On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:20:06 +0200
Chr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a new laptop and I had a little problem that the DVD drive wasn't
recognized by
libata's piix driver (but the old IDE Subsystem found it!).
So, after adding the new pciid 8086:2850 it works!
But, I don't know if
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:20:06 +0200
Chr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I got a new laptop and I had a little problem that the DVD drive wasn't
recognized by
libata's piix driver (but the old IDE Subsystem found it!).
So, after adding the
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chr
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:53 AM
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:20:06 +0200
Chr [EMAIL
I don't think we want to have a PATA controller DID added to the SATA IDE mode
driver. This DID is already in the PATA piix.c driver.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-ide-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chr
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 6:20 AM
To:
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
FYI: DID 2850 is the PATA IDE controller. Most likely, the laptop does not
have SATA drives and is running off of PATA.
The old IDE subsystem (piix.c) is where I added that PATA DID to.
#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ICH8_60x2850 in
@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
FYI: DID 2850 is the PATA IDE controller. Most likely, the laptop does
not have SATA drives and is running off of PATA.
The old IDE subsystem (piix.c) is where I added that PATA DID
,
Chr.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 11:50 AM
To: Gaston, Jason D
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata: ATA_PIIX missing ICH8M PCIIDs.
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
FYI
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at
that point.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Gaston, Jason D wrote:
I hate outlook...
As PATA is going away, hopefully this will be a moot point.
yes, PATA served well, but Intel has already done the necessary
ceremony for PATA's funreal. ICH8M is maybe really the last
chipset with a native IDE interface.
On Monday, 18. June 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Gaston, Jason D wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
In Fedora 7, CONFIG_IDE is disabled. ata_piix drives all hardware at
that point.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:00:33 -0700
Gaston, Jason D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we want to have a PATA controller DID added to the SATA IDE
mode driver.
ata_piix drives both
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-ide in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:57:16 -0700
Gaston, Jason D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we want to have the same DeviceID supported in more then one
driver. Would they not conflict with each other?
Nope and drivers/ide is going away (eventually)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
12 matches
Mail list logo
