Hi!
A company, supported by a VC, is looking for
*** Brilliant programmers
For a very ambitious and interesting project!
If you dealing with the Kernel real time programming
expert in C/C++/Assembler please connect my e-mail.
Thank you.
Hi!
A company, supported by a VC, is looking for
*** Brilliant programmers
For a very ambitious and interesting project!
If you dealing with the Kernel real time programming
expert in C/C++/Assembler please connect my e-mail.
Thank you.
Actually,
my HP 3100 is _so_ proprietry,
that my _windows_ ghostview has
to use the generic mswinpr2 protocol.
Does this mean that it is compatible
with anything more generic in linux?
Thanks
(I hope you are not fed up with this
topic already)
Dorit
dorit ben shalom wrote:
Actually,
my HP 3100 is _so_ proprietry,
that my _windows_ ghostview has
to use the generic mswinpr2 protocol.
Does this mean that it is compatible
with anything more generic in linux?
Well, that's pretty logical. Windows and Unix Ghostscript mostly use the
same
dorit ben shalom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, I need a doc reader.
AFAIK, applix does not read Word7 docs (not sure though). Actually, I
believe we have both, but I have not used either for a long time. You
guys will laugh, but on the rare occasions when I need to read a doc
file
i was wondering, before i spend several hours downloading and cinfiguring
wine, whether it can run hebrew versions of windows programs?
i tried it at the time with win 3.11 (I currently, hopefully not long run
a 486) and got a message that it was the wrong version of windows.
Also, does anyone
I know that staroffice doesn't support hebrew yet, but does anyone know if
it will load english documents writen with the hebrew version of word?
(I don't have word so I can't check it myself)
thanx
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
To
Micha Feigin wrote:
i was wondering, before i spend several hours downloading and cinfiguring
wine, whether it can run hebrew versions of windows programs?
i tried it at the time with win 3.11 (I currently, hopefully not long run
a 486) and got a message that it was the wrong version of
I wonder what is the figure for Linux if I would take into account the Xwindows
interface and/or various libraries that meant to hide it. And what about the various
window managers ?
This figure is misleading anyway. Pure Unix has 5 system calls - open(),
read(), write(), close() and
Actually, it's more of a philosophical question; the MAPS RBL only
lists IP addresses which are associated with `hard' network abusers,
e.g. bulk friendly ISPs, etc. So sites choosing to block traffic (or
SMTP) from IP addresses listed on the RBL know fairly well that they
won't lose
Adam Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not necessarily true -- bulk friendly ISPs can also have legitimate
customers.
I think you're wrong there.
In spam-fighter lingo, a ``bulk friendly ISP'' is an ISP willing to
tolerate its users sending unsolicited bulk email, which is one of
Recentli, I've finished the first working version
of my socks4/5 proxy/firewall for windows NT. Since the NT was in the
definition of the project, I couldn't do it other way :( although I did
want to. Now, when everything is working, and my grade is almost ready, I
want to port it to unix as
that isn't what always happens. Theoretically, users of the DUL accept
the fact that they won't receive email from dynamic IP addresses. But,
as we've just seen, not all dynamic IP users are spammers. I think the
DUL is an inferior solution. Who says dynamic IP email is bad? What
In spam-fighter lingo, a ``bulk friendly ISP'' is an ISP willing to
tolerate its users sending unsolicited bulk email, which is one of the
more common definitions for spam. (Although not all spam fighters
agree on that definition.)
What about solicited bulk email? A customer may quite
I know I am missing something,
but being a novice,
I feel it is OK to ask.
I understand that when I route my
mail through my IPS smarthost,
I can get 'undeliverable messages'
warning etc sent to me through
the smarthost.
But remember that my original
DUL rejection
(the one which started this
I am thinking about writing an online book called "Learning how to program
in perl" which will teach those who don't know programming how to program
in perl.
While the final book will be in HTML, I'd like to have the following
requirements for the format I'll use to write it:
1. The source
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 04:57:06PM +0200, Adam Morrison wrote:
This figure is misleading anyway. Pure Unix has 5 system calls - open(),
read(), write(), close() and fcntl(). And fcntl() hides 700 different
things.
Uh, no. (Btw, what's ``pure Unix''?)
'Pure Unix' - the Unix you read
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Eran Man wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
i was wondering, before i spend several hours downloading and cinfiguring
wine, whether it can run hebrew versions of windows programs?
i tried it at the time with win 3.11 (I currently, hopefully not long run
a 486) and got
Check out the latex2html package (you probably need to find the right name
for your distro).
I have not tried it so I don't know if it suits your requirments, but it
might.
Will also give you the advantage that you can print the output using latex
if you whish later.
You can also try to check
19 matches
Mail list logo
