On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 07:43, Kfir Lavi wrote:
is there a problem with cardbus in linux?
do you have any recomendation about 16/32 bit?
tnx
I may be completly and utterly wrong here, but I was under the
impression that cardbus == 32bit and pc card == 16 bit...
Anyways, Linux supports 16 bit
Hi,
I have RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3 running on a HP omnibook laptop with
a combo adapter 3c556 which includes a 3Com Mini PCI Modem
below a section from /etc/sysconfig/hwconf with the MODEM definition:
What should I do in order to have modem support including a device
reference /dev/modem?
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
In a completly unrelated note: are you an amateur radio operator and
46is1 is your call sign? if so - where can I buy a radio receiver in
Israel? (obviously, I mean the kind of receiver used for amateur radio
bands, not Galgaltaz...)
Thanks,
Gilad.
Don't you need to get
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
In a completly unrelated note: are you an amateur radio operator and
46is1 is your call sign? if so - where can I buy a radio receiver in
Israel? (obviously, I mean the kind of receiver used for
amateur radio
bands, not Galgaltaz...)
Thanks,
Gilad.
Don't
Gilad asked:
In a completly unrelated note: are you an amateur radio operator and
46is1 is your call sign? if so - where can I buy a radio receiver in
Israel? (obviously, I mean the kind of receiver used for amateur radio
bands, not Galgaltaz...)
As far as I know, there are NO stores in
Try AES (www.aesham.com) or Universal Radio. AES has better prices,
Universal has better service.
Or http://www.mct.co.il/ - They sell Kenwood equipment as a side business - the guy
Meir is a ham
Or iCom - http://www.stggroup.co.il/ (they don't mention it on their site for some
reason)
Or
That is what I was afraid of.
I was hoping the information you mentioned is not up-to-date.
Is there a free service to send faxes using the Internet?
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 11:05, David Harel wrote:
Hi,
I have RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3 running on a HP omnibook laptop
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003, Arik Baratz wrote about RE: HAM radio (was: pcmcia cardbus
lan):
Try AES (www.aesham.com) or Universal Radio. AES has better prices,
Universal has better service.
This is completely off-topic (as this thread was from the start...), but
I am curious:
Many years ago,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote:
This is completely off-topic (as this thread was from the start...), but
I am curious:
Many years ago, ham radio was a very interesting way to meet people from
other countries, chat with them, and get to know the world without living
your home and
Then the Technion launched their sattelite, they have used ham radio
frequencies to communicate with it. The agreement with them
was that the
sattelite will become a ham sattelite for data communication
(9600 baud)
after the Technion have their way with it. Never happened, though.
Aviram Jenik wrote:
Then the Technion launched their sattelite, they have used ham radio
frequencies to communicate with it. The agreement with them
was that the
sattelite will become a ham sattelite for data communication
(9600 baud)
after the Technion have their way with it. Never
Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt on Tue, Feb 25, 2003:
Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there anything, which is original Israeli, and which is offered to
gullible people to test their gullibility?
The network bridge developed by an Israeli startup perfectly
positioned to take over the dark
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Feb 24, 2003:
yes, certainly, I'm aware of make -j 3, but two
separate projects which look at different files and parts of the
disk (causing lots of head skips, cache threshing etc)?
The compiler run, from system resources usage point of view, is
consisting of
Arik Baratz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sorry, but you are misinformed. There was a SECOND sattelite
(named TechSat 2), it DID go up, and it is functioning perfectly
to-date. The Technion, however, did not repay the ham radio community
for the bandwidth that was allocated to them and the
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I understood, people are complaining that icc takes
more time to compile the same files than gcc.
It makes sense to me that a compiler that optimizes better with take
more time.
--
Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Arik Baratz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sorry, but you are misinformed. There was a SECOND sattelite
(named TechSat 2), it DID go up, and it is functioning perfectly
to-date. The Technion, however, did not repay the ham radio community
for the bandwidth that was
Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt on Tue, Feb 25, 2003:
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I understood, people are complaining that icc takes
more time to compile the same files than gcc.
It makes sense to me that a compiler that optimizes better with take
more time.
Yes, it's
Only the reason it never happened was the Satellite crashed
during take
off
I'm sorry, but you are misinformed. There was a SECOND
sattelite (named
TechSat 2), it DID go up, and it is functioning perfectly
to-date.
I stand corrected (and I just felt like the scene in the time
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 02:27:01PM +0200, David Harel wrote:
That is what I was afraid of.
I was hoping the information you mentioned is not up-to-date.
Is there a free service to send faxes using the Internet?
I believe that sending fax using the Internet was discussed several
time on
what is the best for complicated mathematical notations ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Oron Peled
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 7:05 PM
To: Eli Segal
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Software design document
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 06:30:52PM +0200, kfir lavi wrote:
what is the best for complicated mathematical notations ?
Tex, LaTeX, LyX, no contest.
MS Word equation editor if you're feeling masochist.
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is the conversion to pdf is easy, with no faults?
-Original Message-
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:33 PM
To: kfir lavi
Cc: Oron Peled; Eli Segal; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Software design document
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:00:05PM +0200, kfir lavi wrote:
is the conversion to pdf is easy, with no faults?
Yes. Let me know if you want to see my LaTeX makefile, which is based
on Oleg's. Also, make sure to follow the advice at
http://www.advogato.org/person/ladypine/diary.html?start=37 for
Shaul Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 02:27:01PM +0200, David Harel wrote:
That is what I was afraid of.
I was hoping the information you mentioned is not up-to-date.
Is there a free service to send faxes using the Internet?
One might try using: www.faxhozer.co.il
--
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, kfir lavi wrote:
is the conversion to pdf is easy, with no faults?
It is for English documents, but not for Hebrew documents if you wish them
to be viewed correctly with Acrobat Reader. I tried running pdfelatex on
documents with some Hebrew in it, and the generated PDF
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:16:45PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
It is for English documents, but not for Hebrew documents if you wish them
to be viewed correctly with Acrobat Reader. I tried running pdfelatex on
documents with some Hebrew in it, and the generated PDF still looks
horrible in
Hi!
After I installed the Mozilla Googlebar:
http://googlebar.mozdev.org/
Whenever I invoke Mozilla (as any user and profile) I get a menu-bar
whose fonts are not displayed at all. The other toolbars (navigation and
bookmarks) are displayed fine as is the various tabs of the sidebar, but
still
I'm afraid I'll have to chill out the optimism a bit. The original post asked
about writing a complicated /hebrew/ document. The situation of ivritex, the
hebrew support for LaTeX, is far from perfect. Ready yourself for an odd bug
oneic in a while, and using a good font is still a problem (at
Two unrelated CDROM issues - the first should interest KDE users and the
second should interest MDK9.0 users.
1 - I came across a really nice program to make it easy to mount an ISO image
as a virtual CDROM in KDE. After installing the program, right clicking on an
ISO shows a new menu item -
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:16:45PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
It is for English documents, but not for Hebrew documents if you wish them
to be viewed correctly with Acrobat Reader. I tried running pdfelatex on
documents with some Hebrew in it,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:00:05PM +0200, kfir lavi wrote:
is the conversion to pdf is easy, with no faults?
Yes. Let me know if you want to see my LaTeX makefile, which is based
on Oleg's. Also, make sure to follow the advice at
BTW: is there any script that is equivalent of MikTeX's texify? It would
save much of the dirtier parts of that makefile.
I use latexmk, a perl script, which does the same thing (runs perl /
bibtex the appropriate number of times)
It can be downloaded from CTAN:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 08:12:02PM +0200, Jason Friedman wrote:
BTW: is there any script that is equivalent of MikTeX's texify? It would
save much of the dirtier parts of that makefile.
I use latexmk, a perl script, which does the same thing (runs perl /
bibtex the appropriate number of
On 2003-02-25, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
I'm afraid I'll have to chill out the optimism a bit. The original post asked
about writing a complicated /hebrew/ document. The situation of ivritex, the
hebrew support for LaTeX, is far from perfect. Ready yourself for an odd bug
oneic in a while, and
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 16:59, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From what I understood, people are complaining that icc takes
more time to compile the same files than gcc.
It makes sense to me that a compiler that optimizes better with take
more time.
But
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: Software design document:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 06:30:52PM +0200, kfir lavi wrote:
what is the best for complicated mathematical notations ?
Tex, LaTeX, LyX, no contest.
There's also Texmacs, what supposedly is cross between TeX and
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: Software design document:
is the conversion to pdf is easy, with no faults?
Yes. Let me know if you want to see my LaTeX makefile, which is based
on Oleg's. Also, make sure to follow the advice at
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:28:44PM +0200, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
Having said that, it is feasible - and even recomended (since your document is
complicated and full of features, we might earn a couple of bug fixes :) )
I'd like to use UTF-8 but I can't manage to get omega/lambda to show
yesterday again ! when i went out of fvwm to gdm
it lock on gdm and nothing worked even SysRq didn't
(and i have and tested it)
this is very strange as in happens only when I'm on gdm
Anyhow i moved to xdm and i'll see if it happen again.
OT : I found some really nice XDM screenshots with their
Let's say that I have a complex project, using many Makefiles. In some
of them, I'd like to refer to other directories of the project. So
far, I've been using various combinations on ../, ../../, etc, but
that's awfully brittle when you start moving directories around (not
to mention potentially
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:33:08AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
If you send it to your boss, while telling him that, you might get
fired. The first document I prepared with LaTeX (an English one) I sent to a
TAU education professor in PostScript format. He told me he cannot read
PS and asked for
How can I change my menu to display english instead of hebrew
(it actually gibrish right now)
thanx
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: Software design document:
is the conversion to pdf is easy, with no faults?
Yes. Let me know if you want to see my LaTeX makefile, which is based
on Oleg's. Also, make sure to follow the
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 07:35:02PM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
I have a hebrew document sitting on the table next to me, made with
LaTeX, viewed by gv and acroread and printed through acroread, and it
looks absolutely fine, even the hebrew parts. If
44 matches
Mail list logo
