Title: Configuring Motorola SB4200 on USB to connect on debian
Hi,
Anyone had any luck doing this ?
Baruch Shpirer
Windows/*nix System & Network Admin.
Mobile +972-67-777167
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" Beyond redemption and beneath contempt "
Hello,
I've followed the instructions of enabling PPPoE on Linux
as described at http://www.isoc.org.il/~doron/PPPoE.html
and it worked at first but now after a reboot it stopped.
I get multiple messages like "Timeout waiting for PADO packets"
and some "Timeout waiting for PADS packets". I tried
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 10:13:47PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003, Beni Cherniavsky wrote about "Re: SOLVED: Slow Linux response
> during disk operations (was: Testing on various computers needed)":
> > Another question: "fork bomb"s. I think this was much worse a few
> > years
May be the post is OT but some weeks ago i wrote a latter about problems
connecting to rh8 httpd server that was connected by
internet zahav ADSL service. The problem was that some people simply
unable to get any response from the server. After calling the
technician support and explaining the prob
On Sunday 15 June 2003 21:22, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:01:07PM +0300, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
> > the system gets completely stuck for a few seconds. Increasing the
> > number increases the stuck time. Isn't a unix suppossed to protect
> > users from such DOS attacks in
Nadav Har'El wrote on 2003-06-15:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003, Beni Cherniavsky wrote about "Re: SOLVED: Slow Linux response
> during disk operations (was: Testing on various computers needed)":
>
> > Perhaps it does: curiously enough, after doing this a dozen times, it
> > seems that linux has "learn
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote on 2003-06-15:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:01:07PM +0300, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
>
> > the system gets completely stuck for a few seconds. Increasing the
> > number increases the stuck time. Isn't a unix suppossed to protect
> > users from such DOS attacks in some way (ju
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003, Beni Cherniavsky wrote about "Re: SOLVED: Slow Linux response
during disk operations (was: Testing on various computers needed)":
> Another question: "fork bomb"s. I think this was much worse a few
> years ago but still, when I do::
>
> perl -e 'for $i (1..15) { fork();
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:01:07PM +0300, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
> the system gets completely stuck for a few seconds. Increasing the
> number increases the stuck time. Isn't a unix suppossed to protect
> users from such DOS attacks in some way (just checked, executing it
> from another user ha
On my system (RedHat 9):
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.4.20-8 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)) #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST
2003
# hdparm -d /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
using_dma= 1 (on)
When I did ``cat /dev/zero > junk``, the system did become
half-irre
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> and (at least on redhat) take a look at /etc/sysconfig/harddisks , to
> avoid re-running it manually.
Don't enable DMA using hdparm on 865/875 Intel chipsets when using the
SATALink buses, the drives stop responding and the system hangs.
--Ariel
>
> --
if he was running it manually they it wouldn't have mattered;)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 12:06:01PM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote:
> > Hello All.
> >
> > Bottom line: If you haven't done it yet, beco
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 12:06:01PM +0200, Eli Billauer wrote:
> Hello All.
>
> Bottom line: If you haven't done it yet, become root on your computer
> and go:
>
> hdparm /dev/hda
>
> or whatever hdX you have as your hard disk.
and (at least on redhat) take a look at /etc/sysconfig/harddisks ,
As one can understand from my previous posting, I like my Linux box
running steadily, so I'm not so happy doing these tests, unless it's
really critical for someone.
Besides, the sound interface is now recognized too, which is a nice
bonus ;).
Eli
Guy Baruch wrote:
Just out of curiosity:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 12:18:42PM +0300, Guy Baruch wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity: can you run the same test with 2.4.18.3 and
> preemptive-kernel patch ?
> IIRC it was incorporated in 2.4.20 (+-1) , which may explain the change
> from 2.4.18 to 2.4.21.
No, it wasn't. In vanilla kernels,
Just out of curiosity: can you run the same test with 2.4.18.3 and
preemptive-kernel patch ?
IIRC it was incorporated in 2.4.20 (+-1) , which may explain the change
from 2.4.18 to 2.4.21.
--
-- regards
+---
+ Guy Baruch , Plas
Hello All.
Bottom line: If you haven't done it yet, become root on your computer
and go:
hdparm /dev/hda
or whatever hdX you have as your hard disk.
You'll have a line saying "using_dma = 1 (on)". But if the line says
that your DMA is off, I suggest start thinking about doing something
about
Quoting Dittigas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In KDE I've noticed that when Keyboard is fixed on Hebrew (e.g. with
> Alt+Ctrl+K) you can switch back and forth with Alt+Shift, if enabled in
> XF86Config. If fixed on US, it will not work. Guess this might indicate
> something.
I don't know about you all,
Can I feed elatex utf-8 encoded text files to use with babel's hebrew
support? Seems to work for me with iso-8859-8, but can't find any
refrences for utf-8.
thanks,
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "un
19 matches
Mail list logo
