[Linux-HA] Antw: Re: Pacemaker - Resource dont get started on the standby node.

2013-06-17 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! The problem seems to be this: Jun 15 20:16:27 prod-hb-nmn-002 pengine: [4401]: WARN: unpack_rsc_op: Processing failed op apache_start_0 on prod-hb-nmn-002: unknown error (1) Check why apache won't start. Regards, Ulrich Parkirat parkiratba...@gmail.com schrieb am 15.06.2013 um 22:24 in

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: ocf HA_RSCTMP directory location

2013-06-17 Thread Ulrich Windl
David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com schrieb am 14.06.2013 um 16:21 in Nachricht 206418282.11638415.1371219712940.javamail.r...@redhat.com: [...] I think RAs should not rely on the fact that temp directories are clean when a resource is going to be started. The resource tmp directory has to get

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: Pacemaker - Resource dont get started on the standby node.

2013-06-17 Thread Parkirat
Thanks Ulrich, I have figured out the problem. The actual problem was in the configuration file for the resource httpd. It was correct in the Master node but the configuration was missing in the standby node, which was not allowing it to start. Regards, Parkirat Singh Bagga. -- View this

Re: [Linux-HA] Antw: Re: Pacemaker - Resource dont get started on the standby node.

2013-06-17 Thread emmanuel segura
Hello Parkirat Thank you very much 2013/6/17 Parkirat parkiratba...@gmail.com Thanks Ulrich, I have figured out the problem. The actual problem was in the configuration file for the resource httpd. It was correct in the Master node but the configuration was missing in the standby node,

[Linux-HA] Heartbeat haresources with IPv6

2013-06-17 Thread listas
Hi, I'm using Ubuntu 12.04 + Heartbeat 3.0.5-3ubuntu2 to provide high availability for some IP addresses. I want to configure an IPv6 address on my haresources. I did this: File /etc/heartbeat/haresources: server.domain.com \ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; 192.168.2.62/32/eth1 \ nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;

Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat haresources with IPv6

2013-06-17 Thread Digimer
Ho Thiago, Heartbeat is deprecated and has not been developed in some time. There are no plans to restart development, either. It is _strongly_ advised that new setups use corosync + pacemaker. You can use the IPv6 resource agents with it, too. The best place to look is on

[Linux-HA] Resource Collocation v/s Resource Groups

2013-06-17 Thread Parkirat
Hi, Is there any difference between Resource Collocation and Resource Groups? I grouped 2 resources both having migration_threshold=2 and monitor_interval=60s. When, I stopped 1 of the resource from the group, I did not restarted. However, when I was configuring the resource not in the group,

[Linux-HA] Why cman is started at rc0.d and rc6.d

2013-06-17 Thread Su Chen
Hi All, I am very new to pacemaker, cororsync and cman. I installed the packages on an Ubuntu machine. (aptitude install pacemaker cman fence-agents) To my surprise, cman has a link under rc0.d and rc6.d, why cman need to be started while system is shuting down? root@SuTH3:/etc# ls -l

Re: [Linux-HA] Why cman is started at rc0.d and rc6.d

2013-06-17 Thread Su Chen
And another thing is it never get killed. Should it be stopped when system is halting? root@SuTH3:/etc# ls /etc/rc* | grep cman S05cman S05cman S61cman Thanks, Su From: Su Chen Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 11:17 AM To: 'General Linux-HA mailing list' Subject: Why cman is started at rc0.d and

Re: [Linux-HA] Resource Collocation v/s Resource Groups

2013-06-17 Thread Sven Arnold
Hi Pakirat, Is there any difference between Resource Collocation and Resource Groups? Resources inside a resource group are colocated _and_ ordered. See http://clusterlabs.org/doc/Ordering_Explained.pdf for more details. I grouped 2 resources both having migration_threshold=2 and

Re: [Linux-HA] Resource Collocation v/s Resource Groups

2013-06-17 Thread Parkirat
Hi Sven, Thanks for the reply. I am now collocating resources but the same problem of the resource not getting started when manually stopped persists when my migration_threshold=2, and its the 1st time, I have brought down the resource after doing the cleanup as well as waiting for the

Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation

2013-06-17 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - From: David Vossel dvos...@redhat.com To: General Linux-HA mailing list linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 4:41:06 PM Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] LVM Resource agent, exclusive activation - Original Message - From: David Vossel