Hi Tejun,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:55:22 +0900
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rolland wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:56:59 +0930
David Newall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Rolland (???) wrote:
Hell, IRQ 23 is shared between libata and my modem !!!
hi,
i saw the below changes from
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git;a=commi
tdiff;h=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817
[libata] sata_nv: Clean up ATA_FLAG_NCQ usage; bit test micro-opt
@@ -622,7 +622,9 @@ static const struct ata_port_info nv_port_info[] =
{
Kuan Luo wrote:
hi,
i saw the below changes from
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git;a=commi
tdiff;h=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817
[libata] sata_nv: Clean up ATA_FLAG_NCQ usage; bit test micro-opt
@@ -622,7 +622,9 @@ static const struct ata_port_info
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
hi,
i saw the below changes from
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.g
it;a=commi
tdiff;h=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817
[libata] sata_nv: Clean up ATA_FLAG_NCQ usage; bit test micro-opt
@@ -622,7 +622,9
Kuan Luo wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
hi,
i saw the below changes from
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.g
it;a=commi
tdiff;h=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817
[libata] sata_nv: Clean up ATA_FLAG_NCQ usage; bit test micro-opt
@@ -622,7
Saw that popping up in my log today on a brand new T61 thinkpad:
[ 427.712000] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x18 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
[ 427.712000] ata1.00: (spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0 SAct=0x18
FIS=004040a1:0024)
[ 427.712000] ata1.00: cmd
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
hi,
i saw the below changes from
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.g
it;a=commi
tdiff;h=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817
[libata] sata_nv: Clean up ATA_FLAG_NCQ usage;
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Kuan Luo wrote:
hi,
i saw the below changes from
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.g
it;a=commi
tdiff;h=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817
[libata] sata_nv: Clean up ATA_FLAG_NCQ usage;
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:39:54AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
[cc'ing Henrique and Jeff]
Robert wrote:
Hello,
When shutting down this system running Linux 2.6.22.6, I get a warning about
the possibility that the disks are not properly shut down. When the power is
turned off, it sounds
Let me guess... this is a T61 or X61 ?
There's a problem with these that we don't fully understand yet, we're
getting those stale interrupts all over the range.
I wonder if it could be a bug with the ICH8 chipset...
If yours is one of these, it's being dealt with (or attempted to deal
with) at
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SB700 supports one physical IDE channel, but SB700 SATA controller
supports combined mode. When the SATA combined mode is enabled,
two SATA ports(port4 and port5) share one IDE channel from IDE
controller, and PATA will share the other IDE channel.
Our previous patch
Hello,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:04:11 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me guess... this is a T61 or X61 ?
Bad luck ;)
This is an Asus P5W-DH Deluxe motherboard, with a Core2 6400 CPU,
a bunch of disk (2 IDE, 3 SATA, 1 CDRW and 1 DVDRW-DL), and a damned
Olitec PCI V92
Hello.
Shane Huang wrote:
SB700 supports one physical IDE channel, but SB700 SATA controller
supports combined mode. When the SATA combined mode is enabled,
two SATA ports(port4 and port5) share one IDE channel from IDE
controller, and PATA will share the other IDE channel.
Our previous
Hello,
First off, i'm quite new to linux. I don't know the official way's to
report bugs. I'm not even sure that the bug is sata driver related. I
hope you can do some suggestions.
I recently bought 2 Sweex Sata controllers (without raid). This device
contains the Sil3512 chip.
I connected it to
'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
index 4d175c7..a87bc58 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
'noacpi' isn't a standalone parameter, give it its prefix.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
index 4d175c7..a87bc58 100644
---
if you're going to add that libata-related parm to the kernel parms
file, wouldn't it make sense for consistency to add the other
available boot-time parms from libata-core.c as well? it seems
counter-productive to document only a subset of them from the same
source file.
He's not adding it
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:14:36 +0100
Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modern laptops with hotswap bays still tend to utilise a PATA interface
on a SATA bridge, generally with the host controller in some legacy
emulation mode rather than AHCI. This means that the existing hotplug
code
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:26:59AM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
1. How does it handle things when you have a bay that is located behind
a dock and the dock ejects? In the acpi bay driver, I use the mechanism
that the dock driver exports to get undock notifications so that the bay
Michal Suchanek wrote:
Hello
(please CC me when replying)
On 11/09/2007, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michal Suchanek wrote:
What does 'smartctl -a /dev/sda' say?
Attaching output.
Hmmm... How often does the condition occur? smartlog records only two
occasions.
Every few
Bruce Allen wrote:
Andrew: thanks for isolating this problem.
Tejun: any thoughts? The STRANGE_BUFFER_LENGTH problem is fixed in the
code that Andrew is running. The problem is provoked with '-o on' which
goes via a TASKFILE ioctl.
I suppose you mean HDIO_DRIVE_TASK, right? libata
I think there have been enough cases where this draining was necessary.
IIRC, ata_piix was involved in those cases, right? If so, can you
please submit a patch which applies this only to affected controllers?
I don't feel too confident about applying this to all SFF controllers.
Old IDE
After applying the patches you sent, I had not received any additional
errors until today. Below is an output from dmesg.
Thanks for your help,
Jon
ata1.15: exception Emask 0x100 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
ata1.15: irq_stat 0x00020002, PMP DMA CS errata
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x100
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
The spec seems to imply that even if the drive hotswap bay and the
battery bay are physically the same, they're logically distinct. 10.2.1
That holds true for thinkpads up to the T43, at least. I don't know about
the newer ones.
You get bay
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 10:05 +, Paul Rolland wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:04:11 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me guess... this is a T61 or X61 ?
Bad luck ;)
This is an Asus P5W-DH Deluxe motherboard, with a Core2 6400 CPU,
a bunch of disk (2
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Saw that popping up in my log today on a brand new T61 thinkpad:
[ 427.712000] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x18 SErr 0x0 action 0x2
frozen
[ 427.712000] ata1.00: (spurious completions during NCQ issue=0x0 SAct=0x18
FIS=004040a1:0024)
[
Alan Cox wrote:
I think there have been enough cases where this draining was necessary.
IIRC, ata_piix was involved in those cases, right? If so, can you
please submit a patch which applies this only to affected controllers?
I don't feel too confident about applying this to all SFF
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 13:35 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Saw that popping up in my log today on a brand new T61 thinkpad:
[ 427.712000] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x2 SAct 0x18 SErr 0x0 action 0x2
frozen
[ 427.712000] ata1.00: (spurious completions during NCQ
Tejun Heo wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I think there have been enough cases where this draining was necessary.
IIRC, ata_piix was involved in those cases, right? If so, can you
please submit a patch which applies this only to affected controllers?
I don't feel too confident about applying this to
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Allright. What is happening exactly ? A fluke on the link ?
The drive is sending spurious completions of NCQ commands (ie. it's
sending completions for commands which are not pending). We believe
this happens due to firmware bugs and it matched the reality pretty
Tejun Heo wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I think there have been enough cases where this draining was necessary.
IIRC, ata_piix was involved in those cases, right? If so, can you
please submit a patch which applies this only to affected controllers?
I don't feel
Hi Sergei:
Thanks for your reply.
The inlined patch has suffered from word wrapping,
OK, I think the cause is my mail client MS outlook's setting.
I try to change my outlook settings and attach the patch again at the
end of this mail. Please check it again.
and the attached one
luckily
Hi Tejun,
Thanks! Yes I meant HDIO_DRIVE_TASK. Please let me know what your tests
reveal.
Cheers,
Bruce
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
Bruce Allen wrote:
Andrew: thanks for isolating this problem.
Tejun: any thoughts? The STRANGE_BUFFER_LENGTH problem is fixed in the
Tejun Heo wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I think there have been enough cases where this draining was necessary.
IIRC, ata_piix was involved in those cases, right? If so, can you
please submit a patch which applies this only to affected controllers?
I don't feel too confident about applying this to
34 matches
Mail list logo
