Gavrie Philipson wrote:
"Marc A. Volovic" wrote:
Software raid is a chancy proposition., IMHO and wasteful of resources.
In the long run, it is cheaper to purchase a hardware RAID.
Would you care to elaborate on why it would be "chancy"?
On the issue of resources: on a file server,
this little reply from
Ira. Have we
bothered our little and underused gray matter over such a trifle?
http://devlinux.com/projects/reiserfs/
specificly: http://devlinux.com/projects/reiserfs/features.html
Have we even bothered to read this.
I understand you're lazy. I pity you. I think you
"Marc A. Volovic" wrote:
You said "corporate" environment. For corp envir, go hardware. For home use.
software should be enough.
As for 5% (say 3%) of CPU, in corp envir, every % is paid for with corp
money,
penny-pinchers abound, etc.
I beg to differ. Let's take a concrete example. Say
Iftach Hyams wrote:
...
enough. If, instead, a 550MHz CPU is used (+10%), this would be more
...
Gavrie.
It is the biggest lie ever !
You have a mother board and a memory running at 100/133Mhz,
You have a loaded bus + loaded IDE/SCSI drives,
You have a loaded network
yea of course
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Gavrie Philipson wrote:
| Ely Levy wrote:
|
| I preety much think it is as we installed here a mandrake 7.1
| on raid using computer (70 gig) using RFS
|
| What kind of RAID? Hardware,
Ely Levy wrote:
yea of course
So what's the point of your reply? I asked about software RAID. Why in
the world wouldn't hardware RAID work with reiserfs?
Gavrie.
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Gavrie Philipson wrote:
| Ely Levy
my, are we not a blind little bat. Have we read this little reply from
Ira. Have we
bothered our little and underused gray matter over such a trifle?
http://devlinux.com/projects/reiserfs/
specificly: http://devlinux.com/projects/reiserfs/features.html
Have we even bothered to read
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Eli Marmor wrote:
I was curious to know: What will be the first distribution to include
full ReiserFS?
are you sure it's distro material yet?
SuSE 6.3 includes something, but it was a version BEFORE the
journaling, so the main feature of ReiserFS
I was curious to know: What will be the first distribution to include
full ReiserFS?
SuSE 6.3 includes something, but it was a version BEFORE the
journaling, so the main feature of ReiserFS is not there...
Mandrake heard about it only a day after the code freeze of 7.0, so
it didn't find its
Hello,
Does anyone have experience using Reiserfs, specifically
as a root partition? Is it recommended?
How about perfomance/stablity issues?
Thanks,
- Oren
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Oren Shomron wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone have experience using Reiserfs, specifically
as a root partition? Is it recommended?
How about perfomance/stablity issues?
I was about to try it, supposedly it's been released, but I donno how
good the fsck tools are and I ASSUME
Oren Shomron wrote:
Does anyone have experience using Reiserfs, specifically
as a root partition? Is it recommended?
How about perfomance/stablity issues?
I don't have personal experience, but saw dozens of opinions of
other people, and all of them say the same. I'll focus on your
questions
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
