-Original Message-
From: Mix Sella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
2) Enforceability - while legal action against junk fax
spammers is
enforceable due to the way POTS networks are build, it is not
so in the chaos
of All Internet. Spammers get nailed mostly due to their
From: Arik Baratz
I beg to differ. Robbers know that what they are doing is not
When was the last time you got a spam from the true address?
Why would they do that unless they wanted to try to cover their
tracks.
They would then proceed to claim that the police force is an
organized group
Regarding spam,
One has the right for privacy, including his e-mail address.
One who gains an e-mail address against the will, or without the knowing, of
the owner is breaking the law.
(I'm not a lawyer, I just felt like putting it out that way :)
On Monday 16 June 2003 17:15, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:32 PM
[snip]
Regarding spam,
One has the right for privacy, including his e-mail address.
One who gains an e-mail address against the will, or without
the knowing, of
the
Quoting Arik Baratz, from the post of Mon, 16 Jun:
I again beg to differ.
please stop splitting infinitives and stop this silly thread. it's very
off topic.
--
Smiting fools with clue-by-four since 1817
Ira Abramov
http://ira.abramov.org/email/
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 05:32:56PM +0300, Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani wrote:
Regarding spam,
One has the right for privacy, including his e-mail address.
One who gains an e-mail address against the will, or without the knowing, of
the owner is breaking the law.
(I'm not a lawyer, I just felt
-Original Message-
From: Mix Sella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
I beg to differ. Spammers know EXACTLY what they are doing.
Spammers are
perfectly aware that what they're doing is not legit.
Spammers do have
conferences and training, spammers employ more or less
On Monday 16 June 2003 17:48, Arik Baratz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Itay 'z9u2K' Duvdevani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 5:32 PM
[snip]
Regarding spam,
One has the right for privacy, including his e-mail address.
One who gains an e-mail address
On Monday 16 June 2003 18:02, Arik Baratz wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mix Sella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
I beg to differ. Spammers know EXACTLY what they are doing.
Spammers are
perfectly aware that what they're doing is not legit.
Spammers do have
conferences
-Original Message-
From: Mix Sella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
Let's try the real-world example of you posting your
address on a buletin
board for, say, giving private lessons.
Bad analogy. A local bulletin board is not the vast
searchable space of All
Internet.
-Original Message-
From: Mix Sella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
It does. Spamming is fraud, theft and trespassing (NANAE rule
#0: Spam is
theft). That it's not outlawed doesn't make it any less
fraud, theft and
trespassing. Spammers know people don't want them to do it
On Monday 16 June 2003 19:00, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mix Sella [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[deletia]
Should read: an ONLINE buletin board
What's not fine is someone taking this address (which you
put in the public
domain)
You don't. Email address is not a
12 matches
Mail list logo
