On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 12:21 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
Because not bouncing is a performance optimization and I only did the
work on ide-cd to allow it. Your patch breaks ide-cd on highmem i386
machines, so it's not acceptable.
Tells us more about this crash instead, I'm pretty sure you are
On 8/19/05, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Slagter wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:46 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
After a week of further experience with this patch,
..
I'm now reverting to the original broken patch
..
What is exactly the broken patch and what is this patch?
On 8/19/05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/19/05, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik Slagter wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:46 -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
After a week of further experience with this patch,
..
I'm now reverting to the original broken patch
Brett Russ wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
In such cases, patches are divided into branches by category: ncq (NCQ
queueing support), chs-support (C/H/S support), adma (new ADMA driver),
sil24 (new Silicon Image 312x driver), passthru (ATA passthrough/SMART
support), etc.
Jeff,
The below doesn't
On 08/19/05 01:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
I genearally agree that the events are somewhat standard for block
devices but IMHO SCSI EH also has fair amount SCSI-specific assumptions
and ATA is a bit too different from SCSI to fit cleanly into it. For
example, when handling NCQ errors, the whole
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:11:02PM +0100, Jon Escombe wrote:
Here is a first attempt at a patch to return register data from the
libata passthrough HDIO ioctl handlers, I needed this as the ATA
'unload immediate' command returns the success in the lbal register.
Haven't had any feedback
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:06:27PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 11:11:02PM +0100, Jon Escombe wrote:
Here is a first attempt at a patch to return register data from the
libata passthrough HDIO ioctl handlers, I needed this as the ATA
'unload immediate' command
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:46:35PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
Using the command time out hook and the strategy routine, gives _complete_
control over host recovery, and I really do mean _complete_.
I assume you mean hostt-eh_timed_out.
Is anyone implmenting (or has implemented) a
Luben Tuikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/19/05 15:38, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
The eh_timed_out + eh_strategy_handler is actually pretty perfect,
and _complete_, for any application and purpose in recovering a
LU/device/host (in that order ;-) ).
The two problems I see with the hook
On 08/19/05 16:11, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 04:03:15PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
The eh_timed_out + eh_strategy_handler is actually pretty perfect,
and _complete_, for any application and purpose in recovering a
One other point: Another problems is that we quiesce
On 08/19/05 17:10, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
Luben -
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 04:43:41PM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote:
On 08/19/05 16:11, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
I was changing it to wakeup the eh even while other IO is outstanding, so
the eh can wakeup and cancel individual commands while
On 8/19/05, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Gwe, 2005-08-19 at 11:02 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/27/20
AFAIK CS5535 driver was never ported to 2.6.x. Somebody needs to
port it to 2.6.x kernel, cleanup to match kernel coding standards and test.
12 matches
Mail list logo
