On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: Cc:":
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i
Omer Zak wrote:
I have the following idea for a Linux based firewall, which will hopefully
make it safer to connect a LAN to the Internet.
Not a bad shot at all, but here are two suggestion for improvements:
The first is to disable CD-ROM and HD completely and use the LRP(*1)
distribution
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote about "Re: OT: To: Cc:":
BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
people use Mutt anyway?
Let's start a poll ;)
My mailer history was using mailx (a.k.a. Mail) until about 1992, when I
switched to elm, and only about a year
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
You sort-of missed the point - if people were using vi sendmail to send
replies, then indeed almost nobody will reply to both the person on the
list (except the people who _deliberately_ want to do that, but most people
don't).
Huh? I'm not sure why
1. When I'm tring to run GTK app (like xchat or gnapster) it seems to freeze,
but after 4 mins it runs.
why ?
2. I have apache 1.3. I can't access to the server with http://localhost or
127.0.0.1 .
Thanks
--
Yoav Bornstein.
Listen to Weird Al and George Carlin, watch South Park, use Linux
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: Cc:":
I use sometimes pine, sometimes mutt and sometimes MH. In each case,
I usually either reply to the person specifically, or reply to the
list in general and the person -- unless I remember that this
person does not like to
Hi, Nadav!
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:38:32PM +0200, you wrote the following:
2. The lists mentioned on these directives have other side-effects besides
making "L" work. The most annoying side-effect (for me) is that for every
mailing list message, in the message list, you see the
Hi list,
I haven't yet got ADSL. I use Linux exclusively here, and was
wondering - is it possible at all to choose different ISPs
and use them with your own username/password (on subscribtion
basis) rather than use guest accounts and pay per-minute
(as in a post I read here lately),
without
Seems you can transparently define your external router IP ( ISP router )
sitting on the other side of your bridge/firewall as default gateway for all
the protected machines. The bridge cares to provide you with ARP responce
for routers's MAC.
For your second question, see my post for the guy who asked how to configure
the simplest win-linux network. i.e. if you would give us some details of
how you configured the server, or what errors you are getting it might help
us solve your problem.
Just as a side wonder ... did you start the
Alex Shnitman wrote:
Hi, Gilad!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, you wrote the following:
The second is to NOT configure your firewall as a router, but rather as
a layer 2 bridge with IP firwalling rules(*2) and not give it an IP at
all (bridges don't need to have an IP
Yngvi(*) wrote:
Seems you can transparently define your external router IP ( ISP router )
sitting on the other side of your bridge/firewall as default gateway for all
the protected machines. The bridge cares to provide you with ARP responce
for routers's MAC.
Right on the first sentence,
1. I did not mean that bridge answers the ARP requests - sorry for my
incorrect fraise construction.
2. We have all-Hebrew company, My Mailer is MS Outlook which I have to keep
open during the working day. I do not know how to configure it not to send
my name in Hebrew and the Exchange
I wasn't sure I should answer this on the list since it's slightly off-topic,
but there is a **LINUX perspective** here, so
The current situation with ADSL under LINUX is that Bezeq allows you to choose
from a list of ISPs and you can change whenever you want. As I wrote before,
two of them
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Other methods of configuration could be very well added. How about
attaching an GSM phone to the machine and accepting instruction only
from SMS messages coming from a certain phone number.
That's a rather insecure way, BTW.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 06:32:23PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, in my case, I have an account with barak-online (not ADSL) and all my
e-mail is sent via that account's POP mail. I also have a few other accounts
(aquanet, netvision, etc.) and I receive e-mail at all of the accounts. I
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Other methods of configuration could be very well added. How about
attaching an GSM phone to the machine and accepting instruction only
from SMS messages coming from a certain
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 12:50:32PM +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Other methods of configuration could be very well added. How about
attaching an GSM phone to the machine and accepting instruction only
from SMS messages coming from a certain phone number.
Any attacker which is after your stuff and is able to penetrate a GSM
exchange and send an unauthrized message without anyone noticing
(remember that banks rely on the number as a ID good enough to identify
you and divolge your account details on SMS)
Hey... Gilad, I expected better from
Aviram Jenik wrote:
Any attacker which is after your stuff and is able to penetrate a GSM
exchange and send an unauthrized message without anyone noticing
(remember that banks rely on the number as a ID good enough to identify
you and divolge your account details on SMS)
Hey... Gilad,
Hi,
I am having sendmail 8.9.3 as a mail server and users complain that if
they forward a letter with an attachment, the attachment gets
garbled. Funnily this happens only for the Windows users. I tried
increasing the MIME header parameters to no avail.
This very version of sendmail is serving
Hi, Ely!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:20:13PM +0200, you wrote the following:
what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
I've posted the vote results on linux-il some time ago. You can see
them at http://www.egroups.com/surveys/iglu?id=374380 . It's 11 to 8
against having the
more people then in kmail:-)
what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote:
| On Tuesday 28 November 2000 22:15, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
|
| You answer your own question.
Hello All,
I finally fixed my problem with help from someone on this newsgroup.
Anyway, quite a few people from this newsgroup privately wrote me and
extended an offer of help - and I want to express how much gratitude I have
to them.
Thanks again to all of you!
Moses
-Original
24 matches
Mail list logo
