Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Omer Zak wrote about "You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)": VIDEOPHONES! VIDEOPHONES!! VIDEOPHONES!!! VIDEOPHONES They need at least 384Kbps in each direction to provide high quality pictures. Correct me if

Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Oded Arbel
- Original Message - From: "Nadav Har'El" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't *DSL technology allows for a fixed *total* bandwidth, and it is up to the implementation to decide how much bandwidth it reserves for each direction? The 64kbps choice was probably made

Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Oded Arbel wrote about "Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)": - Original Message - You are wrong (sorry). ADSL is completly asynchronous (that's what the A stands for). I'm sorry, but you got it wron

Re: You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)

2000-12-18 Thread Geoffrey S. Mendelson
Nadav Har'El wrote: On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, Omer Zak wrote about "You forgot about videophones (useful for the deaf among us)! (was: Re: adsl)": VIDEOPHONES! VIDEOPHONES!! VIDEOPHONES!!! VIDEOPHONES They need at least 384Kbps in each direction to provide high quality