Re: gcc question

2002-08-09 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:01:01PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote: My question is, can I compile in the same command line some files under -O1 and some under -O3? If they're going to be linked together, that's a very bad idea. Otherwise, you could probably do it with some Makefile hackery.

Re: gcc question

2002-08-09 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Nadav Har'El [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But if you're going to compile some of the code with -O1 and -O3, your Makefile or configure script are going to look realy hairy :( It will look like black magic. A better (but more time consuming) thing to do is to try to find the offending piece of

Re: gcc question

2002-08-09 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was thinking of kernel compilation, which requires -O2 (force inlining) -O3 turns -finline-functions on. -O2 turns -fforce-mem on, maybe that's what you meant. and thus would break horribly if you compile some of the files with O1. Why? Why

Re: gcc question

2002-08-09 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 10:10:00AM +0300, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote: Muli Ben-Yehuda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I was thinking of kernel compilation, which requires -O2 (force inlining) -O3 turns -finline-functions on. -O2 turns -fforce-mem on, maybe that's what you meant. The kernel

Re: gcc question

2002-08-08 Thread Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader
Quoth Orr Dunkelman: The code is closed under some legal agreements, so I cannot release it, neither send gcc a bug-report. For baseline comparison sake, could you give a compilation round under icc (Intel's i386 copiler)... It (the icc) is somewhat more pedantic than gcc and might flush

Re: gcc question

2002-08-08 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote about Re: gcc question: On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 06:31:11PM +0300, Orr Dunkelman wrote: ... My question is, can I compile in the same command line some files under -O1 and some under -O3? If they're going to be linked together, that's a very bad

[hackers-il] Hypothetical sensitivity of compiler to legal status of source code? (was: Re: gcc question)

2002-08-08 Thread Omer Zak
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Orr Dunkelman wrote: The code is closed under some legal agreements, so I cannot release it, neither send gcc a bug-report. The possibility that gcc is somehow sensitive to the legal status of the code in question does not have to be ruled out. How this might happen

Re: gcc question

2002-08-08 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 06:31:11PM +0300, Orr Dunkelman wrote: I've stumbled with the following problem regarding gcc. Assume for a moment I compile many files, some are header files, some are interface files, and some are the real program. When compiling with -O1 optimization things work,

Re: gcc question.

2000-10-19 Thread Ely Levy
do setenv CC /usr/bin/kgcc or export CC=kgcc on bash Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Yosi wrote: | Hi, | | After reading the answers of Guy and Omer, to your question, I think | that neither of them actually answered, on how to compile a

Re: gcc question.

2000-10-18 Thread Yosi
Hi, After reading the answers of Guy and Omer, to your question, I think that neither of them actually answered, on how to compile a kernel on RedHat 7.0 . If we forget for a moment the flame war about the decision to include a snapshot of gcc in RH7 , and focus on your probelm, the answer will

Re: gcc question.

2000-10-18 Thread Alex Dubrovsky
Yosi wrote: Hi, After reading the answers of Guy and Omer, to your question, I think that neither of them actually answered, on how to compile a kernel on RedHat 7.0 . If we forget for a moment the flame war about the decision to include a snapshot of gcc in RH7 , and focus on your

Re: gcc question.

2000-10-18 Thread Yosi
Hi, Alex is right, you have to change the kernel's Makefile so it will use kgcc insted of gcc. Alex is also correct that the answer I gave appears in the manual. Yosi Alex wrote: i think you also have to set the "CC" system variable to "kgcc" by the way from what I know this issue is stated in

gcc question.

2000-10-17 Thread Maxim Kryachko
Hi all. Having recently installed RH7 I tried to compile several things, such as modem driver, new kernel and modules, in all cases compiler (gcc) reports of a bunch of errors and exits. Both modem driver and kernel (2.3.9) compile OK in Slackware 7 on gcc-2.92. Now I use version 2.96 of gcc,

Re: gcc question.

2000-10-17 Thread guy keren
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Maxim Kryachko wrote: Having recently installed RH7 I tried to compile several things, such as modem driver, new kernel and modules, in all cases compiler (gcc) reports of a bunch of errors and exits. Both modem driver and kernel (2.3.9) compile OK in Slackware 7on

Re: gcc question.

2000-10-17 Thread Omer Musaev
guy keren wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Maxim Kryachko wrote: Having recently installed RH7 I tried to compile several things, such as modem driver, new kernel and modules, in all cases compiler (gcc) reports of a bunch of errors and exits. Both modem driver and kernel (2.3.9) compile OK