Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-25 Thread Ury Segal
I know C, thank you. Then why did you ask? I am not asking, you #%@^! , I am giving you examples. = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo

C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Ury Segal
I got the feeling hat some people here think that C has a standard that is commonly followed, (more that C++ in any case.) This is SO FAR from the truth. C has profound standartzation problem, some of them built-in in the language. Let me give you some examples. 1) The "standard" IO library

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Ury Segal wrote: b. If you ar not familiar with sscanf, how about fopen(), eh ? Old timer, mentioned in KR. Even THIS has no standard. On most Windows/DOS compilers, if you does not use the letter "b" in the 2nd argument to open, it will

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000, Ury Segal wrote about ""C" is standartizied - In your dreams!": I got the feeling hat some people here think that C has a standard that is commonly followed, (more that C++ in any case.) This is SO FAR from the truth. C has profound standartzation p

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Vadim Vygonets
I mostly agree with Moshe Zadka and Nadav Har'el on the matter, but would still like to add something. Quoth Nadav Har'El on Mon, Jul 24, 2000: On Mon, Jul 24, 2000, Ury Segal wrote about ""C" is standartizied - In your dreams!": Let me give you some examples.

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000, Vadim Vygonets wrote about "Re: "C" is standartizied - In your dreams!": Register is only a recommendation to the compiler, and is a leftover from the times when the optimizer wasn't smart enough to do that on its own. Consider it as a finetun

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
"Ury Segal" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I got the feeling hat some people here think that C has a standard that is commonly followed, (more that C++ in any case.) I have a feeling that you are mixing up the existence of a standard that people writing code are "supposed" to follow, and the

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Ury Segal
Are you serious? DO you read what you are writing? It doesn;t matter if a standard exist, if not 99% of the implemetations follows it. I didn't give you examples where a standard lacks, I give you an example when IT IS NOT FOLLOWED. And , as in C++, IT IS ALSO NOT FOLLOWED. Dig it: C AND C++

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Ury Segal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 4:38 PM Subject: Re: "C" is standartizied - In your dreams! On Mon, Jul 24, 2000, Ury Segal wrote about ""C" is standartizied - In your dreams!": I got the feeling hat some people here

Re: C is standartizied - In your dreams!

2000-07-24 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Ury Segal wrote: Umm..."b" is always supported, and the default mode is *always* text. It just so happens that on UNIX, things happen to work even if you forget the "b". So what you are saying that there is no standard meaning for "b" and "t". Exactly my point: No