On Wed, Nov 03, 1999, Shlomi Fish wrote about "Eliminating Junk E-mail for List
members":
Right now, the Linux-IL archives list the senders of the messages along
with their E-mails. As it is, Spam harvesters can process the archives
looking for E-mail addresses. So, list subsc
At 22:30 +0200 on 03/11/1999, Nadav Har'El wrote:
I use a much simpler method on the Ivrix mailing-list archives: I simply
convert *everything* that looks like an email address to the string
"email@hidden". Granted, this way people will not be able to find any
emails in the archives, but I'm
The form-based solution (that the E-mail link will lead to a form where
people can send E-mail to the sender of the message.) sounds like a good
one to me. The point is how can I implement it?
What's the archives manager of the list? If I know that, then I'll be
able to add support for this
On 03-Nov-99 Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
I wonder if it's feasible to do some plugin like this to mhonarc, for
example. It would be very useful, not only for Linux-IL, but for many
other email archives.
Latest versions of mhonarc have this already. Installed it, so new messages
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 02:47:16PM +0200, Evgeny Stambulchik wrote:
I wonder if it's feasible to do some plugin like this to mhonarc, for
example. It would be very useful, not only for Linux-IL, but for many
other email archives.
Latest versions of mhonarc have this already. Installed
ES Latest versions of mhonarc have this already. Installed it, so
ES new messages will be stored with email headers mangled. Also,
ES the "X-no-archive:" header will be honoured.
Not exactly that. What I saw in latest mhonarc is killing mail addres
altogether, as opposed to extracting it and
On 04-Nov-99 Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
ES Latest versions of mhonarc have this already. Installed it, so
ES new messages will be stored with email headers mangled. Also,
ES the "X-no-archive:" header will be honoured.
Not exactly that. What I saw in latest mhonarc is killing
ES That's right, but why would one need email addresses from the
ES archives at all? I personally consider it as a source of
ES information, not emails :). A more serious problem, IMO, is that
ES only headers are affected; emails mentioned in the body of the
ES message (or signature) are passed
