Assuming the two systems can already route between each other, just configure
udpu as your transport.
Example config:
http://lists.corosync.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-October/48.html
On Mar 24, 2013, at 11:59 AM, deep saran wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to setup a two node cluster where
On 3/24/13 12:58 PM, Robinson, Eric wrote:
In the simplest terms, we currently have resources:
A = drbd
B = filesystem
C = cluster IP
D thru J = mysql instances.
Resource group G1 consists of resources B through J, in that order, and is
dependent on resource A.
This fails over fine,
On 12/1/12 5:46 AM, Hermes Flying wrote:
Thank you for this!
One last thing I need to clear out before digging into your configuration
specs etc.
Since the pacemaker is a fail-over system rather than a load-balancing system
(like Red Hat) as you say, my understanding is that one of my
On 12/1/12 8:21 AM, Hermes Flying wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
First of all I didn't get if the VIP will migrate if Tomcat or load
balancer also fails. It will right?
If you configure Pacemaker correctly, yes.
Also if I understand this correctly, I can end up with VIP on both
nodes if
On 12/1/12 8:48 AM, Hermes Flying wrote:
Great help! Please allow me to trouble you with one last question.
If I get this, when I use fencing and the corosync fails then linux-2
will attempt to crash linux-1 and take over. At this point though
linux-1 won't try to do anything right? Since
track here? If you have any recommendations for my
setup (2 linux running: 2 LB/2Tomcat/2Databases) please let me know!
Thank you for your time!
*From:* David Coulson da...@davidcoulson.net
*To:* Hermes Flying flyingher
From your post on the drbd list it looks like your storage is messed up.
Post the output of crm_mon -1fr from both nodes. Guessing your drbd resource
didn't promote to master on one node because your drbd cluster is out of sync.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 2, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Yount, William D
On 6/4/12 7:23 AM, alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi
Some questions about HA/Pacemaker and Load Balancing :
- is it possible and safe to make working together LVS (based on hearbeat
software) and Pacemaker/corosync ?
LVS isn't based on heartbeat. You can use pacemaker to manage your VIPs,
What is your clustering software and what is the configuration? Also
post your DRBD configuration and the output from cat /proc/drbd during
each stage of your testing which reproduces the issue.
Maybe post some kernel logs too would be helpful. Simply switching
pri/sec on DRBD won't cause a
Why even use heartbeat then - Just manually ifconfig the interface.
On 4/23/12 7:39 AM, Net Warrior wrote:
Hi Nikita
This is the version
heartbeat-3.0.0-0.7
My aim is to, if node1 is powered off or losts it's ethernet
connection,. node2 wont make the failover automatically, I want to
On 3/22/12 2:43 PM, William Seligman wrote:
I still haven't solved the problem, but this advice has gotten me further than
before.
First, Lars was correct: I did not have execute permissions set on my fence
peer
scripts. (D'oh!) I turned them on, but that did not change anything:
11 matches
Mail list logo
