Gold Edward [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding Oleg Goldshmidt message quoted bellow
Look, I really did not want to get bogged down in a flame
war like the ones that (saddly) errupted here and there on this list.
No one flamed anyone. I suggested staying away from Schildt's books,
and
Hi,
I hope its not ot, a friend asked me if he can run games specifically starcraft on
linux, since he wish to ditch windows. i searched the net and came across winex.
my question is, how well it works by measure of:
performance.
stability.
and also, if it comes ready to work with the redhat
hi
I'm programming in c, and crearing a progress bar
i.e :
while(!done)
{
..
..
printf(#)
..
..
}
the problem is that printf does not sync it's buffers until a newline
so no progress bar is displayed until the job ends.
how do i solve this ?
From: Erez Doron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that printf does not sync it's buffers until a newline
so no progress bar is displayed until the job ends.
how do i solve this ?
Try
fflush(stdout);
Sagi
=
To unsubscribe,
-Original Message-
From: Sagi Bashari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:39 PM
To: Erez Doron; ilug
Subject: Re: c question
From: Erez Doron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that printf does not sync it's buffers until
a newline
so no progress
thanks to all who replied
i mistakfully tried fsync instead of fflush
fflush solved my problem
erez.
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 13:39, Sagi Bashari wrote:
From: Erez Doron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that printf does not sync it's buffers until a newline
so no progress bar is displayed
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:02:13AM +0300, Herouth Maoz wrote:
[...]
I intend to sent the complaint not just to YP themselves, but also to
some newspapers. I don't know, Captain Internet, y-net, whatever.
FWIW, I intend to protest against this braindead restriction, do you have
a
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Omer Musaev wrote about RE: c question:
Instead of using buffered output and flushing it on every char,
you can use raw output.
..
---
write(1, #, 1 ) ; /* man write(2) */
sleep( 1 ) ;
This is getting into
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Dan Kenigsberg wrote about Re: Slightly OT: yellow pages blocks
our browsers:
They claim they can be reached on [EMAIL PROTECTED], or by phone
03-753.
The email doesn't work:
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:42:13 +0200
From: System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 02:29:48PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:02:13AM +0300, Herouth Maoz wrote:
[...]
I intend to sent the complaint not just to YP themselves, but also to
some newspapers. I don't know, Captain Internet, y-net, whatever.
FWIW, I
From: Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Dan Kenigsberg wrote about Re: Slightly OT: yellow
pages blocks our browsers:
They claim they can be reached on [EMAIL PROTECTED], or by
phone
03-753.
The email doesn't work:
They have a feedback form at
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:16:32PM +0300, Yotam Rubin wrote:
P.S.: Fellas, RTFH (Headers), do not CC me on list replies. It clogs up my
spool and serves no useful purpose.
man procmailex | col -b | vi - /duplicates
--
The ill-formed Orange
Fails to satisfy the eye:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: Slightly OT: yellow pages blocks our
browsers:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:16:32PM +0300, Yotam Rubin wrote:
P.S.: Fellas, RTFH (Headers), do not CC me on list replies. It clogs up my
spool and serves no useful purpose.
man procmailex |
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:28:57PM +0300, mulix wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:16:32PM +0300, Yotam Rubin wrote:
P.S.: Fellas, RTFH (Headers), do not CC me on list replies. It clogs up my
spool and serves no useful purpose.
man procmailex | col -b | vi - /duplicates
I already
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:42:44PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: Slightly OT: yellow pages blocks our
browsers:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:16:32PM +0300, Yotam Rubin wrote:
P.S.: Fellas, RTFH (Headers), do not CC me on list replies. It clogs up
Excuse the non-technical posting, but it is Linux-related, sort of.
At the meeting of the Jerusalem Linux Club which took place a few days
before Pessah at the IBM office in Jerusalem, somebody forgot a gray
pull-over. The owner is hereby invited to contact me by e-mail or by
phone (see
It has nothing to do with C (except the fact that most of the O.S. I know
has API is in C).
It has to do with the implementation by the OS + runtime library of the
printf and stderr. Anyhow, fputc is your friend. It doesn't solve your
problem but is more likely to use when writing single non
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Iftach Hyams wrote about RE: c question:
It has nothing to do with C (except the fact that most of the O.S. I know
has API is in C).
It has to do with the implementation by the OS + runtime library of the
printf and stderr.
This is not true. The standard IO library
winex needs wine,
in general the new version suppose to be stable
but I suggest waiting for wine 1.0 before really moving..
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
Hi,
I hope its not ot, a friend asked me if he can run games
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure, however, whether stdout's default buffering (see my
previous email) is mandated in the standard (Harbison Steele and
Kernighan Ritchie are very vague on this issue).
I doubt that buffering is specified in ANSI C. It is more likely to be
Attached a short program and a longer compilation output.
If I understand it correctly then the type
mapstring, string
is not acceptable.
But why? The compilation output mentions `reference to reference'. Can
you elaborate on this or do these 3 words say it all? Is this up to me
or is
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Omer Musaev wrote about RE: c question:
Instead of using buffered output and flushing it on every char,
you can use raw output.
..
---
write(1, #, 1 ) ; /* man write(2)
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote about Re: c question:
When I worked in Smart-Link and asked a more experienced fellow programmer
how I can, in the Win32 RTL, convert an open() filehandle to its Windows
HFILE equivalent, he told me that mixing IO for two different kinds of
handles is
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:00:36PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
write(1, World!\n, 7);
please use fileno(stdout). daemon writers everywhere will thank you.
--
The ill-formed Orange
Fails to satisfy the eye: http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~mulix/
Segmentation fault.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:00:36PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
write(1, World!\n, 7);
please use fileno(stdout). daemon writers everywhere will thank you.
You're right about the existance of the fileno() function, but I'm not
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:17:16PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:00:36PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
write(1, World!\n, 7);
please use fileno(stdout). daemon writers everywhere will thank you.
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Attached a short program and a longer compilation output.
If I understand it correctly then the type
mapstring, string
is not acceptable.
But why? The compilation output mentions `reference to reference'. Can
you elaborate on this or do
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:17:16PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
stdout = fopen(/my/logging/file);
stderr = fopen(/my/other/logging/file);
Ok, I get your point. I don't remember seeing any program doing something
like that, but
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:47:13PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, mulix wrote about Re: c question:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:17:16PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
stdout = fopen(/my/logging/file);
stderr = fopen(/my/other/logging/file);
Ok, I get your point. I
Just wanted to quote an amuzing experience I had in the single haifux
club meeting I attended. I made a comment about something only working
on Linux, and having to use X in order to make it Unix compatible, and
got bemused looks from everyone around me saying This is a Linux
meeting. Sigh.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:03:40PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Just wanted to quote an amuzing experience I had in the single haifux
club meeting I attended. I made a comment about something only working
on Linux, and having to use X in order to make it Unix compatible, and
got bemused
-Original Message-
From: Shaul Karl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [C++] What is wrong with mapstring, string ?
Attached a short program and a longer compilation output.
If I understand it correctly then the
Needs wine? it is a version of wine ;)
As for stability and performance - it's MUCH better then the standard Wine. Of
course - it's a commercial release - so you'll need to subscribe at least for
a month ($5) in order to download it.
The CVS version of WIneX doesn't have the copy protection
It seems though, that you can download the source code (winex) and compile it yourself
without the need to subscribe (and end up with the same result of the prepackaged
deal, with ms*.dll,etc..). Did i understand that correctly? and how hard will it be to
compile? or are there rtfms for that
On Thursday 04 April 2002 09:49 pm, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
It seems though, that you can download the source code (winex) and compile
it yourself without the need to subscribe (and end up with the same result
of the prepackaged deal, with ms*.dll,etc..). Did i understand that
correctly? and how
1. Is there anyone with legal background and familiarity with the
lawmaking work in the Knesset, who can tell us if there is any risk
that laws like the DMCA or SSSCA/CBDTPA will be enacted in Israel?
2. Are there any international treaties, to which Israel is signatory,
which require
Omer Zak wrote:
1. Is there anyone with legal background and familiarity with the
lawmaking work in the Knesset, who can tell us if there is any risk
that laws like the DMCA or SSSCA/CBDTPA will be enacted in Israel?
2. Are there any international treaties, to which Israel is signatory,
Hello Shachar,
It's great that you agree to contribute some of your time to this
important cause instead of just sitting on your hands.
I believe that the first step is to assess the current situation. The
biggest threats to intellectual freedom in Israel come from the following
directions:
1.
Given the political question, the answer was bound to be political too, so
people who are sensitive about that, please pass on to the next posting...
Thanks you.
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002, Omer Zak wrote about DMCA, SSSCA/CBDTPA related laws in
Israel?:
1. Is there anyone with legal background and
On Thursday 04 April 2002 12:29, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
p.s: if any1 plays starcraft, can u tell me if you can play it on the
internet with the winex?
starcraft runs perfectly on wine. just compile --enable-opengl.
i use an empty windows/system directory and the game works off the box
(where the
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, mulix wrote:
all too true, however, i doubt you'll find many haifux members on that
particular list of people.
oh, i think i can name at least one :)
looking at the list of last ten lectures, i would classify 5 as linux
specific, although in a broad sense of the word,
Here's a fast answer - they screwed in the first time - wait few more days
(and check the RPM dates!) for a new RPMS...
I informed them Tal's problem with kpersonalizer and the arts problem (no
sound)...
Maybe the 2nd time they'll make it work - I'm using RH 7.2 RPMS here and it
works
On Friday 05 April 2002 02:24, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Here's a fast answer - they screwed in the first time - wait few more days
(and check the RPM dates!) for a new RPMS...
I informed them Tal's problem with kpersonalizer and the arts problem (no
sound)...
Maybe the 2nd time they'll make it
43 matches
Mail list logo