Uri Even-Chen wrote:
Hi people,
Today I had a meeting with people at a software company. We talked
about Linux, and they said that today there are versions of Linux which
are not Free Software.
That is true. The moment Linux means A Linux distribution, there is
nothing stopping you from
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 10:58, Nzer Zaidenberg wrote:
--0-2014809872-1153900712=:56848
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hello,
I am trying to set up fedora core 5.
i have downloaded the images from two different sources, burned them on
two
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 09:39:13AM +0300, Aharon Schkolnik wrote:
I had very similiar problems - couldn't manage to burn CDs that would pass
the
CD test. I finally gave up and risked using the CDs anyway. I had no problems
with the installations using the disks which failed the tests.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 09:24:28AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
Hi people,
Today I had a meeting with people at a software company. We talked
about Linux, and they said that today there are versions of Linux which
are not Free Software.
That is true. The moment
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Thu, 27 Jul:
They said that you buy a license for each
computer, and it's not legal to use it without a license. They referred
specifically to Red Hat.
Actually, RedHat are free, last time I checked. Either the company or
its local subsidiery (I
Quoting Yedidyah Bar-David, from the post of Thu, 27 Jul:
I talked to a rep a few months ago, and he told me I can't e.g. purchase
a license (or subscription, or whatever it's called) for one year,
install a machine with it, then continue using it for more than one
year, because of this
Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
I talked to a rep a few months ago, and he told me I can't e.g. purchase
a license (or subscription, or whatever it's called) for one year,
install a machine with it, then continue using it for more than one
year, because of this trademark thing.
That's false, and
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:52:20AM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
One substance. He wants to make money.
That's for sure. :-)
Every indication I have (and i did consult a lawyer)
shows that they cannot stop you from writing Derived from RedHat
Linux, however, assuming it is true.
You cannot
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:25:50AM +0300, Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
And this very definition might be quite significant regarding what you
can or can't do with the software. Isn't it?
I talked to a rep a few months ago, and he told me I can't e.g. purchase
a license (or subscription, or
Thank you, all, for your reply.
that's an effective PR machine that spreads misinformation and FUD. even
the people here on the list get confused.
It's embarrasing to admit that until 5 minutes ago, I had no idea what
FUD is. So I checked at [http://www.answers.com/FUD]. Here's what I
got
On 7/27/06, Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're confusing free as in the GPL and free as in beer. The GPL does not
restrict people from charging for their products, it requires that if you
release the source code for them.
But is it or is it not legal to install the binary
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
On 7/27/06, Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're confusing free as in the GPL and free as in beer. The GPL does
not
restrict people from charging for their products, it requires that if
you
release the source code for them.
But is it or is it not legal
Hello all,
I believe these might interest some of you. OLS 2006 recordings, courtesy of
Shawn Starr.
http://christian-leber.de/~ijuz/ols2006.torrent
--
Sincerely Yours,
Michael Vasiliev
This door is baroquen, please wiggle Handel.
(If I wiggle Handel, will it wiggle Bach?)
--
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:36:22PM +0300, Michael Vasiliev wrote:
Hello all,
I believe these might interest some of you. OLS 2006 recordings, courtesy of
Shawn Starr.
http://christian-leber.de/~ijuz/ols2006.torrent
Since you mentioned it, proceedings are at
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:51:20AM +0300, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
On 7/27/06, Geoffrey S. Mendelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But is it or is it not legal to install the binary (compiled) version
on more computers without a license? GPL should be free, also when
using the binary form of the
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 12:14:50PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
They cannot, in actuality. First of all, it is a GPL violation to modify
the kernel in such a way. Section 6: Each time you redistribute the
Program (or any work based on the Program), the recipient automatically
receives a
- Meir
***This email message and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named above, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If the reader of this message
On 7/27/06, Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
They may also include technical means to
prevent people from installing it without a license (such as
activation in Windows XP).
They cannot, in actuality. First of all, it is a GPL violation to modify
the kernel
On Thursday July 27 2006 12:50, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
Since you mentioned it, proceedings are at
http://www.linuxsymposium.org/2006/proceedings.php. The organizers
also asked the presenters to send their slides, so those should show
up on the site sometime too.
I check them on daily basis.
Hello I am trying to set up the latest version of WAS
trail on FC5.
I have downloaded WAS from IBM few days ago. it's
version 6.1
WAS has a web-based installer.
When i click on the Launch wesphere application
server trail link nothing happens.
copying the shortcut reveals its a link to
On Monday 24 July 2006 15:26, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Omer Zak wrote:
even FSF has a list of software
packages (at http://directory.fsf.org/).
Except I was never able to figure out what is this a list OF.
It has only 4,300 enteries, so it cannot possibly presume to be
complete. On the
Shlomi Fish wrote:
1. It is edited by a few editors (possibly even one) with some submissions
from the public.
2. Sometimes the editors find a package themselves and add it there, after
sending an email to the creator with clarifications.
Which doesn't explain how rsyncrypto made it there.
--Boundary_(ID_xwPbwSwhBJ/mhXVGHevZ3A)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1255; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
ideas to get the load lower? dspam any good? I think I asked that
before, but everything I implemented is still not helping much. I'll
feel really annoyed if I
Hi,
I have the following in xorg.conf:
Section InputDevice
Identifier Generic Keyboard
Driver kbd
Option CoreKeyboard
Option XkbRules xfree86
Option XkbModel pc104
Option XkbLayout us,il
Gil Freund wrote:
Hi,
I have the following in xorg.conf:
Section InputDevice
Identifier Generic Keyboard
Driver kbd
Option CoreKeyboard
Option XkbRules xfree86
Option XkbModel pc104
Option
On 7/27/06, Meir Kriheli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gil Freund wrote:
Hi,
I have the following in xorg.conf:
Section InputDevice
Identifier Generic Keyboard
Driver kbd
Option CoreKeyboard
Option XkbRules xfree86
On 7/27/06, Gil Freund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/27/06, Meir Kriheli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gil Freund wrote:
Hi,
I have the following in xorg.conf:
Section InputDevice
Identifier Generic Keyboard
Driver kbd
Option CoreKeyboard
On 7/27/06, ik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/27/06, Gil Freund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/27/06, Meir Kriheli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gil Freund wrote:
Hi,
I have the following in xorg.conf:
Section InputDevice
Identifier Generic Keyboard
Driver
28 matches
Mail list logo
