hi list!
i'm trying to set up an HA database cluster so designed: there are two
[master/slave] redundant servers with postgres and drbd managed by
heartbeat in crm mode. it works very well but now i've to replicate the
db to another similar db cluster to achieve a shadow/readonly copy. i
It doesn't. There were several attempts to create one but without success yet.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:05 AM, marco perugini m.perug...@4it.it wrote:
hi list!
i'm trying to set up an HA database cluster so designed: there are two
[master/slave] redundant servers with postgres and drbd
Serge Dubrouski wrote:
It doesn't. There were several attempts to create one but without success yet.
Err, really?
I think I was able to just run slony with my anything ra (search the
list).
Don't mix this up with being able to run postgres+slony in a
master/slave something. But running
solved! /var/log/ha-debug showed the reason: vserver not found
solution: ln -s /usr/sbin/vserver /etc/ha.d/resource.d/
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:03:19AM -0800, Mike Sweetser - Adhost wrote:
The reason for reboot was that the crmd encountered an
unrecoverable condition and exited. It is not clear what happened
to crmd. It could be a communication problem, though there's
nothing in the logs from the
We just had one of our two Heartbeat servers - in this case, the primary server
- do an emergency reboot earlier tonight, and I'm confused as to why. Here's
the sanitized version of the logs from right before the reboot occurred. Can
somebody tell me what happened and what I can do to make
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 12:30:41AM -0800, Mike Sweetser - Adhost wrote:
We just had one of our two Heartbeat servers - in this case,
the primary server - do an emergency reboot earlier tonight,
and I'm confused as to why. Here's the sanitized version of
the logs from right before the
The reason for reboot was that the crmd encountered an
unrecoverable condition and exited. It is not clear what happened
to crmd. It could be a communication problem, though there's
nothing in the logs from the lower layer (heartbeat). BTW, you
can prevent reboots by replacing crm yes with
Hi,
Can heartbeat be configured to run a script only once without that
script running a service?
Say for example that heartbeat is failing over and that some special
purpose script needs to run prior to starting an Oracle DB service which
is already running in standby mode on the fail to
EDIT: It would help if I actually attached the hb_report, wouldn't it?
:P
The reason for reboot was that the crmd encountered an unrecoverable
condition and exited. It is not clear what happened to crmd. It could
be a communication problem, though there's nothing in the logs from
the lower
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 05:38:02PM -0800, Patrick McShane wrote:
Hi,
I am a heartbeat newbie and have a question regarding Oracle-SE 10g
(standard edition) used in a two node active/standy heartbeat V2.x
configuration.
Our Oracle license limits what features are available to use
Hi,
I am a heartbeat newbie and have a question regarding Oracle-SE 10g
(standard edition) used in a two node active/standy heartbeat V2.x
configuration.
Our Oracle license limits what features are available to use with the
oracle-se 10g. We don't have OCFS or Dataguard. Our option is
Hi,
I'm not sure if this has been asked before but is it normal that
Heartbeat stops and starts all resources if an offline node comes back
online?
I have a 2 node cluster as test system right now with no location
constraints and no auto-fallback. I have one resource group and one
master / slave
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:11:07AM +0100, Tobias Appel wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this has been asked before but is it normal that
Heartbeat stops and starts all resources if an offline node comes back
online?
I have a 2 node cluster as test system right now with no location
Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 08:55 schrieb Vincent:
Hi all,
I have a problem setting up a cluster with two nodes, using
heartbeat 2.0.8 on a SLES 10. It just cannot start up normally !
(...)
Forget 2.0.8. Get at least a 2.1.3 version. Everything older than that is
buggy.
--
Dr.
Am Donnerstag, 27. November 2008 08:55 schrieb Vincent:
Hi all,
I have a problem setting up a cluster with two nodes, using
heartbeat 2.0.8 on a SLES 10
(...)
Since you use SLES10, the latest bugfixes are included in the SP2. Please
apply it.
--
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
MultiNET
I spoke to a developer regarding this and he recommended moving to 2.x.
I'm still looking for further details. Anyone have any additional information?
One of the systems in question is Linux 2.6.9, heartbeat
1.2.3.cvs.20050927, and glibc 2.3.4.
I discovered a thread
Ok, this seems to be related to a version mismatch between the
upgraded now and db02 which is at 2.1.3.
I'll see if I can reproduce locally - thanks for bringing this to my attention.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 21:52, Wolf Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/08 2:13 PM, Andrew Beekhof
On 11/20/08 2:13 PM, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got similar results irregardless if I used the normal heartbeat/pacemaker,
or if I have heartbeat-debug and pacemaker-debug installed as well.
Here's info with both debug packages installed: (cib.xml is the same as
before,
On 11/19/08 11:47 PM, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:48, Wolf Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang.
I have a 4 vm node cluster. (centos5)
I, using the gui, paused one node (db02) in the cluster.
All resources failed off of it.
I then shutdown
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 21:36, Wolf Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/19/08 11:47 PM, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:48, Wolf Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang.
I have a 4 vm node cluster. (centos5)
I, using the gui, paused one node (db02) in
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 15:36, Laurent Yin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I have a setup with two nodes, a master/slave drbd and a mysqlgroup
containing a filesystem resource, a mysql ressource, a VIP IPAddr2 resource,
and a mail resource.
I have noticed that sometimes, after a
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:48, Wolf Noble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang.
I have a 4 vm node cluster. (centos5)
I, using the gui, paused one node (db02) in the cluster.
All resources failed off of it.
I then shutdown heartbeat,
Chkconfig -levels 2345 heartbeat off
yum remove
Hello,
I have a few set of boxes that are running Heartbeat and relaying each
other in case of failure. The set up is working properly, but I see the
following errors in my logs and was wondering if they were normal (I
suppose not):
Nov 16 04:03:33 openvz-2 heartbeat: [24996]: ERROR:
On Monday 17 November 2008 14:56:24 Jean-Michel Philippon-Nadeau wrote:
Hello,
I have a few set of boxes that are running Heartbeat and relaying each
other in case of failure. The set up is working properly, but I see the
following errors in my logs and was wondering if they were
Thanks for the reply Mark,
Mark Watts wrote:
My guess would be SELinux getting in the way, expecially since you say you're
using CentOS 5.2, which has SELinux enabled by default.
I do not have SELINUX enabled on any machine. I disable it at the
installation time.
In /etc/selinux/config I
Hello List.
I came in this morning and found that one of my clusters had a failure
over the weekend. This cluster is not yet production, but is slated to
become a production cluster soon, so I am hoping I can get some
help/advice to keep this type of failure from occurring again in the
future.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:09, fulvio fabiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
thanks for the support,
I insert the nvpair node into the
crm_config/cluster_properties_set/attributes node. Is this the right
position?
yes
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Hi Andrew,
we tests this configuration and works fine.
Thanks
Fulvio
2008/11/5 Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:09, fulvio fabiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andrew,
thanks for the support,
I insert the nvpair node into the
Hi Andrew,
thanks for the support,
I insert the nvpair node into the
crm_config/cluster_properties_set/attributes node. Is this the right
position?
Thanks a lot
Fulvio
2008/11/4 Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 16:49, fulvio fabiani [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The value
Hi Fulvio,
I don't see any attachment on your mail ... Forgotten ?
Nikita Michalko
Am Montag, 3. November 2008 11:15 schrieb fulvio fabiani:
Hi all,
we have a clustered installation of Heartbeat 2.1.3 that manages Apache /
VIP resource in Active / Standby configuration.
What we
Hi all,
we have a clustered installation of Heartbeat 2.1.3 that manages Apache /
VIP resource in Active / Standby configuration.
What we observe at machine reboot is the Failover of Apache / VIP resource
group to a preferred destination (node_02). How can we avoid this behavior
and let the
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 14:23, fulvio fabiani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops,
I'm sorry.
In attach the cib.xml
2008/11/3 Nikita Michalko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Fulvio,
I don't see any attachment on your mail ... Forgotten ?
Nikita Michalko
Am Montag, 3. November 2008 11:15 schrieb
oops,
I'm sorry.
In attach the cib.xml
2008/11/3 Nikita Michalko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Fulvio,
I don't see any attachment on your mail ... Forgotten ?
Nikita Michalko
Am Montag, 3. November 2008 11:15 schrieb fulvio fabiani:
Hi all,
we have a clustered installation of Heartbeat
The value we set is *INFINITY*, please find below an extract of the attached
cib.xml:
nvpair id=default_resource_stickiness
name=default_resource_stickiness value=INFINITY/
the configuration is written into the meta_attributes/attributes for
apache_rg group.
Best regards
Fulvio Fabiani
I got this error message today for my test cluster. I looked trough linux-ha
archive and googled and found some problems with special dates like febrary
29 or change of year. But today is the last day of october! No special day.
Must I really wait until tomorrow to get a running heartbeat again?
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 00:22, Andreas Mock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Pinkerton H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 30.10.08 22:55:22
An: 'linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org' linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Betreff: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Cluster Monitoring
Hi David
Am Freitag, 31. Oktober 2008 09:59 schrieb Annette Jäkel:
I got this error message today for my test cluster. I looked trough
linux-ha archive and googled and found some problems with special dates
like febrary 29 or change of year. But today is the last day of october! No
special day. Must I
On 2008-10-31T09:59:39, Annette Jäkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got this error message today for my test cluster. I looked trough linux-ha
archive and googled and found some problems with special dates like febrary
29 or change of year. But today is the last day of october! No special day.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 13:09, Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 12:42 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
- See my bug reports for unexpected errors during compile. Configure
does not check for all nescessary packages.
Can't find any of these either.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:53:07AM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 13:09, Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 12:42 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
- See my bug reports for unexpected errors during compile. Configure
does not
I'm looking at how to event monitor a heartbeat cluster. Is there something
around that can trigger a script based on key words without having to do syslog
log scraping.
I reallly want to avoid: tail -f /var/log/heartbeat | grep XXX
Ideally if a resource is stopped I would like the
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Pinkerton H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 30.10.08 22:55:22
An: 'linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org' linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Betreff: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Cluster Monitoring
Hi David,
Ideally if a resource is stopped I would like the monitoring
Hi there, I'm using Heartbeat 2.1.4 and DRBD 8.2.7. I have a problem using
Split Brain during recovering.
I have two node cluster in active/pasive way. During normal operation, the
master node runs drbd as primary role, while slave node runs as secondary
role. For testing purposes, I unplug the
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:17:02PM +0200, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
we are testing debian lenny at the moment. We are running debian etch
successfull with heartbeat2 with crm disabled. On debian lenny we want to
run heartbeat2 with crm enabled
Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 12:42 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:17:02PM +0200, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
we are testing debian lenny at the moment. We are running debian etch
successfull with heartbeat2 with crm
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:09:54PM +0100, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 12:42 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:17:02PM +0200, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
we are testing debian lenny at
Hi,
unfortunatelly 2.1.4 did not find its way into lenny.
You really should consider to build your own packages or use heartbeat
from sid.
Forget about the GUI!!
Good basic documentaion stuff is available at
http://clusterlabs.org/wiki/images/f/fb/Configuration_Explained.pdf
BR
Bjoern
Am Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 13:32 schrieb Björn Boschman:
Hi,
unfortunatelly 2.1.4 did not find its way into lenny.
You really should consider to build your own packages or use heartbeat
from sid.
Forget about the GUI!!
Good basic documentaion stuff is available at
On 2008-10-24T15:44:20, Alik Hochner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd really prefer working with an rpm rather then compling, does anyone know
of this kind of distro exists?
z-Series packages are available on SLES10, including support from
Novell.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE
Hi,
I'm trying to implement HA on 2 z/linux servers. I'm trying to install
Heartbeat on those servers.
I've searched all over for a packaged binary for Redhat v5.2 on zSeries
(s390x) but found none.
I found a post saying that the way to do it on s390x is to compile the
source. So I tried doing it
Hello,
we are testing debian lenny at the moment. We are running debian etch
successfull with heartbeat2 with crm disabled. On debian lenny we want
to run heartbeat2 with crm enabled but we have a lot of problems.The
GUI forgets attributes of resources and is not usable to configure the
Hello,
we are testing debian lenny at the moment. We are running debian etch
successfull with heartbeat2 with crm disabled. On debian lenny we want to run
heartbeat2 with crm enabled but we have a lot of problems.The GUI forgets
attributes of resources and is not usable to configure the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hello,
we are testing debian lenny at the moment. We are running debian etch
successfull with heartbeat2 with crm disabled. On debian lenny we want to run
heartbeat2 with crm enabled but we have a lot of problems.The GUI forgets
attributes of resources and is not
I've been using heartbeat for years, since the 1.0 days, and I've never
seen anything quite like this before. I'm running
heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos (RPM from the CentOS standard repository)
on an x86_64 machine running (obviously) CentOS 5. I'm not using the v2
features though, it's a standard
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Vincent wrote:
hi all,
I am now troubled with making a decision on which heartbeat release
(such as 2.1.4, 2.0.8 and sles10-sp2-rc2)to be used on my clusters. And I
think my clusters only need heartbeat's basic functions. I have read
On Oct 13, 2008, at 9:03 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Vincent wrote:
hi all,
I am now troubled with making a decision on which heartbeat
release (such as 2.1.4, 2.0.8 and sles10-sp2-rc2)to be used on my
clusters. And I think my
hi all,
I am now troubled with making a decision on which heartbeat release
(such as 2.1.4, 2.0.8 and sles10-sp2-rc2)to be used on my clusters. And I
think my clusters only need heartbeat's basic functions. I have read the
change log from heartbeat 2.0.8 to heartbeat 2.1.4, but I find
I'm thinking to install HA Linux cluster with 2 nodes, where srv A has pkg 1
while srv B has pkg 2.
A and B have both serial and ethernet channels while IPFAIL checks gateway
reachability.
I need to keep services 1,2 on cluster when gateway is unreachable, just only
for all clients which are in
Hello,
I have a problem with Heartbeat and DRBD. I have 2 aktiv Nodes running
on Debian Linux. The DRBD Drive is splitted into 2 parts. Each Node own
one DRBD partition and run his services on the drive. The Installation
runs since one year and without problems. Since one week i get problem
that
Am Dienstag, 23. September 2008 13:43 schrieb Christian Baus:
Hello,
I have a problem with Heartbeat and DRBD. I have 2 aktiv Nodes running
on Debian Linux. The DRBD Drive is splitted into 2 parts. Each Node own
one DRBD partition and run his services on the drive. The Installation
runs
Hello everyone,
I have installed heartbeat to my two-computer cluster successfully. I have
tested the app and it is working perfect but i have a problem.
I want to do a back-up system. When master computer fails, the slave must
gain the control(which heartbeat does). Addition to this, after
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hello everyone,
I have installed heartbeat to my two-computer cluster successfully. I have
tested the app and it is working perfect but i have a problem.
I want to do a back-up system. When master computer fails, the slave must
gain the control(which heartbeat
Hello, I am a very new user of Linux-HA, as you will quickly realize as
you read this. :) We are putting together a system that is not HA in the
clustered sense, but does require good availability. We want the system
to be able to reboot if it somehow gets extremely hosed/bogged
down/whatever,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 10:57:40AM -0700, Lamarre, Michael wrote:
Hello, I am a very new user of Linux-HA, as you will quickly realize as
you read this. :) We are putting together a system that is not HA in the
clustered sense, but does require good availability. We want the system
to be able
On 2008-09-15T16:03:47, Brian Reichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found that for a heartbeat v1 one-system node, you cannot
have auto_failback set to off (or on); heartbeat never really
completely starts.
Not to mention that v1 with just one node doesn't make any sense.
v1 only protects
On 2008-09-11T09:41:24, Jeffery Soo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lars
I wish I could not believe it either :)
The services were running fine but the heartbeat service itself (I mean
literally the heartbeat service, but the services heartbeat is supposed to
control were still running fine
Hi Lars
service heartbeat status
I checked the logs of both heartbeats and the last thing in those logs
(between the time heartbeat was stopped), is the daily memory stats of
heartbeat but nothing else until I restarted heartbeat on the node it
was stopped on.
I did not actually check for
On 2008-09-10T18:12:06, Jeffery Soo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both nodes don't have any firewall enabled and after 6 days, heartbeat
suddenly stopped itself.
There is no indication of this in the logs and also the other heartbeat
node didn't seem to detect this (that the active node's
Hi Lars
I wish I could not believe it either :)
The services were running fine but the heartbeat service itself (I mean
literally the heartbeat service, but the services heartbeat is supposed
to control were still running fine and active on the same node) was
stopped at some point and I don't
Both nodes don't have any firewall enabled and after 6 days, heartbeat
suddenly stopped itself.
There is no indication of this in the logs and also the other heartbeat
node didn't seem to detect this (that the active node's heartbeat was
stopped).
Both nodes other than that normally seem to
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 16:04, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Paul Walsh wrote:
Don't get me wrong. I'm a great fan of Heartbeat and am keep to see it
develop and make further use of it. I now have 3 clusters up and running
with 2.1.3 and DRBD and if I could get it
On Sep 7, 2008, at 6:51 PM, Andrew McGill wrote:
On Sunday 07 September 2008 16:35:34 you wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 07:08, Andrew McGill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thursday 04 September 2008 21:12:31 Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Paul Walsh wrote:
Lars
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
the confusion - people tend to want to use the latest/newest version
so perhaps see v1 as inferior)?
It _is_ inferior.
Its easier to configure because it doesn't do even half what v2 can.
Granted.
V1 lets you define groups that run here or there... of course the
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Is this sufficiently clear?
http://www.clusterlabs.org/mw/Install#READ_ME_FIRST
Ahem! *blush* (Stands in front of mirror and says RTFM) ;)
--
Paul Walsh
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Paul Walsh wrote:
Don't get me wrong. I'm a great fan of Heartbeat and am keep to see it
develop and make further use of it. I now have 3 clusters up and running
with 2.1.3 and DRBD and if I could get it working on Solaris (SPARC)
with Oracle and our EMC SAN, I'd have
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:14:06PM +, Todd, Conor wrote:
I'm running the 2.1.4-2.1 build on SUSE, and I get the following error when I
try to start hb_gui:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/hb_gui, line 30, in ?
from xml.parsers.xmlproc.xmldtd import
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Paul Walsh wrote:
I think there's been a certain amount of confusion with regards to
Heartbeat and Pacemaker (and their versions), so I
wonder if those involved (Lars, Andrew, Alan?) would clarify the
following assumptions:
Pacemaker 0.6.x can be used as a
On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Paul Walsh wrote:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Well, heartbeat doesn't require pacemaker. Pacemaker doesn't require
heartbeat (it can also run on openAIS). But yes, they can cooperate.
I take it that's because Heartbeat can still use a v1 style
configuration
Thanks very much -- that worked!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dejan Muhamedagic
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 9:41 AM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat 2.1.4-2.1 hb_gui problem
On Wed, Sep
On Thursday 04 September 2008 21:12:31 Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Paul Walsh wrote:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
Well, heartbeat doesn't require pacemaker. Pacemaker doesn't require
heartbeat (it can also run on openAIS). But yes, they can cooperate.
I take it that's
I'm running the 2.1.4-2.1 build on SUSE, and I get the following error when I
try to start hb_gui:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/hb_gui, line 30, in ?
from xml.parsers.xmlproc.xmldtd import load_dtd_string
ImportError: No module named xmlproc.xmldtd
Are we missing a
On 2008-08-28T18:03:08, Shiney James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am using Heartbeat version 2.1.3. I find that heartbeat shutdown hangs. It
stops all of the resources except the ldirectord. None of the heartbeat
processes are killed.
Upgrade to
a) heartbeat 2.99.0 + pacemaker 0.6.6
Betreff: Re: AW: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat 2.1.3-23.1 (where is the stable
version HA/pacemaker)
Hi Michael, i all,
but that does not answer the very first question:
Which version is the current stable version of HA/pacemaker?
What I understood so far:
a) 2.1.3 with 0.6.6 is stable
Auftrag von Nikita Michalko
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 15:00
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat 2.1.3-23.1 (where is the
stable version HA/pacemaker)
Hi Maddin,
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 14:29 schrieb Mega Mailingliste:
Hi Andreas, Hi all
PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot
Cheers
Maddin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ha-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Nikita Michalko
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. August 2008 15:00
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat 2.1.3-23.1
On 2008-08-28T19:50:42, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that sounds great. Do you know how much this packages differ from the
suse-10.2 packages???
different dependancies. not sure i'd mix them personally
Not for anything worth running in production, for sure not.
I'd honestly
Hi all,
I am using Heartbeat version 2.1.3. I find that heartbeat shutdown hangs. It
stops all of the resources except the ldirectord. None of the heartbeat
processes are killed. After 20 minutes shutdown_escalation_timer kicks in
and tries to shutdown. At this time, tengine and pengine are
Nobody who knows where i can get this??
Is 2.99 beta or not?
Hi dude's,
where i can find these heartbeat-packages for opensuse-10.2:
- pacemaker-heartbeat-0.6.5-8.2
- heartbeat-common-2.1.3-23.1
- heartbeat-2.1.3-23.1
- heartbeat-resources-2.1.3-23.1
- pacemaker-pygui-1.4-1.6
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 10:55 schrieb Mega Mailingliste:
Nobody who knows where i can get this??
Is 2.99 beta or not?
Yes. It declared beta.
--
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
MultiNET Services GmbH
Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
Fax: +49 - 89
combination?
Best regards
Andreas Mock
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 27.08.08 11:48:20
An: General Linux-HA mailing list linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat 2.1.3-23.1
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 10:55
] [mailto:linux-ha-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Andreas Mock
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 13:31
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: AW: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat 2.1.3-23.1 (where is the stable
version HA/pacemaker)
Hi Michael, i all,
but that does not answer the very first
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:47, Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 10:55 schrieb Mega Mailingliste:
Nobody who knows where i can get this??
Is 2.99 beta or not?
Yes. It declared beta
a very very stable, practically final apart from some more dead
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 15:57, Mega Mailingliste
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi dude's,
where i can find these heartbeat-packages for opensuse-10.2:
- pacemaker-heartbeat-0.6.5-8.2
- heartbeat-common-2.1.3-23.1
- heartbeat-2.1.3-23.1
- heartbeat-resources-2.1.3-23.1
-
Hi dude's,
where i can find these heartbeat-packages for opensuse-10.2:
- pacemaker-heartbeat-0.6.5-8.2
- heartbeat-common-2.1.3-23.1
- heartbeat-2.1.3-23.1
- heartbeat-resources-2.1.3-23.1
- pacemaker-pygui-1.4-1.6
why do you want these specific versions?
Because this
On 2008-08-27T16:49:23, Mega Mailingliste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why do you want these specific versions?
Because this is one of these versions which runs stable on our environment.
The other versions before, got us into trouble with some failovers and other
stuff. So why we should use a
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ha-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Lars Marowsky-Bree
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. August 2008 18:17
An: General Linux-HA mailing list
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat 2.1.3-32.1
On 2008-08-27T16:49:23, Mega
On 2008-08-27T18:42:41, Mega Mailingliste [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right that's true, but where're using the suse build service since 3 or 4
installations and, I know thats my mistake, we forgot to save the rpm's
anywhere. How should know thats the rpm's changing so fast.
Sorry, the build
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:31 +, Todd, Conor wrote:
So, then, if I'm upgrading from 2.1.3 anyway, what's the transition to using
the pacemaker-heartbeat-* packages like? Will I lose my cluster
configuration? Will it be compatible with 2.1.3 nodes?
You can't really lose it. You put the
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:35, Ivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 21:31 +, Todd, Conor wrote:
So, then, if I'm upgrading from 2.1.3 anyway, what's the transition to using
the pacemaker-heartbeat-* packages like? Will I lose my cluster
configuration? Will it be
501 - 600 of 1067 matches
Mail list logo
