On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 01:10 +, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
> However, in the scenario I mentioned this is exactly what is happening.
> When turning off the screen of a mobile device, the user space
Would you explain why user space doesn't simply stop using those
devices, which in turn will make
On 8 September 2015 at 22:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 01:10 +, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
>>> this would work except for adding a sysfs attribute that would trigger
>>>
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-input=140564626306396=2
>> >
>> > Purely as a matter of interest, in that email Rafael also mentioned
>> > that he and I had
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 01:10 +, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
[cut]
>> this would work except for adding a sysfs attribute that would trigger
>> a runtime suspend while ignoring usage count. Would that be a
>> better direction?
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 8 September 2015 at 22:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 01:10 +, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
>>
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
> In the previous discussion thread , there were a couple of options
> mentioned, but none seemed to reach a consensus. You mentioned
> adding a "more aggressive runtime PM mode" [1]. I'm not sure how
> this would work except for adding a sysfs attribute
On Tuesday, September 08, 2015 10:44:04 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Tirdea, Irina wrote:
>
> > In the previous discussion thread , there were a couple of options
> > mentioned, but none seemed to reach a consensus. You mentioned
> > adding a "more aggressive runtime PM mode" [1].
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-input=140564626306396=2
> >
> > Purely as a matter of interest, in that email Rafael also mentioned
> > that he and I had discussed a way to disable remote wakeup during
> > runtime suspend. Oddly enough, the
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Montag, 7. September 2015, 15:07:47 schrieb Mike Mestnik:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
>>This is just an off the wall guess. Wouldn't such entropy already be
>>collected at a lower level, like raw usb traffic?
>
> The RNG