On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai w...@csie.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Hi ChenYu,
Thank you very much for respinning this.
--
Carlo Caione
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-input in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
Hi Anshul,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 08:04:45PM +0530, Anshul Garg wrote:
Dear Mr Dmitry ,
Thanks for the reply.
I understand that if some handler grabs the input device then all
events will sent to that handler only.
My Concern is If No handler has grabbed the input device then all
On Friday 12 December 2014 11:12:50 Andrew Duggan wrote:
On 12/12/2014 12:12 AM, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
On Thursday 11 December 2014 16:26:00 Andrew Duggan wrote:
On 12/11/2014 01:57 PM, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
On Thursday 11 December 2014 13:34:02 Andrew Duggan wrote:
On 12/11/2014
Dear Mr Dmitry ,
Thanks a lot for the clarification.
I was in assumption that one handler can support both -filter() and
-event[s]()
Callback.So that's why i have prepared the patch to first do the
filter then pass
the events.
Can you please tell me why current implementation doesn't expect
