Re: Interop with Windows zeroconf/LLMNR

2016-12-01 Thread borissh1983
On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 15:23:11 IST Elazar Leibovich wrote:
> Thanks,
> 
> Even if it's up by default, which seems to be the case at least for some
> Windows versions, I still want to know from people's experience, how common
> it is to have someone shut it down

In more than one office I have seen that disabled, along with other sharing 
options ( using group policy). 

> Is it a good practice?

We have done that because of  windows eagerness to share credentials, along 
with  too much link spam. 

Check Responder (github.com/SpiderLab/Responder) for testing your own system.



___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Interop with Windows zeroconf/LLMNR

2016-11-29 Thread Shay Gover
As hardening maybe.
Windows users don't venture into the services area. PC technicians don't
either.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Elazar Leibovich  wrote:

> Thanks,
>
> Even if it's up by default, which seems to be the case at least for some
> Windows versions, I still want to know from people's experience, how common
> it is to have someone shut it down.
> Is it a good practice?
> Are organization do that as a security hardening measure?
> Etc.
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Shay Gover  wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time I was a Windows sysadmin. Anyway, there was a nice site,
>> called blackviper.com that listed windows services default state.
>> However it's appears it's down now. Maybe tomorrow it'll be up?
>>
>> Shay
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Elazar Leibovich 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's really convenient that two Linux computers usuallly have mDNS
>>> installed by default.
>>> I can then do scp x moshe.local, to my friend's laptop.
>>>
>>> In order for that to work with Windows, one can enable Window's zeroconf
>>> standard, LLMNR. The easiest way is by configuring systemd-resolved to
>>> support LLMNR.
>>>
>>> Alas, when I did that, two Windows laptop I examined had LLMNR turned
>>> off. The owners were not sure why.
>>>
>>> Can anyone estimate why this happened?
>>>
>>> Is LLMNR really a good way to interop with Windows, or would half of the
>>> Windows machine would have it turned off?
>>>
>>> Anyone has experience with that?
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Linux-il mailing list
>>> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Interop with Windows zeroconf/LLMNR

2016-11-29 Thread Elazar Leibovich
Thanks,

Even if it's up by default, which seems to be the case at least for some
Windows versions, I still want to know from people's experience, how common
it is to have someone shut it down.
Is it a good practice?
Are organization do that as a security hardening measure?
Etc.

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Shay Gover  wrote:

> Once upon a time I was a Windows sysadmin. Anyway, there was a nice site,
> called blackviper.com that listed windows services default state. However
> it's appears it's down now. Maybe tomorrow it'll be up?
>
> Shay
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Elazar Leibovich 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's really convenient that two Linux computers usuallly have mDNS
>> installed by default.
>> I can then do scp x moshe.local, to my friend's laptop.
>>
>> In order for that to work with Windows, one can enable Window's zeroconf
>> standard, LLMNR. The easiest way is by configuring systemd-resolved to
>> support LLMNR.
>>
>> Alas, when I did that, two Windows laptop I examined had LLMNR turned
>> off. The owners were not sure why.
>>
>> Can anyone estimate why this happened?
>>
>> Is LLMNR really a good way to interop with Windows, or would half of the
>> Windows machine would have it turned off?
>>
>> Anyone has experience with that?
>>
>> ___
>> Linux-il mailing list
>> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>>
>>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il


Re: Interop with Windows zeroconf/LLMNR

2016-11-29 Thread Shay Gover
Once upon a time I was a Windows sysadmin. Anyway, there was a nice site,
called blackviper.com that listed windows services default state. However
it's appears it's down now. Maybe tomorrow it'll be up?

Shay

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Elazar Leibovich  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It's really convenient that two Linux computers usuallly have mDNS
> installed by default.
> I can then do scp x moshe.local, to my friend's laptop.
>
> In order for that to work with Windows, one can enable Window's zeroconf
> standard, LLMNR. The easiest way is by configuring systemd-resolved to
> support LLMNR.
>
> Alas, when I did that, two Windows laptop I examined had LLMNR turned off.
> The owners were not sure why.
>
> Can anyone estimate why this happened?
>
> Is LLMNR really a good way to interop with Windows, or would half of the
> Windows machine would have it turned off?
>
> Anyone has experience with that?
>
> ___
> Linux-il mailing list
> Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
> http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
>
>
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il