On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Kamalesh Babulal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for pointing the patch, I do not have the SES config option enabled,
then too i tried your patch, but that does not solve the panic. The kernel
panic's with the same panic message as before. I have attached
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 3:15 AM, Kamalesh Babulal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for pointing the patch, I do not have the SES config option enabled,
then too i tried your patch, but that does not solve the
Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Kamalesh Babulal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Nish Aravamudan wrote:
On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 February
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Kamalesh Babulal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Nish Aravamudan
Hi,
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Nish Aravamudan wrote:
On 2/7/08,
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 14 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 11
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 13:07 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I worry that another git-bisect session will be needed unless SCSI
developers are already aware of the problem source.
Yinghai Lu noticed that it may be actually a SES problem:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/88
[ I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9962
Summary: 2.6.26-git0: IDE oops during boot
Product: IO/Storage
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-git0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Nish Aravamudan wrote:
On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9962
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-13 15:02 ---
As stated above, the Bugzilla entry is for tracking the regression. If you
think it should be reassigned, please let me know and I'll do that.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9962
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-13 14:38 ---
What makes you think that it is actually an IDE problem? The initial problem
(which Andi fixed) was with *ide_generic* oopsing and could be just
work-arounded by disabling
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9962
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-13 15:58 ---
Yes, it should be reassigned to under investigation department.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9962
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-13 16:09 ---
Also the bug summary is totally wrong now since IDE OOPS has been already
fixed,
the problem now is:
Creating root device.
Mounting root filesystem.
mount: could not find
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Nish Aravamudan wrote:
On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 06
On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Trying to boot
Nish Aravamudan wrote:
On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Trying to
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Trying to boot 2.6.25-git0 (few days old), I get
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ..ffb0
IP at init_irq+0x42e
init_irq? hmm...
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Trying to boot 2.6.25-git0 (few days old), I get
BUG: unable to handle kernel
On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Trying to boot 2.6.25-git0 (few days old), I get
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ..ffb0
IP at init_irq+0x42e
Call trace:
ide_device_add_all
ide_generic_init
kernel_init
child_rip
vgacon_cursor
kernel_init
Hi,
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Trying to boot 2.6.25-git0 (few days old), I get
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ..ffb0
IP at init_irq+0x42e
init_irq? hmm...
Call trace:
21 matches
Mail list logo