This might be an interesting read:
User-Mode Linux Co-op
http://www.stearns.org/slartibartfast/uml-coop.current.html
Eran Tromer wrote:
On 2004/05/21 08:24, Oron Peled wrote:
If all else fails, how about spliting the cost of a dedicated server among,
say, 4-5 people that run their VPS on it? It
I just woke up,
This thread has evolved a bit.
As may be remembered I am looking for a solution for hosting my project.
A free project with lots of audio files. Currently I am developing on my
home box and using my old remote host as a backup. Thanks to those in
the group I switched to actcom
Eran Tromer wrote:
On 2004/05/21 08:24, Oron Peled wrote:
If all else fails, how about spliting the cost of a dedicated server among,
say, 4-5 people that run their VPS on it? It should be roughly equivalent
to what you look for, with the disatvantage that physical server management
isn't done by
Oron Peled wrote:
On Thursday 20 May 2004 12:22, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Dedicatde Server: - I get a full server which I supply myself, manages
myself with full access to hardware resources, including backups.
Provider supplies connectivity, UPS, IPs and rack space. Price point: 100$.
Single user
I only glanced at this article (not enough time on Friday). But you're right -
it does look very interesting. If anyone is seriously thinking of setting
something like this up and if the price is reasonable, I'd be interested in
joining the group.
On Friday 21 May 2004 09:13, Gil Freund
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 08:52:45AM +0300, Eran Tromer wrote:
On 2004/05/21 08:24, Oron Peled wrote:
If all else fails, how about spliting the cost of a dedicated server among,
say, 4-5 people that run their VPS on it? It should be roughly equivalent
to what you look for, with the
On Wed, May 19, 2004, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about Fwd: Re: [OT] Israeli hosting:
I think $100/month is a low price for what you're looking for.
Since Actcom offers 100$/month for a *dedicated server* it's obvious that a
virtual private server will cost less, so I don't see why you think so
On Thursday 20 May 2004 11:52, Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2004, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about Fwd: Re: [OT] Israeli
hosting:
I think $100/month is a low price for what you're looking for.
Since Actcom offers 100$/month for a *dedicated server* it's obvious that
a virtual private
On Thu, May 20, 2004, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote about Re: Fwd: Re: [OT] Israeli hosting:
Either I'm very poor at explaining myself or I am very poor at being
understood , so let's define a few terms, just for discussion:
No, I understood you perfectly. You didn't understand me :)
As you can see
On Thursday 20 May 2004 12:53, Nadav Har'El wrote:
Not quite. With all these solutions, you're paying for:
1 Your share of the hardware
2 Your share of the sysadmining costs
3 Your share of electricity and physical space
4 Your usage of bandwidth,
Now, let's compare:
Virtual hosting:
On Thursday 20 May 2004 12:22, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Dedicatde Server: - I get a full server which I supply myself, manages
myself with full access to hardware resources, including backups.
Provider supplies connectivity, UPS, IPs and rack space. Price point: 100$.
Single user on one
Fwd to the list on account of being stupid and posting from no subscribed
account
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Codefidence. A name you can trust (tm)
http://www.codefidence.com
I am Jack's Overwritten Stack Pointer
-- Hackers Club, the movie
---BeginMessage---
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
