On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Dear Linuxers,
I'm struggling here with some SPEC files here to recreate some RPMS for the
upcoming RedHat 8.0 (boy, this is either a laughing version or a crying one -
when I compile aRTs I get virtual exhausted memory although I got 512MB
RAM, 1GB
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 18:45, Sagi Bashari wrote:
Last time I checked I had problem with compiling it and it didn't support
hebrew well.
Can you comment about the hebrew support? any conflicts between VIM's
support and QT's?
well, i used the binary for debian, didnt compile from
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Dear Linuxers,
So I was thinking - does anyone knows a good (commercial or open source) tool
which knows how to create complex spec files? with all the stuff like pre and
post install stages, relocatable RPMS, and the
Supporting anything but your distro is quite impossible if you want to use
the neat macros that each distribution supplies, and don't want to go for
the lowest denominator or do all the hardwork about guessing architecture,
library locations, etc'. my solution is to build RPMs for my
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
My self - I write my SPEC files on a syntax highlighted editor (Kate)
and use parts of other people's SPEC files when I want to do something
which I'm not yet sure how to do.
Actually, I sometimes use vim, as its syntax hilighting
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Amir Tal wrote:
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 18:45, Sagi Bashari wrote:
Can you comment about the hebrew support? any conflicts between VIM's
support and QT's?
well,i used the binary for debian, didnt compile from source.
it uses the qt support for hebrew, and wirks
voguemaster wrote:
Supporting anything but your distro is quite impossible if you want to use
the neat macros that each distribution supplies, and don't want to go for
the lowest denominator or do all the hardwork about guessing architecture,
library locations, etc'. my solution is
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, voguemaster wrote:
Supporting anything but your distro is quite impossible if you want to use
the neat macros that each distribution supplies, and don't want to go for
the lowest denominator or do all the hardwork about guessing architecture,
library locations, etc'. my
Hi list.
I've read in the e-zines yesterday about the OpenSSL speed test and
there was some discussion about how recompiling OpenSSL for a specific
processor architecture can increase performance. I remember a discussion
on the list about how to make your linux run faster by recompiling major
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
...
First I've run the OpenSSL speed test on several machines I have
access to, and summerized the 512b and 4096b keys verifys/sec. to make
a long story short, the AMD Duron 700MHz I'm running at home had
7202,202 respectivly, while the P4 1.5GHz I'm running
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
I've read in the e-zines yesterday about the OpenSSL speed test and
there was some discussion about how recompiling OpenSSL for a specific
processor architecture can increase performance. I remember a discussion
on the list about how tomake
i don't know what is it for, but if it is for commercial purposes, there are hardware
solutions in the form
of pci addon cards that can allow you to maintain scalability without buying more
computers.
(rack mounts constrains, etc...)
searching in google: ssl accelerator
some are expensive some
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Oded Arbel wrote:
I tried to recompile OpenSSL for my Penitum 4 - apparently it wasn't
that easy. supposedly Iwould just need to rpm -bb --target pentium4 on
my linux, but apparently the OpenSSL configure script always sets -m486
unless
Tzahi Fadida wrote:
i don't know what is it for, but if it is for commercial purposes, there are hardware
solutions in the form
of pci addon cards that can allow you to maintain scalability without buying more
computers.
(rack mounts constrains, etc...)
searching in google: ssl accelerator
Guy Baruch wrote:
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
...
First I've run the OpenSSL speed test on several machines I have
access to, and summerized the 512b and 4096b keys verifys/sec. to
make a long story short, the AMD Duron 700MHz I'm running at home had
7202,202 respectivly, while the
So the question remains: how do I rebuild rpms with optimal optimization
flags?
Let's assume that the packagers did a good job, and the aptimization flags
are being properly transfered to the compiler. If not, it is a bug of the
specific rpm package.
rpm curently includes 'i386', 'i486' 'i586',
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
So the question remains: how do I rebuild rpms with optimal optimization
flags?
optimaly ( ;- ) one would simply use --target arch . or better yet -
put in a macro to autodetect the optimal architecture (shouldn't be hard).
rpm curently includes 'i386', 'i486' 'i586',
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Edward Gold wrote:
Can someone give any sort of pointer to a replacement of an Advantech
PCI-1750 I/O card (this one, that we want to replace does not support
Linux).
We need a card with a Linux driver.
Considering the simplicity of the card, any semi-competent
It's not my project -- I'm just supervising and my main project is far
more
inportant. We can give the card to another department (i.e. no money
lost),
and anyway, after writing the driver one still have to check it
throughfully, and we're short on schedule
(got enough problem introducing Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Debian-il [EMAIL PROTECTED]
two list located on israel. Please
next time if you want to post such mails, do it separatly. One for each list,
remember some of us dont have fast internet connection and do not have to get
all those postings twise.
Thank you.
- diego
Oops, we're continuing to crosspost this thread too :(
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002, Diego Iastrubni wrote about Corss posting (was Re: Kvim):
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Debian-il [EMAIL PROTECTED]
two list located on israel. Please
There's another reason why crossposting to two lists like linux-il
21 matches
Mail list logo
