There are configurations where CONFIG_ACPI but !CONFIG_PM. In this
case, pata_acpi can be selected but won't build. Fix it.
Reported by Avuton Olrich.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Avuton Olrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2
Hello,
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 10:31:17 AM, you wrote:
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
I'm thinking of replacing both 3512 controllers with a Promise SATA300
TX4. Do you know if there are problems with this device?
(please don't top-post)
There are no known data-corruption issues with
Hi
On my system (2.6.23-rc9) I have Serial-ATA DVD/RW drive connected
to sata_sil controller. Sometimes when there is a problem with CD
or DVD disk controller shutdowns drive:
[53560.095573] cdrom: sr0: mrw address space DMA selected
[53561.001946] ISO 9660 Extensions: Microsoft Joliet Level 3
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:38:04 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
On my system (2.6.23-rc9) I have Serial-ATA DVD/RW drive connected
to sata_sil controller. Sometimes when there is a problem with CD
or DVD disk controller shutdowns drive:
[53560.095573] cdrom: sr0: mrw address space DMA
I tried switching one machine here from old IDE
modules to a new pata subsystem today. And it
failed, for the first time I ever tried this
procedure. Pata_via refuses to recognize one
of the drives.
Here's the dmesg with via82cxxx (2.6.20):
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision:
Hello Alexander,
Wednesday, October 17, 2007, 2:54:25 PM, you wrote:
Log file got lost. Please post relevant parts inline.
Sorry, i totally forgot to include them.
I can not reproduce the errors. Last times hda did not give errors. So i'm
not sure if it is related to each other. (in the thread
And one more issue with my attempt to switch
from via82cxxx to pata_via.
I noticied that on all machines I tried to convert,
CD-Rom devices are recognized as hard disks.
With via82cxxx and ide-cd, it was like
hdc: IDE cdrom model=FX4830T s/n=4JV6F7Q4 fw=8.01 udma5
But with pata_via and 2.6.23,
Oct 17 18:30:59 linux kernel: ata2: port is slow to respond, please be
patient (Status 0x80)
Oct 17 18:30:59 linux kernel: ata2: SRST failed (errno=-16)
So it failed to reset and come back to sanity.
Oct 17 18:30:59 linux kernel: ata2.01: ATAPI: FX4830T, R02E, max UDMA/33
Oct 17 18:30:59
I have a Dell Inspiron 9400 with an external ExpressCard slot.
I've also got a Bytecc 2-port eSATA ExpressCard-34 that identifies as:
Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3132 Serial ATA Raid II Controller (rev 01)
To get it to work with Linux on my Dell notebook,
the pcihp_force=1 parameter is necessary
Hello Tejun,
I've CC'd the mailing list, but couldn't find Torsten's e-mail. Do you
have any suggestions on where I should look for this problem? Did the
boot-up log suggest anything to you?
- Clarence
-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:35:52 +0400
Michael Tokarev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And one more issue with my attempt to switch
from via82cxxx to pata_via.
I noticied that on all machines I tried to convert,
CD-Rom devices are recognized as hard disks.
Thats deeply weird.
But with pata_via and
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
* Don't set write-only ide_task_t.hobRegister[6] and ide_task_t.hobRegister[7]
in idedisk_set_max_address_ext().
* Add struct ide_taskfile and use it in ide_task_t instead of tfRegister[]
and hobRegister[].
* Remove no longer needed
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Remove task_ioreg_t typedef from the kernel code (but leave it
in linux/hdreg.h for #ifndef/#endif __KERNEL__ case).
While at it also move sata_ioreg_t typedef under #ifndef/#endif __KERNEL__.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alan Cox wrote:
Oct 17 18:30:59 linux kernel: ata2: port is slow to respond, please be
patient (Status 0x80)
Oct 17 18:30:59 linux kernel: ata2: SRST failed (errno=-16)
So it failed to reset and come back to sanity.
Oct 17 18:30:59 linux kernel: ata2.01: ATAPI: FX4830T, R02E, max UDMA/33
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 00:14:26 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Martin, could you run git-bisect (http://kerneltrap.org/node/11753 - sorry
for not explaining the procudure myself but Linus did it really well)
starting with:
git bisect good
Hi,
MisterE wrote:
Tonight i will try the Asus motherboard with 1 drive and much I/O. And
i will create a new array which takes 7 hours. But how often/hours do
you need to try something to prove it does not fail :P
On one box I had problems with the SATA300 TX4 using 2.6.21 through
2.6.22
BZ == Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BZ We probably need also this one for pata_cs5536:
BZ [PATCH] pata_cs5536: MWDMA fix
BZ * Fix out-of-bound array access for MWDMA modes.
BZ * Bump driver version.
Obviously correct.
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Several threads that suggest this message is related to poor NCQ
support, but I did not see any for this drive. It's a Western Digital
WD1500ADFD-00NLR1. Is this the same thing, and should this drive be
blacklisted?
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x1f1 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00:
This looks like both drives end up trying to be the slave ? Its certainly
very vey confused at this point. Interesting it works with the BIOS doing
the reset, wonder what the difference is.
Not only it works with BIOS, it also works with via82cxxx just fine.
The via82cxxx driver doesn't
Hello.
Martin Rogge wrote:
Martin, could you run git-bisect (http://kerneltrap.org/node/11753 - sorry
for not explaining the procudure myself but Linus did it really well)
starting with:
git bisect good 688a87d145e04f6761c63e7f2e19fd9b3e4ca060
git bisect bad
Apologies to those who sent me email in the past 12 hours -- there was a
mail loop apparently. Should be fixed now, but anything you sent has
likely been lost.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enable enclosure management via LED
As described in the AHCI spec, some AHCI controllers may support
Enclosure management via a variety of protocols. This patch
adds support for the LED message type that is specified in
AHCI 1.1 and higher.
Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi [EMAIL
At least 2 drivers (siimage and cs5535) have a bug where they use
the construct:
ide_drive_t *pair = hwif-drives[drive-dn ^ 1];
To access the other drive in a master/slave pair. This is bogus
because drive-dn is not the unit number, but the global drive
number, thus can be 2 3 for
The siimage use an incorrect construct to access the other drive
of a pair, causing it to access beyond an array boundary on non-0
interfaces. This fixes it by using the new ide_get_paired_drive()
hepler instead.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The cs5535 use an incorrect construct to access the other drive
of a pair, causing it to access beyond an array boundary on non-0
interfaces. This fixes it by using the new ide_get_paired_drive()
hepler instead.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Tejun Heo wrote:
There are configurations where CONFIG_ACPI but !CONFIG_PM. In this
case, pata_acpi can be selected but won't build. Fix it.
Reported by Avuton Olrich.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Avuton Olrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c |2 ++
1
Li Yang wrote:
This patch adds support for Freescale 3.0Gbps SATA Controller supporting
Native Command Queueing(NCQ), device hotplug, and ATAPI. This controller
can be found on MPC8315 and MPC8378.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Li Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Alan Cox wrote:
ata_check_status() does an SFF compliant check
ata_chk_status() does a generic call to ap-ops-check_status (usually
ata_check_status)
libata-sff uses the wrong one. Hardly suprising given the naming here,
which ought to get fixed to ata_sff_check_status() perhaps ?
Sonic Zhang wrote:
Changes:
1. Remove irq_ack() and port_disable() methods
2. Acocomodate for the libata-link patches
3. Change Kconfig ATAPI mode option into a module param.
4. Add supported WMDMA mode.
Signed-off-by: Sonic Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Well, the new driver is not a fix.
Anyway -- still plugging away at debugging libata. It seems some
outside changes are causing a bunch of my test boxes to crap themselves.
These need to go up in the meantime, however.
Maybe its the sg-chaining stuff, we'll see. I'm watching that thread
(cc-ing linux-ide)
Mathieu Fluhr wrote:
Hello all,
First of all, let me introduce myself a little bit. I am the responsable
for the development of the Nero Linux burning application. So I have
access to all the source code of the application.
Now let's go with the story: It seems that there
Tejun Heo wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Some commands need post-processing after successful completion. This
was done in ata_scsi_qc_complete() till now but command post
processing doesn't belong to SAT layer. Move them to
__ata_qc_complete() and, while at it, restructure a bit
Robert Hancock wrote:
This doesn't seem a very reliable way to identify an IDE device, as all
that 0 means is that the device does not claim conformance to any
standard. I would think it would be legitimate for an IDE device to put
a value like 5 in there as well, if it complies with SPC-4..
SCR read for controllers which uses PCI configuration space for SCR
access got broken while adding @val argument to SCR accessors. Fix
it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/ata/sata_sis.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
MisterE wrote:
Oct 13 13:01:26 fileserver kernel: ata4.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr
0x240 action 0x0
Oct 13 13:01:26 fileserver kernel: ata4.00: (BMDMA2 stat 0x650001)
Oct 13 13:01:26 fileserver kernel: ata4.00: cmd
ca/00:f8:47:e1:5e/00:00:00:00:00/e4 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 126976
Hello, all.
Torsten, Clarence is reporting similar problem on 2.6.22. The original
message follows.
I'm using the 2.6.22 sources with a Sii3132 SATA controller and a Seagate HDD.
What I've noticed is that it often fails to boot with this configuration.
Warm boots appear to always fail while
BTW, while doing the TEST UNIT READY emulation patch for ATA (recently
withdrawn from libata-dev.git#upstream), I found a problem with the
interface that was difficult to get around: TEST UNIT READY simulation
code really wants to look at the result TF of CHECK POWER MODE, even if
ATA_ERR is
Dear all,
I just now realize that all disk i.o. on my machine is quite slow
compared with the pata disks I had before. Furthermore I recognized that
I only have seagates (ST3400832AS,ST3400620AS,ST3750640AS,ST3750640AS)
connected to a sil3114 controller.
Being on kernel 2.6.23.1 and stumbling
38 matches
Mail list logo
