-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you are using Multcast (MCAST) - could it be the case that the
switch/LAN dropped all Multicast packages for some time? As lot of
switches which are managed are dropping MCAST by default (at least
I got that feedback from customers) it could be
ailprd1:~/Desktop # corosync-objctl |grep member
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.ip=r(0) ip(192.168.7.11)
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.join_count=1
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.status=joined
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.201828544.ip=r(0) ip(192.168.7.12)
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 08:39 +0100, Emmanuel Saint-Joanis wrote:
2012/12/14 Muhammad Sharfuddin m.sharfud...@nds.com.pk
node1(ailprd1) IP:192.168.7.11
node2(ailprd2) IP:192.168.7.12
Its a two node active/passive cluster, running perfectly since
last
2012/12/14 Muhammad Sharfuddin m.sharfud...@nds.com.pk
ailprd1:~/Desktop # corosync-objctl |grep member
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.ip=r(0) ip(192.168.7.11)
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.join_count=1
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.status=joined
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:02 +0100, Emmanuel Saint-Joanis wrote:
ailprd1:~/Desktop # corosync-objctl |grep member
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.ip=r(0)
ip(192.168.7.11)
runtime.totem.pg.mrp.srp.members.185051328.join_count=1
please find me replies in-line
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:13 +0100, Fabian Herschel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you are using Multcast (MCAST)
yes
- could it be the case that the
switch/LAN dropped all Multicast packages for some time?
how can I verify or
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 16:47 +0500, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
please find me replies in-line
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:13 +0100, Fabian Herschel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As you are using Multcast (MCAST)
yes
so using Unicast instead of MCAST, would be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Muhammad,
also find my ansawer inline...
On 12/14/2012 12:55 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 16:47 +0500, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
please find me replies in-line
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 12:13 +0100, Fabian Herschel
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 14:09 +0100, Fabian Herschel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Muhammad,
also find my ansawer inline...
On 12/14/2012 12:55 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 16:47 +0500, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
please find me replies
On 12/14/2012 07:22 AM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 14:09 +0100, Fabian Herschel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Muhammad,
also find my ansawer inline...
On 12/14/2012 12:55 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 16:47 +0500,
Yes my customer running into problems often had cisco switches. The solution
always was ucast.
In my initial comment I did not wrote cisco not to blame them.
But as this is already discussed here I could also write that I needed my mcast
tester initionaly for a setup using such switches.
With
node1(ailprd1) IP:192.168.7.11
node2(ailprd2) IP:192.168.7.12
Its a two node active/passive cluster, running perfectly since last two
months, but yesterday both nodes were fenced(rebooted). Network
connectivity b/w both nodes is perfect, and cluster is running fine
again.
Help me know the
2012/12/14 Muhammad Sharfuddin m.sharfud...@nds.com.pk
node1(ailprd1) IP:192.168.7.11
node2(ailprd2) IP:192.168.7.12
Its a two node active/passive cluster, running perfectly since last two
months, but yesterday both nodes were fenced(rebooted). Network
connectivity b/w both nodes is
13 matches
Mail list logo
