Gaston, Jason D wrote:
What is the difference between NA and RV? If the controller only has
access to 2 ports, does it matter which I set the nonexistent port
values to in the map?
NA is used for unimplemented ports of a valid configuration while RV is
used to mark invalid MAP value. So, NA
What is the difference between NA and RV? If the controller only has
access to 2 ports, does it matter which I set the nonexistent port
values to in the map?
NA is used for unimplemented ports of a valid configuration while RV is
used to mark invalid MAP value. So, NA should be mixed with
-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:08 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ICH9 2 port SATA controller port map?
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
Hello,
ICH9 has DeviceID's for 2 port, IDE mode, SATA
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:08 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ICH9 2 port SATA controller port map?
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
Hello,
ICH9 has DeviceID's
Hello,
ICH9 has DeviceID's for 2 port, IDE mode, SATA controllers. The current
port map in ata_piix is setup for the 4 port controllers. This seems to
work ok, but I wonder if a new port map should be defined for the 2 port
controllers, where the two ports are PM, SM? You can refer to the ICH9
