Guys
We host software.co.il at http://www.johncompanies.com/ - they are
good, performance is fast, they are FOSS-friendly, i.e. give discounts
if you host an OSS project. For an economy-virtual server, imho, they
cannot be beat. OTOH, if you need the real thing, there is nothing like
rackspace prices are nightmare! specially when it comes to private
people or very small businesses..
I found that EV1 are much cheaper, and their connection to the world
is great (you can find some MRTG graphs there regarding their
connection).
Hetz
On 10/7/05, Danny Lieberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, 7 בOctober 2005 12:18, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
I found that EV1 are much cheaper,
Just a reminder: These were the people that jumped on the SCO
bandwagon and bought SCO licenses to use Linux:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040322133607169
The market has enough
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:14:08AM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lior Kesos
I've reccommended http://www.rotmax.com in the past and I'm
still happy with their service - it's a mediuim size hosting
operation.
I've been hosting there for the past 3 years
Some managers are fools. I've been working with quite few stupid
managers in various jobs and places :)
Does this means EV1 service is bad? does this means any other
problems? I don't think so.
Their management goofed. Happened with almost ANY management in the
world (specially when you treat PR
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:48:07AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
[ regarding security ]
With some other web hosting + shell - you are really totally depend on
his security measures, and I have been an employee of some of the well
known ISP's in this country who's their security skills and
The important issue is the terms of the SCO Linux license which EV1
bought.
AFAIK, the terms of the SCO Linux license (which become binding once
the document is signed and becomes a contract from legal point of view)
are such that EV1 are permitted to use only a certain binary-only
version of
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Some managers are fools. I've been working with quite few stupid
managers in various jobs and places :)
Does this means EV1 service is bad? does this means any other
problems? I don't think so.
Their management goofed.
Well, allow me to update you :)
They made a mistake (actually their CEO did), and they appologized
publically and cancelled all the licensing issues with SCO - so the
story ends..
You CAN install anything you like in those machines. Just for the fun
I switched the machine I had there from RHEL 3
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:36 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Well, allow me to update you :)
They made a mistake (actually their CEO did), and they appologized
publically and cancelled all the licensing issues with SCO - so the
story ends..
Sounds too good to be true.
Do you have a citation for
Hi,
They bought SCOSource licenses for their Linux systems. That license
allows them to only use certain blessed versions of the Linux kernel
(binary only). Quite a severe limitation, IMHO.
And they cancelled the license deal with SCO. The press seems to
forget to publish such small things
I have 2 of their 5$ accounts and have shell access for both
domains.(which both lead to my user on the hositng machine - give you
a homey(~) feeling ...
On 10/7/05, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:14:08AM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
-Original
I asked for a formal note from EV1. As soon as it hits my email box,
I'll publish it here.
Thanks,
Hetz
On 10/7/05, Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:36 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Well, allow me to update you :)
They made a mistake (actually their CEO did), and
First of all - Happy New Year and Mazal Tov for the new job
I've reccommended http://www.rotmax.com in the past and I'm still
happy with their service - it's a mediuim size hosting operation.
I've been hosting there for the past 3 years and I know that some
people in the list have hosted there
-Original Message-
From: Lior Kesos
I've reccommended http://www.rotmax.com in the past and I'm
still happy with their service - it's a mediuim size hosting
operation.
I've been hosting there for the past 3 years and I know that
some people in the list have hosted there as well.
The
Shlomi Fish wrote:
Hi good people!
Having a very populated homepage ( http://www.shlomifish.org/ ), and having
gained a job with a nice steady positive income, I'd like to move my homepage
to a serious web-hosting facility. At the moment, it is hosted at Actcom
(with parts on a different
Actually, I don't understand why don't you select a virtual server,
and allow me to highlight some points:
1. With Virtual Server, you're not locked to any version of component
(imagine that you want to use some feature from Perl 5.8 or Apache 2,
but your host machine only has prior version. go
Hi good people!
Having a very populated homepage ( http://www.shlomifish.org/ ), and having
gained a job with a nice steady positive income, I'd like to move my homepage
to a serious web-hosting facility. At the moment, it is hosted at Actcom
(with parts on a different host in the Technion),
18 matches
Mail list logo
