On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: Cc:":
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
to mails to the sender _and_ to the l
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote about "Re: OT: To: Cc:":
BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
people use Mutt anyway?
Let's start a poll ;)
My mailer history was using mailx (a.k.a. Mail) until about 1992, when I
switched to elm, and only ab
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Nadav Har'El wrote:
You sort-of missed the point - if people were using vi sendmail to send
replies, then indeed almost nobody will reply to both the person on the
list (except the people who _deliberately_ want to do that, but most people
don't).
Huh? I'm not sure why
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote about "Re: OT: To: Cc:":
I use sometimes pine, sometimes mutt and sometimes MH. In each case,
I usually either reply to the person specifically, or reply to the
list in general and the person -- unless I remember that this
person doe
Hi, Nadav!
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 08:38:32PM +0200, you wrote the following:
2. The lists mentioned on these directives have other side-effects besides
making "L" work. The most annoying side-effect (for me) is that for every
mailing list message, in the message list, you see the
Hi, Ely!
On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 09:20:13PM +0200, you wrote the following:
what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
I've posted the vote results on linux-il some time ago. You can see
them at http://www.egroups.com/surveys/iglu?id=374380 . It's 11 to 8
against having the
more people then in kmail:-)
what happened to the vote btw?can I readd the replay header?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote:
| On Tuesday 28 November 2000 22:15, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
|
| You answer your own question.
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ?
In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the list, so is that
so hard to do that instead of
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
~
for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ?
In mutt you
Guy Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ?
In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the list,
And just when we thought the reply-to thread was dead for good ;)
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote about "Re: OT: To: Cc:":
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the
Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does mutt know what is list and what is a person?
Good point, i have forgot that.
in .muttrc put a line start with:
lists put any list here sperated by a space. For example i have there:
lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 28 November 2000 22:15, Jonathan Ben-Avraham wrote:
You answer your own question. The double reply is for folks who post
to lists to which they do not subscribe. Think about it.
Also to people who subscribe in digest mode, and may want to have an
immediate reply when they ask a
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Guy Cohen wrote:
I been away from the list for a while and beed reading the list again
for the last few days. I could not help but noticing pepoel reply
to mails to the sender _and_ to the list, and i ask you why ?
In mutt you press the "L" for replying only to the list,
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Herouth Maoz wrote:
BTW, my e-mailer is KMail. It has reply and reply-to-all. How many
people use Mutt anyway?
This sounds like the right time for a shameless plug: have you considered
the newly created MUA PMH? While it's only in pre-alpha, you might
want to play with
15 matches
Mail list logo
