Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
But do other distributions keep the Israeli timezone up-to-date out
of the box? I didn't know about the link above and didn't have to go
AFAIK that's impossible to keep Israeli timezone up-to-date out of the box
for a prolonged period of times - Israeli timezone
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:42:28AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Shaul Karl wrote:
It seemed to work fine for two weeks or so. Not any longer.
Is there any specific reason why you are sending this to a public list
rather than to the people who maintain the mirror?
1. I believe that
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 03:59:44AM +0300, Oded Arbel wrote:
You can't go wrong with a BT powered card, but also check USB frame grabbers -
Ah! I like the USB framegrabber idea. I like modular options.
Thanks.
--Amos
=
To
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 04:33:11PM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
(I don't recall touching mod_proxy, can anyone show me what
a virgin apache config file looks like?)
apache installed from a deb? Does downloading the deb and extracting
the default config files out of it don't work?
Nope.
I'm having troubles with a DOS program running from a samba 3 share.
When I close the program it tells:
General failure reading drive F
Abort, Retry, Fail?
(F is a network drive mapped on the samba share)
I have increased smbd debug level and after retrying I have this in the log:
[2003/09/28
Shaul Karl wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:42:28AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Shaul Karl wrote:
It seemed to work fine for two weeks or so. Not any longer.
Is there any specific reason why you are sending this to a public list
rather than to the people who maintain the
On Sunday 28 September 2003 08:40, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Ariel Biener wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani wrote:
4. is it secure?
Depends on how you implement it.
I think this needs clarification:
It can be secure. All you have to do is install an IPSec VPN on all
Oded Arbel wrote:
Assuming we are talking about WiFi here
...
I'm told its quite secure once
you get it turned on.
That depends on how secure you want to get. WEP (Wire Equivalent
Privacy) is quite secure in the sense that it takes several minutes to
crack. This applies to the 56bit as
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
It can be secure. All you have to do is install an IPSec VPN on all
machines participating in the network, and not let anyone who is not VPN
authenticated get to either your internal network *or the internet*!
I am looking into the same thing as I have a guest comming
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
It can be secure. All you have to do is install an IPSec VPN on all
machines participating in the network, and not let anyone who is not VPN
authenticated get to either your internal network *or the internet*!
I am looking into the
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
How would that stop a spammer parked outside your house from sending spam?
oops, I forgot to mention that the DHCP server would be set to only
provide IP addresses to a known MAC address and the SMTP server would
only allow incoming connections from the VPN.
This also
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
How would that stop a spammer parked outside your house from sending spam?
You are going to unneeded and plain useless extremes. Spammers will not
travel around in cars with wireless detectors to send spam from their
laptop via the poor man's
Hi,
Recently I have been getting this wierd error from my kernel, after some
time my machine is up:
VM: killing process sh
This is followed by not being able to run commands like ps, pptp,
and others, and the way I found to solve it, is just to reboot. (bahhh,
this is not windows)
My first
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi,
This is eactly the reason why I answered `depends on the
implementation'. There are a few ways to implement a wireless network, and
there is a set of reasonable requirements for security @home, this set is
different than the requirements
Ariel Biener wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi,
This is eactly the reason why I answered `depends on the
implementation'. There are a few ways to implement a wireless network, and
there is a set of reasonable requirements for security @home, this set is
different than the
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 04:20:08PM +0300, Noam Meltzer wrote:
Hi,
Recently I have been getting this wierd error from my kernel, after some
time my machine is up:
VM: killing process sh
grepping the kernel sources shows this (in arch/i386/mm/fault.c):
/*
* We ran out of memory, or some
Ariel Biener wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
How would that stop a spammer parked outside your house from sending spam?
You are going to unneeded and plain useless extremes. Spammers will not
travel around in cars with wireless detectors to send spam from their
laptop
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'm sorry, but apparently you are ill informed. Spammers do, as a matter
of day to day matter, exploit Wifi to send anonymous email. The
phenomena is mostly documented in the US at the moment, but you can
never tell when it will make aliya.
Exploit
Ariel Biener wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'm sorry, but apparently you are ill informed. Spammers do, as a matter
of day to day matter, exploit Wifi to send anonymous email. The
phenomena is mostly documented in the US at the moment, but you can
never tell when it will
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Key exchange? What key exchange? If WEP had key exchange, it wouldn't be
so #$(%!$! broken. Well, maybe it would, who knows? In any case, WEP
has no key exchange, which is part of the problem.
Buy Cisco. Don't use WEP.
--
Ariel Biener
e-mail:
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 17:25, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 04:20:08PM +0300, Noam Meltzer wrote:
Hi,
Recently I have been getting this wierd error from my kernel, after some
time my machine is up:
VM: killing process sh
grepping the kernel sources shows this (in
Amir Hardon wrote:
I'm having troubles with a DOS program running from a samba 3 share.
When I close the program it tells:
General failure reading drive F
Abort, Retry, Fail?
(F is a network drive mapped on the samba share)
I have increased smbd debug level and after retrying I have this in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
My mail client (mutt) signs mail messages with several parts by putting
the pgp signature as a separate attachment. The mail client itself has
no problem verifying the signature of such an email. However, when I try
to verify the signature
It's a file,
I tried removing it, and the application created it again(as a file not a
directory).
This program was working on a samba 2.x (I don't remember the exact version)
share.
The server had a disk crash and I installed samba 3 and restored it from the
last backup.
On Sunday 28
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 12:15:42PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Shaul Karl wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:42:28AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Shaul Karl wrote:
It seemed to work fine for two weeks or so. Not any longer.
Is there any specific reason why you are sending this to a
Hi all,
The domain servers still need to be updated. Once they are, however,
linux.org.il is going to be pointing to a new, dedicated, site. This
site is meant to be a portal allowing at-a-glance overview in Hebrew of
all the Linux activity in Israel.
That's where I need your help - I'm no
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003, Moshe Kaminsky wrote about verifying mail signatures from the
command line:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Strange, it appears that the mail you sent was *not* signed using a seperate
attachment, but rather in a non-MIME way, so a simple gpg --verify should
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
The domain servers still need to be updated. Once they are, however,
linux.org.il is going to be pointing to a new, dedicated, site. This
site is meant to be a portal allowing at-a-glance overview in Hebrew of
all the Linux activity in
, 29 2003, 00:09,Shachar Shemesh:
Hi all,
The domain servers still need to be updated. Once they are, however,
linux.org.il is going to be pointing to a new, dedicated, site. This
site is meant to be a portal allowing at-a-glance overview in Hebrew of
all the Linux activity in Israel.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments:
1. MOST IMPORTANT: Change the encoding to ISO-8859-8-i or UTF-8, and use
characters instead of entities (see the source).
2. Change all the text to links (ofcourse).
3. Make an automatic redirect to iglu.org.il for not found pages:
(in Vhosts.conf)
There was a recent Ask Slashdot article about this exact topic, which I
found very helpful (look at the +4/+5 comments).
Shachar Tal
Verint Systems
-Original Message-
From: Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 12:12 AM
To: [EMAIL
31 matches
Mail list logo
