Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> There have been people asking for these in the past so I thought it
> worth mentioning that, as of yesterday, support for RHEL and CentOS has
> been added to the build service.
> We also recently got support for Debian Etch and Ubuntu 7.10 on x86_64.
>
> The current list of
There have been people asking for these in the past so I thought it
worth mentioning that, as of yesterday, support for RHEL and CentOS
has been added to the build service.
We also recently got support for Debian Etch and Ubuntu 7.10 on x86_64.
The current list of supported targets for pre-co
Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
What it wont do is move to a node where the resource has _already_
failed.
That's my point.
The rationale is that if something happened on nodeX enough times to
cause the resource migrate away, then there is unlikely to be any
point trying nodeX again until the a
On Jan 24, 2008, at 11:59 AM, GAUTIER Hervé wrote:
Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On Jan 24, 2008, at 10:20 AM, GAUTIER Hervé wrote:
Hi there !
As Sylvain, I don't understand how HeartBeat (and in particular
PaceMaker) ensure high availability of a service (application
resource) if it is
Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On Jan 24, 2008, at 10:20 AM, GAUTIER Hervé wrote:
Hi there !
As Sylvain, I don't understand how HeartBeat (and in particular
PaceMaker) ensure high availability of a service (application
resource) if it is not possible to configure automatic failover in
case of
On Jan 24, 2008, at 10:20 AM, GAUTIER Hervé wrote:
Hi there !
As Sylvain, I don't understand how HeartBeat (and in particular
PaceMaker) ensure high availability of a service (application
resource) if it is not possible to configure automatic failover in
case of resource failure needed
Hi there !
As Sylvain, I don't understand how HeartBeat (and in particular
PaceMaker) ensure high availability of a service (application resource)
if it is not possible to configure automatic failover in case of
resource failure needed by the service ?
How people configure HB to ensure the
On Jan 24, 2008, at 9:47 AM, Sylvain MALAVIEILLE wrote:
Hello.
Testing Heartbeat v2.1.2 I'm trying to configure failover.
I'm looking for initiate a failover on a failed monitored resource.
I have been doing that unsing the "default-failure-stickiness", but
when the two node scores (computed
Hello.
Testing Heartbeat v2.1.2 I'm trying to configure failover.
I'm looking for initiate a failover on a failed monitored resource.
I have been doing that unsing the "default-failure-stickiness", but when
the two node scores (computed by heartbeat) are negative the resource is
stopped.
Is th
On Jan 21, 2008, at 11:01 AM, Sylvain MALAVIEILLE wrote:
Thanks for your answers.
My feeling is that heartbeat seams to be an insteresting cluster
software, but I am asking me some questions about resources and
failover capabilities.
My constatation is that start and stop orders are not
Thanks for your answers.
My feeling is that heartbeat seams to be an insteresting cluster
software, but I am asking me some questions about resources and failover
capabilities.
My constatation is that start and stop orders are not respected in
the traces.
Is it normal ?
correct - ordering
On Jan 17, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Sylvain MALAVIEILLE wrote:
I'am testing heartbeat 2.1.2 (using crm) and I have some questions
about resources.
My questions :
1)
I can see in traces (/var/log/ha-debug) lines like that :
pengine[6084]: 2008/01/15_13:42:00 notice: StartRsc:
anaisrh4-1
First thanks for your answer.
Sorry my english is not very fluent (I'm french).
1)
I can see in traces (/var/log/ha-debug) lines like that :
pengine[6084]: 2008/01/15_13:42:00 notice: StartRsc: anaisrh4-1
Start resource_ip_alias_eth0
others start resources ...
pengine[6084]: 2008/01/15_13:42:
Hello Sylvain,
I will answer you inline, althought I must admit my responses might not
solve your questions completely:
On Jan 17, 2008 12:26 PM, Sylvain MALAVIEILLE <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'am testing heartbeat 2.1.2 (using crm) and I have some questions about
> resources.
>
> My questio
I'am testing heartbeat 2.1.2 (using crm) and I have some questions about
resources.
My questions :
1)
I can see in traces (/var/log/ha-debug) lines like that :
pengine[6084]: 2008/01/15_13:42:00 notice: StartRsc: anaisrh4-1
Start resource_ip_alias_eth0
others start resources ...
peng
I'am testing heartbeat 2.1.2 (using crm) and I have some questions about
resources.
My questions :
1)
I can see in traces (/var/log/ha-debug) lines like that :
pengine[6084]: 2008/01/15_13:42:00 notice: StartRsc: anaisrh4-1
Start resource_ip_alias_eth0
others start resources ...
peng
Deja,
The logs.
Notice the setting may be some differrent from what I discribed because I am
doing investigation.
Also, the time is not synced up between the 2 servers. The real sequence is:
1. start heartbeat on server f1 (whose drbd is inconsistant, and peer drbd
not online) --> messages.f1.h
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:09:37AM +0800, Tonglu Yi wrote:
> Because that would be involve too much code change and testing working
> and our time table is very tight
A reply to a wrong message perhaps?
Thanks,
Dejan
> On Jan 16, 2008 1:12 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Because that would be involve too much code change and testing working
and our time table is very tight
On Jan 16, 2008 1:12 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:51:48PM +0800, Tonglu Yi wrote:
> > Hi Thomas
> > Thanks.
> >
> > But I am using heart
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:51:48PM +0800, Tonglu Yi wrote:
> Hi Thomas
> Thanks.
>
> But I am using heartbeat 2.1.2 with release 1 style configuration, and it is
> impossible to change to use release 2 configuration.
>
> Actually what I expect heartbeat to do is that at startup time, heartbe
On Jan 15, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Tonglu Yi wrote:
Hi Thomas
Thanks.
But I am using heartbeat 2.1.2 with release 1 style configuration,
and it is
impossible to change to use release 2 configuration.
because?
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.
Hi Thomas
Thanks.
But I am using heartbeat 2.1.2 with release 1 style configuration, and it is
impossible to change to use release 2 configuration.
Actually what I expect heartbeat to do is that at startup time, heartbeat
goes to stanby if there is any resource failed to start, and let the other
Hello Tonglu,
the following setup works with heartbeat-2.1.3 and drbd-8.1.3:
cibadmin -U -X '
Hi,
I am running heartbeat 2.1.2 and drbd 8.0.6. the file /etc/ha.d/haresources
are like the following:
s2 drbddisk IPaddr::172.22.11.19/24 IPaddr::10.80.1.19/24
The 2 servers are named s1 and s2.
When s1 starts up, heartbeat tries to start drbd resource. It will fail
because drbd data is incon
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:58:17AM -0500, Gary Schlachter wrote:
> Dejan,
>
> I started there. However, the problem I had was that I could not
> install 2.1.3 on Fedora Core 1 since it needed later versions of other
> RPMs. I can make 2.1.3 on FC1 but when I try to package heartbeat,
Dejan,
I started there. However, the problem I had was that I could not
install 2.1.3 on Fedora Core 1 since it needed later versions of other
RPMs. I can make 2.1.3 on FC1 but when I try to package heartbeat, I
get missing libnet-devel, openhpi-devel, gnutls-devel, OpenIPMI-devel.
Is
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:22:48AM -0500, Gary Schlachter wrote:
>I have a problem with heartbeat dying. I have a 3 node cluster running
> HA 2.0.8 on Fedora Core 1. They are providing a single IP address
> resource. They are using eth0 as the heartbeat mechanism. If I disconnect
>
I have a problem with heartbeat dying. I have a 3 node cluster
running HA 2.0.8 on Fedora Core 1. They are providing a single IP
address resource. They are using eth0 as the heartbeat mechanism. If I
disconnect the eth0 cable from the node which is providing the IP
address, one of the ot
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 9:07 AM
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: [Linux-HA] heartbeat management software
Hello,
The main disadventage of using heartbeat is that there is no management
software which do stop/start/recover/migrate services and so on...
In the attachement You
Hello,
The main disadventage of using heartbeat is that there is no management
software which do stop/start/recover/migrate services and so on...
In the attachement You have script which resolve it in a lot of cases.
It works good with version 2.0.8 and it wasn't tested with 2.1.x
# /etc/rc.d/in
Hello,
My cluster had a hiccup today. Primary node was manually soft-rebooted by
someone, and DRBD on secondary node was on a loop trying to start.
I browsed the Filesystem RA, and i see it uses fuser to try and remove
processes attached to the fs. Obviously this didn't work, as fuser does not
re
On Dec 19, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-12-19T11:32:12, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i prefer to use the "crm respawn" directive which disables the fast-
fail
logic^.
when a non-transient problem like this occurs and heartbeat is
started at
boot time (wh
On 2007-12-19T11:32:12, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i prefer to use the "crm respawn" directive which disables the fast-fail
> logic^.
> when a non-transient problem like this occurs and heartbeat is started at
> boot time (which is the normal thing to do), you have about 2s to i
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:34:38AM +0100, Fernando Iglesias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a bit strange problem with cibadmin, I should replace actual
> cib.xmlwith a new hand-edited
> cib.xml, so I executed:
>
> cibadmin -R -x /path/to/newfile/cib.xml, but next error is shown:
>
> Call cib_replace
Hi,
I've a bit strange problem with cibadmin, I should replace actual
cib.xmlwith a new hand-edited
cib.xml, so I executed:
cibadmin -R -x /path/to/newfile/cib.xml, but next error is shown:
Call cib_replace failed (-45): Update was older than existing configuration
But Im sure it's not possibl
On Dec 19, 2007, at 8:47 AM, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote:
Hi,
I installed a development version in the following procedures.
1)Initial installation of RHEL5(Update1).
2)Installation of libnet.
3)Installation of Heartbeat development version(Heartbeat-Dev-
d739f7e38999).
4)Setting such as ha.cf
Bu
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 04:47:31PM +0900, HIDEO YAMAUCHI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed a development version in the following procedures.
>
> 1)Initial installation of RHEL5(Update1).
> 2)Installation of libnet.
> 3)Installation of Heartbeat development version(Heartbeat-Dev-d739f7e38999).
>
On Dec 18, 2007, at 5:35 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
On Tue 12/18/2007 12:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
in v2 mode you can't monitor the resource using the HA API... only
via
the CIB.
Yes, right. Figured that out when my ha api call for resourc
On Tue 12/18/2007 12:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>On Dec 17, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
>
>> On Mon 12/17/2007 1:36 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>>
>>> On Dec 14, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
>>>
On Fri 12/14/2007 1:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
> On Dec 14, 2007, at
On Dec 17, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
On Mon 12/17/2007 1:36 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
On Dec 14, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
On Fri 12/14/2007 1:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Scott Mann wrote:
On Thu 12/13/2007 3:09 PM, Andrew Beekhof said
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:34:29AM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 06/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:10:28PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > Would you be interested in the tiny diff's I had to make to the .spec
> > > file? Are there
On Mon 12/17/2007 1:36 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>On Dec 14, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri 12/14/2007 1:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>>
>>> On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Scott Mann wrote:
>>>
On Thu 12/13/2007 3:09 PM, Andrew Beekhof said:
> On Dec 13, 2007, a
On Dec 14, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
On Fri 12/14/2007 1:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Scott Mann wrote:
On Thu 12/13/2007 3:09 PM, Andrew Beekhof said:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
I'm seeing about a 2.5minute delay between the
On Fri 12/14/2007 1:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Scott Mann wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu 12/13/2007 3:09 PM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>>
>>> On Dec 13, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seeing about a 2.5minute delay between the time that
>>> heartbeat
>>
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:11:49PM -0500, Scott Mann wrote:
>
> On Thu 12/13/2007 8:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>
> >On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Scott Mann wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I have just g
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Scott Mann wrote:
On Thu 12/13/2007 3:09 PM, Andrew Beekhof said:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
I'm seeing about a 2.5minute delay between the time that
heartbeat
starts and the time that the IP address comes up on eth0:0 (if it
were 5minut
On Thu 12/13/2007 3:09 PM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>On Dec 13, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
> I'm seeing about a 2.5minute delay between the time that heartbeat
> starts and the time that the IP address comes up on eth0:0 (if it
> were 5minutes, I'd at least have a clue).
>>
On Dec 13, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Scott Mann wrote:
I'm seeing about a 2.5minute delay between the time that heartbeat
starts and the time that the IP address comes up on eth0:0 (if it
were 5minutes, I'd at least have a clue).
i depends on your configured deadtime IIRC.
what does ha.cf look like
On Thu 12/13/2007 8:04 AM, Andrew Beekhof said:
>On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Scott Mann wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have just gone from Hearbeat v1 to v2, largely because I needed
>>> the autojoin feature. I simpl
On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:06 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Scott Mann wrote:
Hello,
I have just gone from Hearbeat v1 to v2, largely because I needed
the autojoin feature. I simply converted my haresources file to a
cib.xml with the haresources2ci
Hi,
i have a simple fail-over heartbeat/drbd cluster set up. In each
server there are two network cards. One for internet access (WAN) and
one for internal communication and synchronization (LAN). If one node
looses internet connection (WAN) the other takes over all resources
as expected,
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Scott Mann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just gone from Hearbeat v1 to v2, largely because I needed the
> autojoin feature. I simply converted my haresources file to a cib.xml with
> the haresources2cib.py conversion script. I've figured out a few thin
Hello,
I have just gone from Hearbeat v1 to v2, largely because I needed the autojoin
feature. I simply converted my haresources file to a cib.xml with the
haresources2cib.py conversion script. I've figured out a few things, but there
are other things that I haven't found answers to yet. Please
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:34:29AM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 06/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:10:28PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > Would you be interested in the tiny diff's I had to make to the .spec
> > > file? Are
On 06/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:10:28PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > Would you be interested in the tiny diff's I had to make to the .spec
> > file? Are there maintenance released for v1?
>
> Yes. I think that it was Horms maintaini
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:10:28PM +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> On 05/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:16:16AM +, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Has anyone got Heartbeat 1.2.5 to compile and run on CentOS 5?
> >
On 05/12/2007, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:16:16AM +, Amos Shapira wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Has anyone got Heartbeat 1.2.5 to compile and run on CentOS 5?
> >
> > I downloaded the source but hit difficulties compiling it, presumably
> > bec
On Dec 4, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:34:43PM +0100, Spindler Michael wrote:
Hi all,
I hope it is not a too stupid question.
I want to use heartbeat 2.1.2-24 on RedHas AS 4 because in 2.1.2-3 (I
got centos-packages for this version), the lrmd i
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 04:16:16AM +, Amos Shapira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone got Heartbeat 1.2.5 to compile and run on CentOS 5?
>
> I downloaded the source but hit difficulties compiling it, presumably
> because it was never quite tweaked to run that platform.
Don't see a reason w
Hello,
Has anyone got Heartbeat 1.2.5 to compile and run on CentOS 5?
I downloaded the source but hit difficulties compiling it, presumably
because it was never quite tweaked to run that platform.
Thanks,
--Amos
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@list
Hi,
> > -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/xml.o
> > xml.c: In function `write_xml_file':
> > xml.c:618: warning: unused variable `in'
> > gmake[3]: *** [xml.lo] Error 1
> > gmake[3]: Leaving directory
> `/tmp/CRM-Devel-obs-2.1.2-24/lib/crm/common'
> > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> > gmake[2]: Leav
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:34:43PM +0100, Spindler Michael wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I hope it is not a too stupid question.
>
> I want to use heartbeat 2.1.2-24 on RedHas AS 4 because in 2.1.2-3 (I
> got centos-packages for this version), the lrmd is eating up all my
> cpu-time. I saw some fixes
Hi!
I have 1.2.5 version of HA Heartbeat over my two servers.
Now, I need to share multiple VLAN IP from this two server (about 20).
Is it 1.2.5 compatible with this?
Example:
SRV1
bond0 192.168.0.2(192.168.0.1 shared)
bond1 192.168.254.2 (192.168.254.1
On Dec 2, 2007, at 8:26 AM, Liron Amitzi wrote:
Hi everybody.
I'm working with heartbeat for a while and have a configuration
question.
My heartbeat is 2.0.2, and I'm using CRM to manage a group of
resources.
When a node fails, heartbeat tries to start it on the other node (I
have only 2)
Hi everybody.
I'm working with heartbeat for a while and have a configuration question.
My heartbeat is 2.0.2, and I'm using CRM to manage a group of resources.
When a node fails, heartbeat tries to start it on the other node (I have only
2). If starting the group fails, heartbeat is giving up and
Hi,
please try either lower-cased host/node names or use the patch I sent
yesterday. The problem is that heartbeat uses the lower-cased hostnames
as nodenames and membership list in the CCM. EVMS compares
case-sensitive. This means evms says your cluster node acquiring the
private container is not
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:18:51PM +0100, Urs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Already saw some similar problems on the list and elsewhere in the net.
> But there was never a real solution for my problem. Don't think i'm the
> only one who has/had this problem.
>
> I have two server (CentOS 5). Both runn
: attrd_ha_dispatch: Lost connection to heartbeat service.
JM
-Message d'origine-
De : Audet, Jean-Michel
Envoyé : Monday, November 26, 2007 4:30 PM
À : 'General Linux-HA mailing list'
Objet : RE: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat vs CIB
Hi again,
I am trying to merge the code from crm_mon since
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat vs CIB
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:47 PM, Audet, Jean-Michel wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
I had already used the walking node functions:
Here is the kind of information I am able to get:
MyNode1 type=normal
MyNode1 status=active
MyNode2 type=normal
MyNode2 status=a
l Linux-HA mailing list'
Objet : RE: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat vs CIB
Hi again,
I am trying to merge the code from crm_mon since Friday and I am always
hitting the wall on function set_working_set_defaults.
My code simply crash there and stop.
CRM_MON application compile and work fine. An
Audet
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Andrew Beekhof
Envoyé : Monday, November 26, 2007 1:49 PM
À : General Linux-HA mailing list
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat vs CIB
On Nov 26, 2007, at 5:47 PM, Audet, Jean-Michel wrote:
> Th
Thanks!
JM
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] De la part de Andrew Beekhof
Envoyé : Monday, November 26, 2007 10:17 AM
À : General Linux-HA mailing list
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat vs CIB
On Nov 23, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Audet, Jean-Michel wrote:
I am
the Master (Hot) node (Re. The node
that currently the DC).
Thanks!
JM
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Andrew Beekhof
Envoyé : Monday, November 26, 2007 10:17 AM
À : General Linux-HA mailing list
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat v
On Nov 23, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Audet, Jean-Michel wrote:
I am currently using Heartbeat v2 with a cib.xml file.
I need an Active/Standby (Master/Slave) configuration
I am a newbie and I need to connect my software to the heartbeat
daemons
using the client library and then do check pointing b
t;
> Thanks,
> Abhi.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dejan
> Muhamedagic
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:35 PM
> To: General Linux-HA mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat OCF IPaddr doesn't
s a large value.
Coz I waited & waited and the resource didn't restart last time...
Thanks,
Abhi.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dejan
Muhamedagic
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 4:35 PM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject:
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:30:52PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi ,
> I'm using heartbeat version 2.0.8 wherein I've configured an IP address
> alias resource using the heartbeat provided ocf resource IPaddr.
> However, inspite of having an operation to monitor this resource (
> monit
Hi ,
I'm using heartbeat version 2.0.8 wherein I've configured an IP address
alias resource using the heartbeat provided ocf resource IPaddr.
However, inspite of having an operation to monitor this resource (
monitor operation is default in all resources ), the resource is not
restarted when down.
I am currently using Heartbeat v2 with a cib.xml file.
I need an Active/Standby (Master/Slave) configuration
I am a newbie and I need to connect my software to the heartbeat daemons
using the client library and then do check pointing between my 2
applications to get the standby node in sync.
Hi Yan,
Thanks a lot for your help. I took out the evmsSCC
resource from the scenario, but I did not see any difference in the
system behavior, then I followed your suggestion and I manually tested
the EVMS commands from the CLI while both the nodes where in stand-by,
and I actually rea
On Nov 22, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Adrian Revill wrote:
Andrew,
Yes I agree there is a bug in the init script that it does return
the correct status. But the environment that heartbeat calls the
init script from must be causing the different behaviour.
As the same script (/etc/init.d/nfs) calle
Andrew,
Yes I agree there is a bug in the init script that it does return the
correct status. But the environment that heartbeat calls the init script
from must be causing the different behaviour.
As the same script (/etc/init.d/nfs) called with the same parameters
called from the command line
FWIW, the "Exploring HASF" document does NOT use private containers. It
uses shared containers, so you will need to adjust some things, in
particular the type of CSM container (shared -> private), and use the
evms_failover RA instead of the evmsSCC RA.
Yan
Chris wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Christian Zemella wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>Anybody out there managed to have EVMS container resources
>> properly failing over in a 2 node Heartbeat 2 cluster running on SLES
>> 10 SP1 ?
>
> I believe so... have you read the documentat
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes, I got that doc, however it goes through the integration of OCFS2
and Heartbeat2 using the command line, while my test are with the
usage of reiserfs (or ext3) and the hb_gui.
I mean, if the resource configuration in order to have the private
Hi Kazuki,
Thank you, you are exactly right.
I have checked the init scripts in RHEL4 and RHEL5, there is now a -2 on
the killproc nfs
Also your hint helped me find another solution which is on
http://linux-ha.org/DRBD/NFS where they make a custom stop script called
killnfsd
Thank you aga
On Nov 21, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Christian Zemella wrote:
Hi All,
Anybody out there managed to have EVMS container resources
properly failing over in a 2 node Heartbeat 2 cluster running on SLES
10 SP1 ?
I believe so... have you read the documentation below?
http://wiki.novell.com/imag
On Nov 21, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Adrian Revill wrote:
Hi
I am setting up a heartbeat 2.1.2 (obtained from the centos src rpm)
on RHEL5.1 and have hit a problem with nfs.
If i start heartbeat, it starts nfs OK, but when i stop heartbeat it
runs " /etc/init.d/nfs stop" and in ha-debug i can see
Hi, Adrian
The cause may be the change of /etc/init.d/nfs.
In my case, I used heartbeat-1.2.3 under CentOS4.3 and the nfsd worked
perfectly.
But under CentOS4.5, the nfsd became not to be killed by "/etc/init.d/nfs stop"
and failed the fail over.
The /etc/init.d/nfs script of CentOS4.3 called
Hi
I am setting up a heartbeat 2.1.2 (obtained from the centos src rpm) on
RHEL5.1 and have hit a problem with nfs.
If i start heartbeat, it starts nfs OK, but when i stop heartbeat it
runs " /etc/init.d/nfs stop" and in ha-debug i can see it saying it
stopped OK.
But it leaves the nfsd runni
Hi All,
Anybody out there managed to have EVMS container resources
properly failing over in a 2 node Heartbeat 2 cluster running on SLES
10 SP1 ?
In my lab I can only start and stop the resource on the node that has
the container assigned within evms, while if I shut down that node,
the fa
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:43:30AM +0100, Urs wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:47 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:32:11AM +0100, Urs wrote:
> > > Hello Dejan
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:18 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > >
Hello Dejan
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:18 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:18:51PM +0100, Urs wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Already saw some similar problems on the list and elsewhere in the net.
> > But there was never a real solution for my problem. Don't think i'
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 10:47 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:32:11AM +0100, Urs wrote:
> > Hello Dejan
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:18 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:18:51PM +0100, Urs wrote:
> > > > Hello,
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 08:32:11AM +0100, Urs wrote:
> Hello Dejan
>
> On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 16:18 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:18:51PM +0100, Urs wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Already saw some similar problems on the list and elsewhere in the
On Nov 15, 2007, at 6:22 AM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
The root cause seems to be that heartbeat is not providing client
status messages (to say that the crmd processes are active) once the
split-brain heals.
crmd[1350]: 2007/11/08_10:38:43 info: join_make_offer: Peer process
on
dl380g5c is not ac
> The root cause seems to be that heartbeat is not providing client
> status messages (to say that the crmd processes are active) once the
> split-brain heals.
>
> crmd[1350]: 2007/11/08_10:38:43 info: join_make_offer: Peer process on
> dl380g5c is not active (yet?)
> crmd[1350]: 2007/11/08_10:40:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:18:51PM +0100, Urs wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Already saw some similar problems on the list and elsewhere in the net.
> But there was never a real solution for my problem. Don't think i'm the
> only one who has/had this problem.
>
> I have two server (CentOS 5). Both runn
Hello,
Already saw some similar problems on the list and elsewhere in the net.
But there was never a real solution for my problem. Don't think i'm the
only one who has/had this problem.
I have two server (CentOS 5). Both running heartbeat and ldirectord. On
the same servers there are a SMTP serve
Hi,
General Linux-HA mailing list wrote:
> On 2007-11-13T14:18:50, "Henriques, Tiago" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > We are using Linux-HA Heartbeat in one of our products, and are now in
> > the process of collecting the information needed to export it t
901 - 1000 of 1262 matches
Mail list logo
