hello,
On Sun, 03 Jul 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
All patches except #3 merged.
[ cmd640 is not using PCI core - patch #3 rejected ]
Thanks,
Bartlomiej
thanks a lot for your double check.
i already saw the mails today in bk-commits-head :)
--
maks
-
To unsubscribe from this
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
Please pull from:
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/ide-2.6.git
}
Does it fix the idedriver int/dma problem?
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
Please pull from:
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/ide-2.6.git
}
Does it fix the idedriver int/dma problem?
What is the int/dma problem?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
What is the int/dma problem?
}
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT
It feels like DMA is not being applied
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
What is the int/dma problem?
}
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT
It feels like DMA is
Al Boldi wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT
It feels
On 7/4/05, Ondrej Zary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al Boldi wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2%
Al Boldi wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT
The
André Tomt wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT
The hdparm doesn't get as high scores as in
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Phil Dibowitz wrote:
So, there doesn't appear to be a driver for the 20378 in the kernel...
though google showed a few people using some proprietary drivers with
varying luck. Ew.
I noticed there are a lot of other Promise drivers in the kernel for the
same general
12 matches
Mail list logo
