On Fri, 24 May 2013, David Herrmann wrote:
So I hope we can apply this for linux-next (probably after gustavo
applied the HIDP fix)?
Applied to my tree, together with the hidp fix. Thanks David, thanks
Daniel!
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Hi
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Daniel Nicoletti dantt...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/5/13 David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com:
Anyway, I'd still like to see this patch applied so we have this annoying
bug fixed. I'd be willing to change the power_supply core, too, if one of the
maintainers
Hi Anton
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Anton Vorontsov an...@enomsg.org wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 05:01:30PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
[..]
I really dislike the way power_supply core calls into the drivers during the
add uevent. If a driver holds an I/O mutex (or anything else), it
power_supply core has the bad habit of calling our battery callbacks
from within power_supply_register(). Furthermore, if the callbacks
fail with an unhandled error code, it will skip any uevent that it
might currently process.
So if HID-core registers battery devices, an add uevent is generated
2013/5/13 David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com:
Anyway, I'd still like to see this patch applied so we have this annoying
bug fixed. I'd be willing to change the power_supply core, too, if one of the
maintainers agrees on the design (David? Anton?).
And, @Daniel, can you check whether this
