Hi Gilad,
Have you heard of KVM-lite ? (KVM that doesn't require virtualization
features from processor)
In what sense "KVM rocks", do we have any benchmark of KVM versus
VirtualBox ?
I saw a post from Ingo Molnar stating that context number of context
switches in KVM reduced dramatically
Hi,
We developed and support for years now a software product for tech support
centers that uses KVM as a hypervisor.
One installation at Canon in Japan runs 35 concurrent Vista/win2k/xp and
soon Win7 instances.
Each session is about a minute long (it is used by tech support people to
help them
Kvm lite is not very interesting.
As for VirtualBox - if you want to run one VM, especially if you are on win
or mac, virtualbox is really cool.
Whenthe amount of VMs is measured in tens, id use KVM.
Gilad
Amos Shapira wrote:
2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com sklia...@gmail.com:
Amos Shapira wrote:
2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com:
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM preview tech, I'm not an expert but got the
impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually.
Don't mean to dis
2009/9/16 Gilad Ben-Yossef gi...@codefidence.com:
Don't mean to dis Xen or anyone, but...
You can drop the eventually. KVM rocks :-)
Care to give more details? Especially compared to Xen?
I googled for kvm vs. xen but all the links I found so far talk
about KVM's potential (and are a bit
On Wednesday, 16 בSeptember 2009 00:24:16 Amos Shapira wrote:
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM preview tech, I'm not an expert but got the
impression that KVM might get things better than Xen eventually.
If your CPU support
2009/9/16 Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il:
On Wednesday, 16 בSeptember 2009 00:24:16 Amos Shapira wrote:
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM preview tech, I'm not an expert but got the
impression that KVM might get things better than Xen
On Sep 16, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
I've never considered VirtualBox (or VMware, for that matter) for
anything except that it's included in Ubuntu for desktop, and it had a
very easy interface to setup Windows quickly.
I saw the reference to libvirt in the RHEL 5.4 announcement
How is KVM as a desktop? I mean in VMWare there is a special windows display
driver which makes it look very natural (and resizeable)
For a server I would also support KVM, the only bad thing I have to say
about it is its buggy PXE rom stack.
Ohad
2009/9/16 Gilad Ben-Yossef
On Wednesday 16 September 2009 15:53:10 geoffrey mendelson wrote:
On Sep 16, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Amos Shapira wrote:
I've never considered VirtualBox (or VMware, for that matter) for
anything except that it's included in Ubuntu for desktop, and it had a
very easy interface to setup Windows
4GB should be enough. Right?
David Suna
da...@davidsconsultants.com
ronys wrote:
Hi,
Here's another vote for VirtualBox. Using it in both Windows host / Linux
guest, Linux(64bit) / Linux(32bit) and Linux / Windows. Integration with
host is excellent. Support is also quick responsive.
For me it works well with:
Ubuntu host + winXP 1GB guest + win7 1.5GB guest ( at the same time ).
--
Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and Director.
http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net.
Cellular: 054-4848113
Hi,
Depends.
Both Ubuntu and RedHat push KVM as the virtualization solution. IMHO it is
the fastest from the three. It is also most open one.
The free version of VirtualBox has no USB support but has excellent 3D
support, so it is ideal for games.
VMWare is ok, but I don't like it's integration
I'm using VMPlayer with Ubuntu running windows in a virtual machine and I
didn't need to do anything special to get audio running
I also like it very much that you can resize on the fly the virtual client,
very useful if you need to connect your server to an external beamer for
presentations etc.
2009/9/16 Arie Skliarouk sklia...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Depends.
Both Ubuntu and RedHat push KVM as the virtualization solution. IMHO it is
the fastest from the three. It is also most open one.
Yes. We use xen heavily on CentOS 5 at work and am pretty excited that
RH 5.4 is out with KVM preview
15 matches
Mail list logo
