On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:32:29 +0100, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:37:10 +0100, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03 2005, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:54:48 +0900,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:54:48 +0900, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
11_ide_drive_sleeping_fix.patch
ide_drive_t.sleeping field added. 0 in sleep field used to
indicate inactive sleeping but because 0 is a valid jiffy
value, though slim, there's a chance that
11_ide_drive_sleeping_fix.patch
ide_drive_t.sleeping field added. 0 in sleep field used to
indicate inactive sleeping but because 0 is a valid jiffy
value, though slim, there's a chance that something can go
weird. And while at it, explicit jiffy comparisons are
