Re: [Linux-HA] Many Resources Dependent on One Resource Group

2013-03-25 Thread Moullé Alain
Hi If I well understand, I would have tried : group G1 mandatory B C group G2 advisory D to I order mandatory group G1 than G2 this should work if I understand well your needs. Regards Alain In the simplest terms, we currently have resources: A = drbd B = filesystem C = cluster IP D

Re: [Linux-HA] Many Resources Dependent on One Resource Group

2013-03-25 Thread Moullé Alain
Hi ooops, I made a mistake this morning, should be that : group G1 B C [ order advisory D to I (if you need to launch only one at a time, otherwise it is not needed) ] order mandatory for each D to I and group G1 : G1 than D, G1 than E, etc. colocations between each D to I and group G1

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat IPv6addr OCF

2013-03-25 Thread Keisuke MORI
Hi Nick, Could you privide which version of resource-agents you're using? Prior to 3.9.2, IPv6addr requires a static IPv6 address with the exactly same prefix to find out an apropriate nic; so you should have statically assigned 2600:3c00::34:c003/116 on eth0 for example. As of 3.9.3, it has

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat IPv6addr OCF

2013-03-25 Thread Nick Walke
Looks like 3.9.2-5. So I need to statically assign the address I want to use before using it with IPv6addr? On Mar 25, 2013 3:44 AM, Keisuke MORI keisuke.mori...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nick, Could you privide which version of resource-agents you're using? Prior to 3.9.2, IPv6addr requires a

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat IPv6addr OCF

2013-03-25 Thread Keisuke MORI
2013/3/25 Nick Walke tubaguy50...@gmail.com: Looks like 3.9.2-5. So I need to statically assign the address I want to use before using it with IPv6addr? Yes. On Mar 25, 2013 3:44 AM, Keisuke MORI keisuke.mori...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nick, Could you privide which version of

Re: [Linux-HA] [lvs-users] Piranha Project

2013-03-25 Thread Ryan O'Hara
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:58:53PM +0100, Charles Williams wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I recently found myself in need of a LVS and HA web gui for our clusters/balancers here to help ease some of our less expierenced admins. I can't say that I was

Re: [Linux-HA] [lvs-users] [Pacemaker] Piranha Project

2013-03-25 Thread Jason Ledford
I know it's not nearly as polished a solution, but have you tried using something like webmin to manage lvs and HA? I have some custom scripts and commands that I have setup in webmin under the custom commands section. This keeps non-linux admins away from shell access. My documents have

Re: [Linux-HA] Pacemeker ssl / freeradius agent

2013-03-25 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Mittwoch, 20. März 2013, 10:55:11 schrieb Heiko Reimer: Hi, i search an agent to control ssl / freeradius in a pacemaker / corosync setup but there are no standard agents. Has anybody such an agent or an idea where i can get one? thx Heiko Reimer You could check the lsb script.

Re: [Linux-HA] [lvs-users] [Pacemaker] Piranha Project

2013-03-25 Thread Laura Garcia
Hi, zen load balancer does not use just pen... the layer 4 load balancing is done at netfilter level... El 19/03/2013 19:29, Charles Williams ch...@itadmins.net escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/19/2013 07:15 PM, Ryan O'Hara wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at

[Linux-HA] Need help in setting up a two node cluster in different subnet

2013-03-25 Thread deep saran
Hi all, I am trying to setup a two node cluster where both nodes are in different subnet. I am using corosync/pacemaker for this. I am newbie in this field and have no idea how to configure corosync/pacemaker to work in different subnet. My initial investigation suggest that it is possible using

Re: [Linux-HA] Need help in setting up a two node cluster in different subnet

2013-03-25 Thread Florian Crouzat
Le 24/03/2013 16:59, deep saran a écrit : Hi all, I am trying to setup a two node cluster where both nodes are in different subnet. I am using corosync/pacemaker for this. I am newbie in this field and have no idea how to configure corosync/pacemaker to work in different subnet. My initial

Re: [Linux-HA] Need help in setting up a two node cluster in different subnet

2013-03-25 Thread David Coulson
Assuming the two systems can already route between each other, just configure udpu as your transport. Example config: http://lists.corosync.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-October/48.html On Mar 24, 2013, at 11:59 AM, deep saran wrote: Hi all, I am trying to setup a two node cluster where

Re: [Linux-HA] Need help in setting up a two node cluster in different subnet

2013-03-25 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Montag, 25. März 2013, 14:43:00 schrieb Florian Crouzat: Le 24/03/2013 16:59, deep saran a écrit : Hi all, I am trying to setup a two node cluster where both nodes are in different subnet. I am using corosync/pacemaker for this. I am newbie in this field and have no idea how to

Re: [Linux-HA] Need help in setting up a two node cluster in different subnet

2013-03-25 Thread Florian Crouzat
Le 25/03/2013 14:48, Michael Schwartzkopff a écrit : Am Montag, 25. März 2013, 14:43:00 schrieb Florian Crouzat: you can avoid this problem using the udpu transport which switches the inter- node communication to to unicast. google for corosync udpu for further info. I believe you cannot use

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat IPv6addr OCF

2013-03-25 Thread Nick Walke
That works. Thanks! Nick On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Keisuke MORI keisuke.mori...@gmail.comwrote: 2013/3/25 Nick Walke tubaguy50...@gmail.com: Looks like 3.9.2-5. So I need to statically assign the address I want to use before using it with IPv6addr? Yes. On Mar 25, 2013 3:44

[Linux-HA] manage/umanage

2013-03-25 Thread Moullé Alain
Hi, I've tested two things : 1/ if we set maintenance-mode=true : all the configured ressources become 'unmanaged' , as displayed with crm_mon ok start stop are no more accepted and it seems that ressources are no more monitored any more by pacemaker 2/ if we target only one

Re: [Linux-HA] Many Resources Dependent on One Resource Group

2013-03-25 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 2013-03-24 17:58, Robinson, Eric wrote: In the simplest terms, we currently have resources: A = drbd B = filesystem C = cluster IP D thru J = mysql instances. Resource group G1 consists of resources B through J, in that order, and is dependent on resource A. This fails over fine,