On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Igor Chudov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:41 PM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Igor Chudov wrote:
Guys, I have a bit of clarification. In an attempt to avoid the timing
issues, an hour ago I tried adding a configuration change
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:05 PM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Igor Chudov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:41 PM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Igor Chudov wrote:
Guys, I have a bit of clarification. In an
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Igor Chudov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:05 PM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Igor Chudov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:41 PM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Igor Chudov wrote:
As I
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org on behalf of Igor Chudov
Sent: Thu 8/5/2010 9:47 PM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat does not take over if BOTH machines
arebootedat the same time
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM
: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org on behalf of Igor Chudov
Sent: Thu 8/5/2010 9:47 PM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat does not take over if BOTH machines
arebootedat the same time
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Pushkar Pradhan push...@ipvideosys.com
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat does not take over if BOTH machines
arebootedat the same time
I have the same problem, its not a huge issue for me but i wouldn't
mind fixing it.
If this issue is resolved id appreciate if the 'solution' is posted on-list.
Cheers,
Nick
On Mon, Aug 9
On Monday 09 August 2010 16:34, Pushkar Pradhan wrote:
So it seems other people also have this problem? I thought only Igor was
having this issue.
I've seen it a while back and my (vague) recollection is drbd was in
secondary/secondary state. However, I didn't investigate it back then.
Dima
: Thu 8/5/2010 9:47 PM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat does not take over if BOTH machines
arebootedat the same time
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Pushkar Pradhan push...@ipvideosys.com
wrote:
I set up two Ubuntu Lucid machines to serve as a two-node
: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat does not take over if BOTH machines
arebootedat the same time
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Pushkar Pradhan push...@ipvideosys.com
wrote:
I set up two Ubuntu Lucid machines to serve as a two-node Heartbeat
cluster without Corosync.
They support a DRBD service, IP
Forgive me if this is a lengthy email, this is my first HA issue and I've
included some logs at the end.
For the sake of privacy, I've used dummy IPs here. My master is
192.168.1.101, slave is 192.168.1.102, shared IP is 192.168.1.103
My servers at at Rackspace and the configurations were done
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org on behalf of Jim
Sent: Fri 8/6/2010 2:25 AM
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat startup causes shared IP to stop responding
Forgive me if this is a lengthy email, this is my first HA
}
exit 1
esac
exit $rc
From: linux-ha-bounces at lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha on behalf of Jim
Sent: Fri 8/6/2010 2:25 AM
To: linux-ha at lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat startup
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Pushkar Pradhan push...@ipvideosys.com wrote:
I set up two Ubuntu Lucid machines to serve as a two-node Heartbeat
cluster without Corosync.
They support a DRBD service, IP address, NFS and Samba services.
Things mostly work, and if I reboot one server, the
: [Linux-HA] heartbeat IPaddr problem
Hi ,
Try like this below in haresources file.
configvm1 IPaddr::192.168.1.100 drbddisk::r0
Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/usr/local::xfs
where
configvm1 your primary host name
192.168.1.100 is the floating IP.
r0 is resource in /etc/drbd.conf
20, 2010 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat IPaddr problem
Hi ,
Try like this below in haresources file.
configvm1 IPaddr::192.168.1.100 drbddisk::r0
Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/usr/local::xfs
where
configvm1 your primary host name
192.168.1.100 is the floating IP.
r0 is resource in /etc
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat IPaddr problem
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your answer, I tried the following:
configvm1 IPaddr::192.168.1.100 drbddisk::disk0
Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/replicated::ext3
but still have the same problem, no VIP attached to configvm1 eth0.
I finally decided
Hi ,
Try like this below in haresources file.
configvm1 IPaddr::192.168.1.100 drbddisk::r0
Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/usr/local::xfs
where
configvm1 your primary host name
192.168.1.100 is the floating IP.
r0 is resource in /etc/drbd.conf ( check out what u
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 03:41:11PM +1000, Jai wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask as it could be a drdb issue.
I have a Centos 5.2 with heartbeat-2.1.4-2.1 and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos.
After having tested various scenarios during construction, one being a reboot
Andrew Beekhof-3 wrote:
You should really think about upgrading to 3.0 + Pacemaker 1.0 (that
where the crm lives now).
http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/ --- EPEL =~ RHEL
2.1.4 is not supported.
That's not possible unfortunately. The company uses 2.1.4 all over the
place, so I
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Xeno1234 trash...@gmx.net wrote:
Andrew Beekhof-3 wrote:
You should really think about upgrading to 3.0 + Pacemaker 1.0 (that
where the crm lives now).
http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/ --- EPEL =~ RHEL
2.1.4 is not supported.
That's not possible
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Xeno1234 trash...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to setup a cluster using heartbeat. Unfortunatly it
does not do what I want to do. I am using heartbeat 2.1.4-11 on a readhat
system.
You should really think about upgrading to 3.0 + Pacemaker 1.0
Dear All,
I have fixed the group/user problem as mentioned earlier with the log
chown: `hacluster:haclient': invalid group
I am now getting only the followings while starting HB:
Starting High-Availability services: 1: Failure: (127) Device minor not
allocated
Command '/sbin/drbdsetup 1 role'
...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Q S Tahmeed
Sent: June-21-10 3:58 AM
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat Starting Issue
Dear All,
I have fixed the group/user problem as mentioned earlier with the log
chown
I may have solved my own problem. It appears that my init script wasn't
executing properly, so I instead used the wrapper provided here:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/ha-heartbeat-drbd.html
This seems to be working better. Sorry for the false alarm!
Joel
On May 20, 2010, at 10:56
Hello,
I am trying to install heartbeat 3.0.3 on Fedora 8 as non priveleged user from
sources. Is it not possible to install heartbeat from sources without being
root? I plan to deploy heartbeat on a busybox machine, which is separate from
my development machine.
I was able to make and make
Morning folks (morning where I am),
I just found out that during the same time frame, mysql reported via monit
that there were too many connections and could not connect to MySQL server
over the VIP.
Will the scenario of having the mysql clogging up the VIP, cause the
heartbeat to repetitively
Hi,
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 01:24:00PM -0700, Matthew F. Hymowitz wrote:
Hi
I am trying to use heartbeat 2.1.3
That's very old, you should really upgrade.
with the 1.0.3 resource
agents to move a iSCSI (LIO) target across two machines. The
two machines are named sedona and toltec.
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 08:50:21AM +0200, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2010 01:22:13 schrieb Dimitri Maziuk:
Cameron Smith wrote:
Yeah!
Since I already have that in place for http and mysql I just wanted to
know if there was anything unique I need to do for
Am Freitag, 7. Mai 2010 17:06:44 schrieb Lars Ellenberg:
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 08:50:21AM +0200, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2010 01:22:13 schrieb Dimitri Maziuk:
Cameron Smith wrote:
Yeah!
Since I already have that in place for http and mysql I just wanted
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
The only reason to do a postfix cluster is to deliver locally queued mail
after
a failover.
Ah! That's what I didn't think of.
In theory you could restart postfix w/ different config files: send
only on the passive node and full setup on the active.
Dima
Am Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2010 01:22:13 schrieb Dimitri Maziuk:
Cameron Smith wrote:
Yeah!
Since I already have that in place for http and mysql I just wanted to
know if there was anything unique I need to do for postfix config for
when it is running on primary (managed by heartbeat) and how
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote:
On 05/04/2010 07:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2010-04-25T11:39:10, Smaïne Kahlouch smain...@free.fr wrote:
Do we have to move from Heartbeat to OpenAIS ? Now or in the future ?
What are the differences between
On 05/06/2010 08:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
About the only time I start heartbeat is for a few days before a release.
And even then only for 1.0 releases, 1.1 is only tested against corosync.
Probably true, though the amount of testing LINBIT does on both
messaging layers is quite
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Florian Haas florian.h...@linbit.com wrote:
On 05/06/2010 08:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
About the only time I start heartbeat is for a few days before a release.
And even then only for 1.0 releases, 1.1 is only tested against corosync.
Probably true, though
Cameron Smith wrote:
Yeah!
Since I already have that in place for http and mysql I just wanted to know
if there was anything unique I need to do for postfix config for when it is
running on primary (managed by heartbeat) and how do I handle the sending of
system emails on the secondary
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Cameron Smith wrote:
I am currently using Heartbeat to manage http, mysql and a DRBD device
between two nodes.
I want to also manage Postfix with Heartbeat.
What things should I keep in mind in the configuration of Postfix so that
mail services are tied to the IP
On 2010-04-25T11:39:10, Smaïne Kahlouch smain...@free.fr wrote:
Do we have to move from Heartbeat to OpenAIS ? Now or in the future ?
What are the differences between these two project ?
Will the project heartbeat continue or will be replaced by
OpenAIS/Corosync.
In addition to what Florian
Am Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010 17:45:34 schrieb Cameron Smith:
I am currently using Heartbeat to manage http, mysql and a DRBD device
between two nodes.
I want to also manage Postfix with Heartbeat.
What things should I keep in mind in the configuration of Postfix so that
mail services are tied
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.comwrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Cameron Smith wrote:
I am currently using Heartbeat to manage http, mysql and a DRBD device
between two nodes.
I want to also manage Postfix with Heartbeat.
What things should I keep
Am Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010 20:19:02 schrieb Cameron Smith:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.comwrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Cameron Smith wrote:
I am currently using Heartbeat to manage http, mysql and a DRBD device
between two nodes.
I want to
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff mi...@multinet.dewrote:
Am Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010 20:19:02 schrieb Cameron Smith:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.comwrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Cameron Smith wrote:
I am currently using
On 05/04/2010 07:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2010-04-25T11:39:10, Smaïne Kahlouch smain...@free.fr wrote:
Do we have to move from Heartbeat to OpenAIS ? Now or in the future ?
What are the differences between these two project ?
Will the project heartbeat continue or will be replaced
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Cameron Smith wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.comwrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Cameron Smith wrote:
I am currently using Heartbeat to manage http, mysql and a DRBD device
between two nodes.
I want to also manage Postfix with
On 04/25/2010 11:39 AM, Smaïne Kahlouch wrote:
Hi everyone,
I know the question has already been asked.
see http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha/2009-March/036725.html
The answer is however not clear for me and i would like to have other
opinions.
Do we have to move from
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 16:24 -0700, Stephen Punak wrote:
Heartbeat appears to start just fine on all nodes, but none of them see each
other.
Any chance there is a firewall blocking the heartbeat packets? You'd
still see them with wireshark, but they would be blocked from getting to
the
Hi,
as already x-times mentioned, we don't have any crystall ball ;-)
- Version, configuration, logs ...???
Nikita Michalko
Am Montag, 15. März 2010 10:01 schrieb Liang Xiao Zhu:
Hi all,
I done everything but heartbeat works only when i use service heartbeat
stop, when i unplug the
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.0/html/Pacemaker_Explained/s-operation-defaults.html#s-operation-timeouts
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Carlos Eduardo Chiriboga Calderon
cchirib...@palosanto.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have a serious problem with my cluster: Sometimes, the
On Fri, February 19, 2010 00:05, Brian Witt wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from Heartbeat 2.1.4 (CRM-enabled) on CentOS 5
(using the epel packages) to the latest heartbeat 3.0.2 using packages
from http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm/ but am running into a Digest
comparision failed: error
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:56:52PM -0500, Carlos Eduardo Chiriboga Calderon
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to configure a heartbeat cluster with 2 nodes and a drbd
filesystem (the cib.xml is attached to this message).
The problem is that, when I try to move the resource from a node to
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Ilo Lorusso sneak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm busy setting an Active/Passive cluster using the below version of
all the above mentions software. Now i have a few question hope full
which will solve the problems I'm experience.
heartbeat-3.0.1-1.el5
Am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2010 10:30:20 schrieb pqy_java_web:
hi,all
Who can tell me ,where is Heartbeat for openSuse10.2?
no heartbeat any more. See www.clusterlabs.org
--
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
MultiNET Services GmbH
Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
Tel: +49 -
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:26:17AM -0500, Ruiyuan Jiang wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to the source code of the location of GUI
client? I downloaded the pre-compiled GUI client for Redhat
Enterprise server from opensuse site but I got memory fault
message when I launch it.
#
...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Dejan Muhamedagic
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 11:13 AM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat GUI Client
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:26:17AM -0500, Ruiyuan Jiang wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone point me to the source code
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:22:45AM -0500, David Sickmiller wrote:
I don't have autojoin in my ha.cf, and I believe it defaults to
autojoin none, so that wouldn't explain why heartbeat keeps
waiting
after all nodes have joined.
True. That should be fixed. Can you please open a
Of Dejan
Muhamedagic
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 3:51 AM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat waits for initdead even after all
nodes have joined
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:21:05PM -0500, David Sickmiller wrote:
Hi,
I was hoping
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:57:31PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:55:28PM -0500, David Sickmiller wrote:
I don't have autojoin in my ha.cf, and I believe it defaults to
autojoin none, so that wouldn't explain why heartbeat keeps waiting
after all nodes
I don't have autojoin in my ha.cf, and I believe it defaults to
autojoin none, so that wouldn't explain why heartbeat keeps
waiting
after all nodes have joined.
True. That should be fixed. Can you please open a bugzilla for
this issue,
Thanks for your help! I've filed this as Bug 2311
: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 3:51 AM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] heartbeat waits for initdead even after all
nodes have joined
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:21:05PM -0500, David Sickmiller wrote:
Hi,
I was hoping to configure my 2-node cluster to start as soon
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:21:05PM -0500, David Sickmiller wrote:
Hi,
I was hoping to configure my 2-node cluster to start as soon as both
nodes were present but wait up to 15 minutes if the other node was
missing upon system startup. In my case, a delay of several minutes is
--- On Fri, 1/8/10, Carlos Eduardo Chiriboga Calderon
cchirib...@palosanto.com wrote:
From: Carlos Eduardo Chiriboga Calderon cchirib...@palosanto.com
Subject: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat and Lotus Domino?
To: General Linux-HA mailing list linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Date: Friday, January 8, 2010,
Hi Harakiri, thanks for your answer,
Because, the Lotus Domino's replication is already working with another
remote server.
We have many applications with Lotus Domino, the master server is in
another city and, I would like the local Lotus Domino server to be a
cluster with heartbeat.
I'm
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 06:50:38PM +0800, Javen Wu wrote:
Hi Folks,
I wrote a simple client by use of the Heartbeat client API and build it on
the top of the heartbeat 3.0.
My client is to form a simple private multi-node cluster and support
autojoin.
--%--segment of my
The system was reboot automatically after I set crm to yes :(
%===
Jan 05 19:08:52 na40-58 crmd: [6104]: info: crmd_init: Starting crmd
Jan 05 19:08:52 na40-58 crmd: [6104]: info: G_main_add_SignalHandler: Added
signal handler for signal 17
Jan 05 19:08:52 na40-58 heartbeat: [6091]: WARN:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:15:24PM +0800, Javen Wu wrote:
The system was reboot automatically after I set crm to yes :(
Use crm respawn instead of crm yes then.
%===
Jan 05 19:08:52 na40-58 crmd: [6104]: info: crmd_init: Starting crmd
Jan 05 19:08:52 na40-58 crmd: [6104]: info:
Hi Dejan,
Actually I don't need CCM ,I tried to write my private CCM just leverage
Heartbeat's messaging channel and heartbeat function.
I want a my private memberhsip management. Is it possible? I think heartbeat
layer supports multiple nodes which means heartbeat can sendclustermsg() to
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:35:26PM +0800, Javen Wu wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Actually I don't need CCM ,I tried to write my private CCM just leverage
Heartbeat's messaging channel and heartbeat function.
I see.
I want a my private memberhsip management. Is it possible?
Definitely.
I think
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Javen Wu wu.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dejan,
Actually I don't need CCM ,I tried to write my private CCM
Ok, I'm officially scared.
What are you trying to achieve here?
just leverage
Heartbeat's messaging channel and heartbeat function.
I want a my private
I have configred heartbeat with each one Virtual IP resource for each node and
configured few lvm partitions for each node as per the requirement.
Tested the failover of IP and lvm partitions, it is working fine.
Now I want to configure NFS Server resource on nodeA and proper mount points -
Kamran Hanif wrote:
Please add the following in both of your nodes before the ping line and then
try again.
respawn hacluster /usr/lib/heartbeat/ipfail
I hope it should work.
this works, if I add a second interface on each node only for ipfail and
one interface connection goes down.
But in
If yes, which options should I use?
Pingd
# cat /etc/ha.d/haresources
node1 IPaddr2::192.168.100.100 drbddisk::r1
Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/drbd::ext3::defaults
Its V1 style.. you should/must consider for V2.
V2 with xml config files is a little bit ugly, but I will try it.
Thank
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 2:21 PM, thomas polnik linux...@polnik.de wrote:
If yes, which options should I use?
Pingd
# cat /etc/ha.d/haresources
node1 IPaddr2::192.168.100.100 drbddisk::r1
Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/drbd::ext3::defaults
Its V1 style.. you should/must consider for V2.
V2
can heartbeat detect a network failure?
Yes
If yes, which options should I use?
Pingd
# cat /etc/ha.d/haresources
node1 IPaddr2::192.168.100.100 drbddisk::r1
Filesystem::/dev/drbd0::/drbd::ext3::defaults
Its V1 style.. you should/must consider for V2.
Regards
Muhammad Sharfuddin
-Original Message-
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of
alex handle
Sent: November 27, 2009 5:39 AM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] Heartbeat + DRBD + NFSv4 automatic failover problem
The error I get in the messages file is.
hb1 apache[18714]: [18782]: ERROR: command failed: sh -c wget -O- -q -L
--bind-address=127.0.0.1 http://*:80 | tr '\012' ' ' | grep -Ei /
*body *[[:space:]]*/ *html * /dev/null
-Original Message-
From: Chris May
Sent: Wednesday, December
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
When one PostgreSQL server fails, the setup will still work fine. When
the failed PostgreSQL instance is back, the data should be first
synchronized from the running PostgreSQL server to a server which was
failed a while ago.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Jason Maur jm...@dawsoncollege.qc.ca wrote:
I have used the exact same setup and i didn't find a solution to the
problem and there was also
a bug with nfsv4 locking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524520 so i switched to
nfsv3
and now the failover
Actually,
The heartbeat API will allow you to get notified when you lose a
single link or it recovers - not just the whole node.
Quoting Dejan Muhamedagic deja...@fastmail.fm:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
When one
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Jason Maur jm...@dawsoncollege.qc.ca wrote:
Not sure if this is a problem per se, but I'm here's my situation:
I have a cluster set up with CentOS + Heartbeat v1 + DRBD + NFSv4. When I
failover from one node to the other (by stopping the heartbeat service on
I have used the exact same setup and i didn't find a solution to the
problem and there was also
a bug with nfsv4 locking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524520 so i switched to
nfsv3
and now the failover time is about 4 seconds :)
Thanks for the reply Alex,
I switched over to
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
When one PostgreSQL server fails, the setup will still work fine. When
the failed PostgreSQL instance is back, the data should be first
synchronized from the running PostgreSQL server to a server which was
failed a while ago.
It is best if such a script could be
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
When one PostgreSQL server fails, the setup will still work fine. When
the failed PostgreSQL instance is back, the data should be first
synchronized from the running PostgreSQL server to a
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
Nov 17 12:43:45 radha heartbeat: [28049]: WARN: No STONITH device
configured.
Do not use it without STONITH. I assume you have STONITH enabled for the cluster
in crm_config but no device configured.
And update to the latest version.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Rolf Schmidt rolf.schm...@novell.comwrote:
Do not use it without STONITH. I assume you have STONITH enabled for the
cluster in crm_config but no device configured.
I don't intentionally have any stonith configured - I don't have any
hardware to enable this. I
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:09:53PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have two nodes, node_1 and node_2.
node_2 was down, but is now up.
How can I execute a custom script on node_1 when it detects that node_2
is back?
That's not possible. What would you want to with that script?
On 11/15/2009 09:09 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have two nodes, node_1 and node_2.
node_2 was down, but is now up.
How can I execute a custom script on node_1 when it detects that node_2
is back?
This is a little off the heartbeat list I guess, but we use Nagios to
monitor our
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:09:53PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have two nodes, node_1 and node_2.
node_2 was down, but is now up.
How can I execute a custom script on node_1 when it detects that node_2
is back?
That's not possible. What would you
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:09:53PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have two nodes, node_1 and node_2.
node_2 was down, but is now up.
How can I execute a custom script on node_1 when it detects that node_2
is back?
That's not
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 02:39:52PM +0100, Dominik Klein wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 09:09:53PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I have two nodes, node_1 and node_2.
node_2 was down, but is now up.
How can I execute
Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2009 16:24:41 schrieb Testuser SST:
Hi,
I´m having some trouble setting up a new clustersystem with drbd.
I´m using a Cent0S 5.4, heartbeat-2.1.3-3.el5.centos and a
drbd83-8.3.2-6.el5_3. This is my config
resources
master_slave id=ms_drbd_mail
Paolo Pisati wrote:
Dear guys,
i've a small problem with an NFS/drbd/heartbeat cluster: basically the
secondary node (that was previously promoted
as primary) when the primary come up again, is unable to release the
resources (ip/drbd) gracefully, and reboots.
I know there's resource
On Oct 21, 2009, at 5:44 AM, Paolo Pisati wrote:
Paolo Pisati wrote:
Dear guys,
i've a small problem with an NFS/drbd/heartbeat cluster: basically
the
secondary node (that was previously promoted
as primary) when the primary come up again, is unable to release the
resources (ip/drbd)
Alex Dean wrote:
This is mentioned in the HaNFS tutorial. See #3 in the 'Hints' section.
http://www.linux-ha.org/HaNFS
thanks, didn't know about that document.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Meir Chanan meir.cha...@gmail.com wrote:
So my question is - Does Linux HA R2-like support such configuration of
mysql master-master (Active-Active) cluster with floating VIP
(Active-Passive) ?
I believe so.
1. How do I configure it ?
Try:
second repeat :-)
It works now.
As you've said, it was a firewall problem, where the UDP ports below
1024 were blocked for all interfaces, so eth2 was also affected.
I've learnt today that ngrep reads the network data before it may be
filtered by iptables.
Best regards
Peter
Lars Ellenberg
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 07:07:16PM +0200, Peter P GMX wrote:
The strange thing is: We can see in the ngrep logs below that both
machines receive communication on upd port 694 .
That was the first I crosschecked, as this is not the first machine we
setup sucessfully.
And if the firewall lets
The strange thing is: We can see in the ngrep logs below that both
machines receive communication on upd port 694 .
That was the first I crosschecked, as this is not the first machine we
setup sucessfully.
And if the firewall lets through the messages on port 694, as we can see
on both macines,
Some more info:
I compared the open ports to another HA inmstalltion which works and
found a difference.
The working HA cluster has another port open for heartbeat:
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
State Benutzer Inode PID/Program name
raw
This kind of problem is nearly /always/ a firewall problem.
People tell me they don't have one. I repeat my advice. This repeats 2
or 3 times and eventually they find the problematic firewall - and
either open port 694 on it, or shut the firewall off. Then the problem
goes away. I cannot count
Am Donnerstag, 24. September 2009 20:14:22 schrieb Peter P GMX:
Hello,
This is the frist heartbeat I setup with heartbeat: version 2.1.3.
Some setups with older versions worked fine.
Do yourself a favor and do not use that old version any more. It's buggy.
However I have a problem with a 2
Hello Michael,
I updated to 2.99-3 (pacemaker-heartbeat package for Ubuntu Hardy) and
still have the same behaviour. FS3 still ignores that FS2 is up and vice
versa.
(Btw: For auth method CRC it complained, that a shared secret is not
valid, so I shouldn't use one).
On each server I can
ping
201 - 300 of 763 matches
Mail list logo
