Hi there. I'm sure someone has got this problem already,and I couldn't find
anything helpful on google, RH, etc. RH 7.0 fails to print to the parallel
port. parport, parport 0-2, lp0-2, all of them are defined as character
devices in /dev; parallel port support compiled in the kernel; the "
Hi there. I'm sure someone has got this problem already,and I couldn't find
anything helpful on google, RH, etc. RH 7.0 fails to print to the parallel
port. parport, parport 0-2, lp0-2, all of them are defined as character
devices in /dev; parallel port support compiled in the kernel
All the RedHat versions are full of bugs (specially x.0) , so whats new.
want a 'stable' os? try slackware.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Yosi wrote:
Hi,
A recent post to /. claims that RedHat 7.0 is full of bugs that almost
make it unusuable http://slashdot.org/articles/00/10/02/2046212.shtml
What you are basically saying is - USE DEBIAN !!!
Regards,
Naor Weissman
RnD department
BroadServe Israel
+97254553183
http://www.broadserve.com
-Original Message-
From: Yosi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ?? 03 ??? 2000 7:37?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RH 7.0
??? 2000 7:37?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RH 7.0 infested with bugs?
Hi,
A recent post to /. claims that RedHat 7.0 is full of bugs that almost
make it unusuable http://slashdot.org/articles/00/10/02/2046212.shtml
Looking at Bugzilla total bug numbers looks bad (although not as bad
mailing list
Subject:Re: DISTRIBUTION WAR!!! (Was: RH 7.0 infested with bugs?)
Hello
SuSE RaVaLaZ 1
Cya,
Oren.
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Let the flame war begin!
Naor Weissman wrote:
What you are basically saying is - USE DEBIAN !!!
Regards,
Naor
Shahar Wrote:
Let the flame war begin!
You are right :-( . While I asked a question that I think will
interest the rest of RedHat users, it seems that some people took
the opportunity to enlighten us all with their wisdom of how they
chose a much superior distribution, and how bad RedHat is. I
-Original Message-
From: Yosi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: ?? 03 ??? 2000 7:37?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RH 7.0 infested with bugs?
Hi,
A recent post to /. claims that RedHat 7.0 is full of bugs that almost
make it unusuable http
| RnD department
| BroadServe Israel
| +97254553183
| http://www.broadserve.com
|
| -Original Message-
| From: Yosi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: ?? 03 ??? 2000 7:37?
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RH 7.0 infested with bugs?
|
| Hi,
|
| A recent post
No. slackware does not use rpm by default nor redhat scripts. slackware
uses simple .tgz packages, and simple BSD scripts. thats how linux should
be ;)
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, avishaya wrote:
Yes, sagi is right.
stay away from all x.0 of redhat versions.wait a little beat.
in a few months,it
wrote:
SuSE RaVaLaZ 1
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, X wrote:
Let the flame war begin!
X XX wrote:
What you are basically saying is - USE DEBIAN !!!
(* The names have been removed to protect the guilty)
Real programers don't use distributions, they boot off a
Neee Real programmers make thier own distribution:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/view/intel-2.4/index.html
with their own package management system..
wrote:
SuSE RaVaLaZ 1
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, X wrote:
Let the flame war begin!
X XX
SB No. slackware does not use rpm by default nor redhat scripts. slackware
SB uses simple .tgz packages, and simple BSD scripts. thats how linux should
SB be ;)
That's bull. Linux should have no packages and no scripts and no
slackware. If you need some software, you code it yourself or download
A recent post to /. claims that RedHat 7.0 is full of bugs that almost
This time, contrary to 6.0, 5.0, etc., it is called "RedHat 7" and
not "RedHat 7.0", so it is not a ".0" release, and there is no reason
for bugs ;-)
--
Eli Marmor
any one know of a mirror with RH 7.0 beta ?
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo
