On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Andy Furtado <awf...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > Is it possible to setup an n-to-1 cluster configuration and have heartbeat > manage a different VIP for each virtual pair. > The n-to-1 configuration would have a single slave node, able to take over > for any one of the failed N masters at a time.
You'll want pacemaker on top of heartbeat for that. http://www.clusterlabs.org > In this configuration each masternode would have a staticip-addr and a VIP. > When the master fails, the VIP for that master is configured on the > slavenode, and the slave acts as that master. > Once the slavenode is acting as a master, it remains in this state and cannot > takeover of another failed master until the original masternode is restored, > and the original slave transitions back to the slave state. > > > Example configuration > masternodeA > staticip:10.1.1.1 > VIP:10.1.1.101 > > > masternodeB > staticip:10.1.1.2 > > VIP: 10.1.1.102 > > > slavenode > staticip:10.1.1.3 > > > If masternodeA fails, slavenode becomes active as masternodeA and is > configured with VIP 10.1.1.101 > If masternodeB fails, there is no failover available since slavenode is > currently acting as masternodeA > > > When masternodeA is restored, slavenode releases VIP 10.1.1.101, and is now > ready to take over for either masternodeA or masternodeB. > > > I understand this is not an ideal fail over solution, but one I must live > with until further design can be done. > > I've searched the internet, and the HA mailing lists without much success. > > Any info, or input would be appreciated. > > > Best Regards, > Andy > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
