Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Not really. The SCO that bought Xenix is not the SCO that is suing IBM.
The SCO that is suing is actually Caldera. They changed the name to
capitalize on SCO's name recognition as they were making money from
SCO UNIX which they had bought a source license* (but
Eli Marmor wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Not really. The SCO that bought Xenix is not the SCO that is suing IBM.
The SCO that is suing is actually Caldera. They changed the name to
capitalize on SCO's name recognition as they were making money from
SCO UNIX which they had bought a source
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Eli Marmor wrote:
By the way: an unknown fact, is that more than 50% of the worldwide
UNIX installations belong to SCO, and all the other (including Sun and
HP) have (together!) less than SCO alone. In numbers, and ignoring
costs, it is possible to say that SCO shipped
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:39:11PM +0300, Miki Shapiro wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Eli Marmor wrote:
By the way: an unknown fact, is that more than 50% of the worldwide
UNIX installations belong to SCO, and all the other (including Sun and
HP) have (together!) less than SCO alone. In
Miki Shapiro wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Eli Marmor wrote:
By the way: an unknown fact, is that more than 50% of the worldwide
UNIX installations belong to SCO, and all the other (including Sun and
HP) have (together!) less than SCO alone. In numbers, and ignoring
costs, it is possible
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
Eli Marmor wrote:
He had some mines in his way, and not everything went in the way he
planned, so when the shares of Caldera were still very high (the DotCom
hype) and SCO shares were down, he exploited the opportunity, and
acquired SCO (for shares, if I recall
-- Original Message ---
From: Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 Jun 2003 07:28:17 +0300
Subject: [OT] Re: please erase your AIX OS
NB: [OT] added to subj.
Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. SCO share goes down 10% as I write
Hetz Ben-Hamo wrote:
If memory serves correctly:
MS bought 5% of SCO shares back then when they sold Xenix to SCO, and
then MS sold those shares.
Not really. The SCO that bought Xenix is not the SCO that is suing IBM.
The SCO that is suing is actually Caldera. They changed the name to
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
* This was fairly common around 1990. ATT sold many source licenses
for UNIX. SCO bought one, Everex (ESIX) bought one, Interactive Systems
(later owned by Kodak and sold to SUN) bought one, etc.
. I While reading the net on this subject, I
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 07:48:36PM +0300, Miki Shapiro wrote:
. I While reading the net on this subject, I picked this piece up:
Not only does SCO's most recent 10Q report document lots of interesting
details over the deal with Microsoft, it also effectively make the claim
that:
The SCO
Well, thats what SCO says ;)
As of (give or take) an hour ago, SCO officially terminated IBM's license to
sell AIX..
http://ir.sco.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=111534
Of course, ask any sane IT guy about this issue and they'll laugh out loud,
but still, this is the first time I see that a
On Monday 16 June 2003 23:58, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Well, thats what SCO says ;)
As of (give or take) an hour ago, SCO officially terminated IBM's license
to sell AIX..
http://ir.sco.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=111534
Well, since the last email 2 things happend:
1. SCO says that your
NB: [OT] added to subj.
Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. SCO share goes down 10% as I write this email..
Still, it went up more than 10-fold since February...
Going back to your previous post about M$ money: didn't M$ own a piece
of the pre-Caldera SCO? If yes, do they still?
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
