-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:14 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] ata_piix: IDE mode SATA patch for Intel
ICH10
DeviceID's
Jason Gaston
Gaston, for the initial detection failure messages when connected to
ICH
AHCI, I don't really have much idea what's going on or how to fix it.
I
suspect it's related to initial FISes from drives arriving
asynchronously after hard resets but can't tell much without bus
analyzer. Anyways, as EH can
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tejun Heo
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:19 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: Andrew Ryder; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sata 4726 Testing
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
Attached are two dmesg
-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:34 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: Tom Evans; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA PMP support in 2.6.24-rc3?
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
For reference, here is the dmesg output from the 2.6.24
-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:28 AM
To: Tom Evans
Cc: Gaston, Jason D; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SATA PMP support in 2.6.24-rc3?
Tom Evans wrote:
I'm also seeing this with 2.6.23-rc3 on my Alpha system
-Original Message-
From: Gaston, Jason D
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:21 PM
To: 'Tejun Heo'; Tom Evans
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: SATA PMP support in 2.6.24-rc3?
-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 4:28
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
Does 2.6.24-rc3 support SATA port multipliers?
I am getting ata6.03: COMRESET failed (errno=-5) error messages
with a
SiliconImage PMP connected to an Intel ICH9 SATA controller in AHCI
mode.
Yeah, it should work.
Dmesg output attached.
Eeek.. Can you please tell me
Does 2.6.24-rc3 support SATA port multipliers?
I am getting ata6.03: COMRESET failed (errno=-5) error messages with a
SiliconImage PMP connected to an Intel ICH9 SATA controller in AHCI
mode.
Dmesg output attached.
Thanks,
Jason
Linux version 2.6.24-rc3 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tejun Heo
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:07 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: Alan Cox; linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATAPI devices in AHCI mode not working
Gaston, Jason D wrote
Yeah, there has been quite some update in libata between SLES10_SP1
and
2.6.24-rc1. The controller being ahci, I wonder whether this is
caused
by the different in check_atapi_dma().
1. Does other optical drives have the same problem? If not, please
post
the result of hdparm -I /dev/sr0 with the
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:30 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATAPI devices in AHCI mode not working
ata1.00: ATAPI: TSSTcorpCD/DVDW SH-S183L, SB01, max UDMA/33, ATAPI AN
Everyones
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:14 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATAPI devices in AHCI mode not working
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar [EMAIL PROTECTED] port 0xd9101100 irq 216
ata2: SATA max
this was full of spaces, and should be converted to tabs (I did this
manually)
In the future, make sure to run your patch through
scripts/checkpatch.pl. Some of that script's complaints are a bit
insane, but most are good.
static const struct piix_map_db *piix_map_db_table[] = {
What is the difference between NA and RV? If the controller only has
access to 2 ports, does it matter which I set the nonexistent port
values to in the map?
NA is used for unimplemented ports of a valid configuration while RV is
used to mark invalid MAP value. So, NA should be mixed with
-Original Message-
From: Tejun Heo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 6:08 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ICH9 2 port SATA controller port map?
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
Hello,
ICH9 has DeviceID's for 2 port, IDE mode, SATA
Hello,
ICH9 has DeviceID's for 2 port, IDE mode, SATA controllers. The current
port map in ata_piix is setup for the 4 port controllers. This seems to
work ok, but I wonder if a new port map should be defined for the 2 port
controllers, where the two ports are PM, SM? You can refer to the ICH9
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 3:39 PM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch
for
Intel Tolapai
Gaston, Jason D wrote
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 12:51 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][reRESEND] ata_piix: IDE mode SATA patch
for
Intel Tolapai
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Gaston, Jason D
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4][RESEND] ahci: RAID mode SATA patch for Intel
Tolapai
Resend without wordwrap.
This patch
Hello,
Now that the AHCI driver has support for all controllers with the 0x0106
(AHCI) class code, I am not planning on adding controller DeviceID's for
AHCI controllers. I want to verify that this is the correct course of
action.
Note: I still will have to add the Intel SW RAID controller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 1:30 PM
To: Thorsten Leemhuis
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis; Chuck Ebbert; Jeff Garzik; IDE/ATA
development list; Gaston, Jason D; Alan Cox;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
FYI: DID 2850 is the PATA IDE controller. Most likely, the laptop does not
have SATA drives and is running off of PATA.
The old IDE subsystem (piix.c) is where I added that PATA DID to.
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_6 0x2850 in pci_ids.h
Jason
-Original Message-
From:
I don't think we want to have a PATA controller DID added to the SATA IDE mode
driver. This DID is already in the PATA piix.c driver.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chr
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:20 AM
To:
DID 2850 is not a SATA controller. This is an ICH8 PATA controller DID.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michal Piotrowski
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 2:36 PM
To: Maurizio Monge
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:50 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide
Hello,
When I hot-remove a SATA HD in AHCI mode and then hot-plug the drive
back in again, the /dev/sdX number changes to the next available number.
Is this going to be a problem when using a RAID array that includes that
drive?
Thanks,
Jason
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Yes, I sent an updated patch that uses the ICH8 structures.
Do you need me to send this again.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 12:41 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
