On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:35:25 +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> In case of a NACK, it's wise to tell our clients
> drivers about how many bytes were actually transferred.
>
> Support this by adding an extra field to the struct
> i2c_msg which gets incremented the amount of bytes
> actually transferred
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:35:25 +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> In case of a NACK, it's wise to tell our clients
> drivers about how many bytes were actually transferred.
>
> Support this by adding an extra field to the struct
> i2c_msg which gets incremented the amount of bytes
> actually transferred
