Yedidya Bar-david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  No Xserver for windows I ever tested became even near XFree under
>  linux, especially in terms of performance - and that is understandable,
>  becasue each graphic command passes 2 APIs (at least) - win32 and X.

Then one should expect a factor of two; in reality, however, the difference is
much stronger.

>  I once checked the load of an Xterminal on a LAN, and got 100% load
>  quite easily by iconifing and deiconifing a large window several times.
>  On a LAN. (10mbit/s ethernet, only client+server+sniffer).

Just a badly written application... most probably, including a drawing area
without double buffering or like; (de)iconifying should produce not more than a
few X-protocol bytes.

Regards,

Evgeny


--
   ____________________________________________________________
  / Evgeny Stambulchik  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  \
 /  Plasma Laboratory, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel \  \
 |  Phone : (972)8-934-3610  == | == FAX   : (972)8-934-3491 |  |
 |  URL   :    http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/~fnevgeny/  |  |
 |  Finger for PGP key >=====================================+  |
 |______________________________________________________________|

=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to