can be used with Pacemaker. Generally ASM
behaves like a regular Oracle instance, so you can try it.
On Nov 15, 2012 8:57 AM, Hill Fang hill.f...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi friend:
I want know heartbeat is support oracle ASM now??
HILL FANG
Engineer
On 2012-11-15T10:00:21, Hill Fang hill.f...@ericsson.com wrote:
Hi friend:
I want know heartbeat is support oracle ASM now??
No - and yes.
Oracle RAC (I assume that's the context for ASM?) does not tolerate any
cluster solution except itself. This is not supported together with
On 2012-11-15T09:20:44, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
LCMC and crmsh/hawk are at least conceptionally very very different;
Conceptually LCMC and hawk are both web based GUIs, its the
implementation that makes them so different.
Not quite. LCMC is pretty heavily different from a
On 2012-11-14T15:11:05, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
any reason at all, to try new things. Sometimes it is superior, often it
is not. In either case, users are free to go where they feel is best.
Ah, but can they? How likely is it that the large distributions will
offer both? Only those
On 11/15/2012 10:11 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 11/15/2012 02:52 AM, julien.marie...@soget.fr wrote:
Hello,
I have to secure a homemade monitoring solution mainly based on Nagios 2.x
and MySQL 5.1.
I must deploy an active / passive cluster with automated switch of
services. 2 servers will be
On 11/15/2012 02:03 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
Apologies for bad cun-n-paste:
Where'd security products come from? Do you mean you nagios+mysql
setup is doing some sort of security monitoring? The good thing about
heartbeat is it's not being developed anymore. So what you've learned
about it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/15/2012 03:03 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 11/15/2012 10:11 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 11/15/2012 02:52 AM, julien.marie...@soget.fr wrote:
Hello,
I have to secure a homemade monitoring solution mainly based
on Nagios 2.x and MySQL 5.1.
I
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Robinson, Eric eric.robin...@psmnv.com wrote:
clusterlabs.org/doc is as good as i can do for docs.
i try to keep it up-to-date and version specific (so that
documenting corosync 2.x doesn't obliterate the cman/plugin stuff).
packages are mostly in the hands of
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Fabian Herschel
fabian.hersc...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/14/2012 11:20 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
I sincerely hope SUSE does continue with crmsh but I _like_ that
there are people trying something new.
Yes I also like things which are going better. But what is
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Fabian Herschel
fabian.hersc...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/14/2012 05:10 PM, alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi Just for information, I'm using cleanup and crm_mon very very
very often with lots of ressources configured in Pacemaker and
never had any problem like the
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2012-11-14T15:11:05, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
any reason at all, to try new things. Sometimes it is superior, often it
is not. In either case, users are free to go where they feel is best.
Ah, but can they?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.com wrote:
On 2012-11-15T09:20:44, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
LCMC and crmsh/hawk are at least conceptionally very very different;
Conceptually LCMC and hawk are both web based GUIs, its the
implementation that makes
Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm schrieb am 15.11.2012 um 17:05 in
Nachricht 20121115160527.GB3763@squib:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:00:43PM +, Robinson, Eric wrote:
[...]
crm_mon 'crashes' sometimes. If I have crm_mon running one one computer and
I change the config from
28 matches
Mail list logo
