Hi Lothar,
On Monday 23 September 2013 17:30:18 Lothar Waßmann wrote:
[...]
@@ -928,6 +931,9 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev) if (IS_ERR(lradc-base))
return PTR_ERR(lradc-base);
+ lradc-clk = devm_clk_get(pdev-dev, NULL);
+
Hi Fabio,
On Monday 23 September 2013 17:13:03 Fabio Estevam wrote:
On 09/23/2013 11:36 AM, Juergen Beisert wrote:
+ lradc-clk = devm_clk_get(pdev-dev, NULL);
+ clk_prepare_enable(lradc-clk);
clk_prepare_enable() may fail, so better check its return value.
Thanks for the comment.
Hi,
I noticed that after commit 212a871a393 (HID: hidraw: correctly deallocate
memory on device disconnect) hidraw doesn't close the underlying hid device
when the device node is closed last time.
For example I have a touch panel (HID over I2C) device with added debug
prints in
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
Can you explain a little further? Mark commit a4a23f6 as bad? An
initial bisect already reported that was the first bad commit, so it
can't be marked bad. The oops on memcpy() happens after commit a4a23f6
is reverted. The oops on memcpy()
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
Don't call hid_open_device till there is actually an user. This saves
power by not opening underlying transport for HID. Also close device
if there are no active mfd client using HID sensor hub.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
Well, while debugging hid-lenovo-tpkbd, I also cleaned it up a little (so this
goes on top of the CVE series):
- use devres API
- remove usb references (so that the regressions tests through uhid are
working)
This has also been tested by
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, oli...@neukum.org wrote:
From: Oliver Neukum oneu...@suse.de
Some systems although they have firmware class 'M', which usually
needs a work around to not crash, must not be subjected to the
work around because the work around crashes them. They cannot be
told apart by
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Jürgen Beisert j...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Hi Fabio,
On Monday 23 September 2013 17:13:03 Fabio Estevam wrote:
On 09/23/2013 11:36 AM, Juergen Beisert wrote:
+ lradc-clk = devm_clk_get(pdev-dev, NULL);
+ clk_prepare_enable(lradc-clk);
On 09/24/2013 05:29 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
Can you explain a little further? Mark commit a4a23f6 as bad? An
initial bisect already reported that was the first bad commit, so it
can't be marked bad. The oops on memcpy() happens after commit
Hey Jiri
I forgot to put you on CC on the initial patch. Any comments on this?
Cheers
David
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:33 PM, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
udev has this nice feature of creating dead /dev/node
All
I have been looking around and I am finding numerous patches for the
atmel_mxt_ts file to adopt it to DTS.
The last status I have seen was we were waiting for some re-write of the file
and that was in April.
Are there any recent patches for this? And are they ready?
I have not followed
On 09/24/2013 05:29 AM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
Can you explain a little further? Mark commit a4a23f6 as bad? An
initial bisect already reported that was the first bad commit, so it
can't be marked bad. The oops on memcpy() happens after commit
12 matches
Mail list logo
