Re: Apache vs. Samba authentication

2002-06-30 Thread Orna Agmon
i have a similar configuration, i trust the yellopages to do the authentication. basically, there are two major ways for authentication: group and name. you can demand that the user has a certain name (with the key word require) , and you verify it by a passwd. you can demand that a user is in a

Re: Apache vs. Samba authentication

2002-06-30 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002, Orna Agmon wrote about Re: Apache vs. Samba authentication: ... main disadvantages: the passwd file is not protected in /etc/shadow, and is created once a (day?). on the other hand, the script which extracts the passwd file from the database also runs under regular user

Re: Apache vs. Samba authentication

2002-06-30 Thread Orna Agmon
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Nadav Har'El wrote: On Sun, Jun 30, 2002, Orna Agmon wrote about Re: Apache vs. Samba authentication: ... main disadvantages: the passwd file is not protected in /etc/shadow, and is created once a (day?). on the other hand, the script which extracts the passwd file

RE: Apache vs. Samba authentication

2002-06-30 Thread Iftach Hyams
I thought about totally different solution : Add an option to AuthType option (Currently Basic and Digest). Using some plugin that utilize some smb utility to check validity. Where do I start from ? I am new to Apache. i have a similar configuration, i trust the yellopages to do the