CompactFlash cards in a passive PCMCIA adapter don't seem
to like the ATA_CMD_SET_FEATURES command, which causes
libata device probing to fail.
Since PCMCIA only allows PIO mode 0 anyway, there is no
point in ever setting a higher speed. Adding the dummy
function seems to do the right thing.
the hdreg.h exports some SIZE defines to userspace but it utilizes sizeof(u8)
in its definition ... that's no good so the trivial attached patch changes
that to sizeof(__u8)
-mike
pgpMboRpdpWGM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Use __u8 rather than u8 in SIZE defines exported to userspace.
Fix PIO mode 1 overclocked taskfile transfers -- probably a typo carried over
from drivers/ide/pci/siimage.c where I've found it by documentation check...
drivers/ata/pata_sil680.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ata/pata_sil680.c
Hello.
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Fix PIO mode 1 overclocked taskfile transfers -- probably a typo carried over
from drivers/ide/pci/siimage.c where I've found it by documentation check...
drivers/ata/pata_sil680.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index:
Fix PIO mode 1 overclocked taskfile transfers -- probably a typo carried over
from drivers/ide/pci/siimage.c where I've found it by documentation check...
drivers/ata/pata_sil680.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
I looked into fixing this but had a feeling that the thing wasn't right
from the very start, including ata_pio_need_iordy(). In my understanding of
the ANSI T13 stadrads, when one issues Set Features subcommand Set Transfer
Mode with sector count register of 0x8 thru 0xC this means
Hello.
Alan wrote:
I looked into fixing this but had a feeling that the thing wasn't right
from the very start, including ata_pio_need_iordy(). In my understanding of
the ANSI T13 stadrads, when one issues Set Features subcommand Set Transfer
Mode with sector count register of 0x8 thru
(please CC, not on the list)
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 05:51:22AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Allessandro Zummo sent the patch below to me a while ago, for support
for the PATA controller (PIO only, although the hardware can also do
UDMA) in the cirrus logic ep93xx ARM cpu.
The driver has
Fix two typos found by SiI680A documentation check. They caused the taskfile
transfer overclocking:
- in PIO mode 1 as 0x2283 must be used for both data and taskfile transfers;
- in PIO mode 2 as data and taskfile timings are swapped when writing to the
MMIO regs.
Fix coding style and
Hello, I wrote:
Fix two typos found by SiI680A documentation check. They caused the taskfile
transfer overclocking:
- in PIO mode 1 as 0x2283 must be used for both data and taskfile transfers;
- in PIO mode 2 as data and taskfile timings are swapped when writing to the
MMIO regs.
Fix
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 14:33:44 +0100
Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: problems with CD burning
References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg06545.html
Submitter : Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : unknown
...
Hi everybody,
the problem I already
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:47:18PM +0100, Patrick Ale wrote:
Hi,
Hi Patrick,
With kernel 2.6.19 I was able to boot using the pata_via driver
I tried to compile 2.6.20-rc6 and now I get a unknown device: sda3
error when I try to boot.
I compiled 2.6.20-rc6 by copying over the .config from
Patch is against 2.6.20-rc6-mm1, though will also apply to 2.6.20-rc6 if
sata_nv-cleanup-adma-error-handling-v2.patch and
sata_nv-cleanup-adma-error-handling-v2-cleanup.patch from -mm are
applied first. Testing from those who experienced the previous cache
flush timeout problem, in particular,
Applies to 2.6.20-rc6.
---
libata's SCSI translation for the SCSI START STOP UNIT command with the
START bit clear (i.e. stopping the drive) appears to be incorrect. It
sends an ATA STANDBY command with the time period set to 0, which the
code comment says means now, but the ATA standard
Here's a patch for sd.c I've cooked up which issues a START STOP UNIT
command to stop the drive when the SCSI disk is removed or the machine
is powered down. The rationale behind this is that apparently on many
drives, simply cutting power to the spinning disk forces it to do an
emergency head
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 14:33 +0100, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:42:30 +0100
Von: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)
[ Added Jeff, Jens and Mike Christie to Cc. I would _guess_ this is
associated with the larger block pc request stuff: Mike, Jens? James B
added for good luck.
It apparently started happening somewhere between 2.6.19 and 2.6.20-rc2,
and doing a
gitk v2.6.19..v2.6.20-rc2
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 23:04 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Can somebody try to bisect this?
I'm bisecting the old fashioned way right now. I'll get it to at least a
specific rc, and maybe further.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of
Tejun Heo wrote:
Andrew Paprocki wrote:
On 10/30/06, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please read the following thread.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/13222/focus=13235
Worked like a charm! Just patched up smartmontools now and I don't get
the failed cmds anymore. Hope Bruce
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:26:03 +0100
Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I just tried it with 2.6.20-rc6, and can confirm. Once nero is
run, the kernel never gives up retrying whatever command failed, so I
get...
[ 4362.972995] hdd: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 22:48 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 07:26:03 +0100
Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I just tried it with 2.6.20-rc6, and can confirm. Once nero is
run, the kernel never gives up retrying whatever command failed, so I
get...
[
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Unfortunately, I'm git impaired. I am rummaging as we speak though.
Ok, I'm personally heading to bed, but it rally should be as simple as
- get the git tree in the first place
- do
git bisect good v2.6.19
git bisect bad
22 matches
Mail list logo
