On 01/04/04 10:59 +, Krishna Rao SN wrote:
Hi Lists,
I am running squid as proxy and giving access ony to few systems thru mac
addresses.
But one smart guy is running another proxy on one of the system and giving
access to others.
I know the mac address of that guy. I can block that
hi,
I have RedHat Linux 9 installed on my machine, with the present configuration.
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 5.2GB 4.2GB 707MB 86%
/none 528MB 0 528MB 0% /dev/shm
Actually the total disk size is 40GB, out of which
sandeep shivasharan posted in linux-india-help:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 5.2GB 4.2GB 707MB 86%
/none 528MB 0 528MB 0% /dev/shm
Actually the total disk size is 40GB, out of which i allocated only 5GB for
Linux
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 14:56, sandeep shivasharan wrote:
hi,
I have RedHat Linux 9 installed on my machine, with the present configuration.
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda1 5.2GB 4.2GB 707MB 86%
/none 528MB 0 528MB
hi,
Actually my requirement is like this, i've got two
users on samba pdc who always want to share their
files wiht one another. i've created a seperate share
for them and implemented perrmissions like this,
user info :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Clients]# id hardev
uid=806(hardev) gid=964(private)
I am using RHEL 3.0 on my server. I am using telnet / ssh to access my
server, After 3-4 days, when I see the output of w command,
It gives like this :-
15:31:57 up 1:26, 236 users, load average: 1.63, 1.69, 1.68
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
fbd
pradeep m kumar posted in linux-india-help:
[private]
comment = Private for Hardev Kishore
path = /home/Clients/private
public = no
browsable = no
writable = yes
create mask = 771
force group = private
wite list = @private
S. K. Goel posted in linux-india-help:
I am using RHEL 3.0 on my server. I am using telnet / ssh to access my
server, After 3-4 days, when I see the output of w command,
But when I count the output using w|wc it gives 30-40 instead of 238.
This problem never arise, When I am using RHEL 2.1
S. K. Goel wrote:
But when I count the output using w|wc it gives 30-40 instead of 238.
w | wc -l ?
--
Rohan
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
On 05/04/04 15:36 +0530, S. K. Goel wrote:
I am using RHEL 3.0 on my server. I am using telnet / ssh to access my
server, After 3-4 days, when I see the output of w command,
It gives like this :-
15:31:57 up 1:26, 236 users, load average: 1.63, 1.69, 1.68
Look for tools like partition magic / partition manager. They are now
available for Linux as well!
They provide you the best option for resizing the partition
Sarvex Jatasra
Software Engineer
Acme Technologies
011-33030881
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 15:36:06 +0530
S. K. Goel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using RHEL 3.0 on my server. I am using telnet / ssh to access my
server, After 3-4 days, when I see the output of w command,
It gives like this :-
15:31:57 up
On my server 238 is the No of users, This figures is Ok for me, But
problem is that after 4-5 days this figure does not tally with details
of w.
I am using Linux 2.4.21-9.ELsmp kernel on RHEL 3
[S K Goel]
On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 15:59, Binand Sethumadhavan wrote:
S. K. Goel posted in
No, I am not using devfs etc.
Regarding No. of Users, My problem is that w is not showing actual
details, When this problem occurs, after that even the No. of users
exceed 1000, then also it gives the same number, that means I think the
problem may be in /etc/utmp etc. But I am not able to locate
S. K. Goel posted in linux-india-help:
On my server 238 is the No of users, This figures is Ok for me, But
problem is that after 4-5 days this figure does not tally with details
of w.
You mean not all users are reflected in 'w' output? In which case you
might want to tally with the output of
Hello List
I installed all the packages relating to xfce
available at the URL :
www.moongroup.com/yum-repository/fedora/linux/1/i686
I managed to make it work on init 3 by invoking from
the shell startxfce4 which works, but I am not getting
the menu listing(dummied in the list), nor able to run
Hi
I use a Lucent winmodem for sometime. Pretty neat one. Good throughput
over Bsnl dial-up (4-5K). No hassles at all. Once tried getting driver for
PCTEL Hsp56 one. But dint work well. Some sorta Kernel 'tainted' message
did come.
The driver is ltmodem-kv_2.4.20_9-8.26a9-1.i686.rpm.
regards
Hi,
**
I will not be responsible for consequences because of any mistakes that
you make. I have warned you. If you don't know what you are doing then
don't do it.
**
If you give me your harddrive partition
Hi
Is the feature Return-reciept or DSN implemented in Postfix? ANybody
using this feature?
regards
Nataraj
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Is the feature Return-reciept or DSN implemented in Postfix? ANybody
using this feature?
postfix (and exim, qmail) don't support DSN.
srs
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux
On 06/04/04 10:14 +0530, Raj Mathur wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So I though I'd be l33t and scan all my incoming mail for viruses at
point of entry. Second step of being l33t is being lazy, so just
enabled clamav-milter, since all the packages were already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
instead of following such a long, lengthy and risky procedure, why not use GNU Parted.
It works perfect. I've used it multiple times with 100% success on live systems.
rrs
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 12:38:40 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 01:19:49PM +0100, Murali P wrote:
Further any one could help me to incorporate xfce in
the gdm menu please.
Which distribution are you using? Also which version of gdm are you
using? I use Xfce4 on Debian Sid and it works peacefully.
Look at /etc/gdm/gdm.conf
Check out
[Please upgrade if you use Monit on any platform -- Raju]
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
--
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So I though I'd be l33t and scan all my incoming mail for viruses at
point of entry. Second step of being l33t is being lazy, so just
enabled clamav-milter, since all the packages were already installed
on my state-of-the-art bleeding-edge Red Hat 9
Raj Mathur wrote:
First of all, clamav-milter doesn't quarantine messages, it just
bounces them back to the sender. Now this has two issues; firstly,
viruses tend to spoof the From address in e-mails, so some poor bugger
you can set this differently iirc (quarantine or trash infected mail)
you
26 matches
Mail list logo
